On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kumar Gala, > > In message <93A8F58D-8C13-4F72-AFF3- > [email protected]> you wrote: >> >>> In my experience, I tend to search for board names first. >> >> So back to the root of my question, do we just have one really long >> list of board names? > > I'm not an expert for the capabilities of Kconfig, but one looong list > with hundrets of entries clearly makes no sense. We obviously need sum > grouping / structuring. > > IMHO there should be several options: > > - for those who look for a board name, we should support this, > probably wih an initial selection by the first letter (case > insensitive) of the board name. > > like this: => board name => M => MPC837XERDB > > - alternatively, it should be possible to restrict the choice by > selecting first processor architecture (ARM, PowerPC, MIPS, ...), > then CPU (family) name, then board names. > > like this: => Architecture => PPC => MPC83xx => MPC837XERDB
I vote for the second one. Now I'll ask what the location of "defconfig"s should be? - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
