Dear Kumar Gala, In message <93a8f58d-8c13-4f72-aff3-cf4fdf9a3...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote: > > > In my experience, I tend to search for board names first. > > So back to the root of my question, do we just have one really long > list of board names?
I'm not an expert for the capabilities of Kconfig, but one looong list with hundrets of entries clearly makes no sense. We obviously need sum grouping / structuring. IMHO there should be several options: - for those who look for a board name, we should support this, probably wih an initial selection by the first letter (case insensitive) of the board name. like this: => board name => M => MPC837XERDB - alternatively, it should be possible to restrict the choice by selecting first processor architecture (ARM, PowerPC, MIPS, ...), then CPU (family) name, then board names. like this: => Architecture => PPC => MPC83xx => MPC837XERDB Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Severe culture shock results when experts from another protocol suite [...] try to read OSI documents. The term "osified" is used to refer to such documents. [...] Any relationship to the word "ossified" is purely intentional. - Marshall T. Rose _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
