Re: proposal: move "Image size requirements" release criterion from Beta to Final

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 5:52 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > Another +1, this makes perfect sense. > Thanks everyone for your feedback. I'll wait a few more days and then implement it. > While we're on the topic, we should also consider bumping the netinst > limit generally to 1.2G. Several netins

Re: proposal: move "Image size requirements" release criterion from Beta to Final

On Mon, 2025-05-19 at 15:13 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > Hi, > in the F42 cycle, we had a bug blocking Beta because one image was oversize > [1], and realized [2] that it might be time to revisit this criterion [3]. > The criterion targets Beta historically, because with optical media, there > was n

Re: proposal: move "Image size requirements" release criterion from Beta to Final

Agreed. Target final. On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:13 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > Hi, > in the F42 cycle, we had a bug blocking Beta because one image was > oversize [1], and realized [2] that it might be time to revisit this > criterion [3]. The criterion targets Beta historically, because with > opti

Re: proposal: move "Image size requirements" release criterion from Beta to Final

On 5/19/25 8:13 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: Hi, in the F42 cycle, we had a bug blocking Beta because one image was oversize [1], and realized [2] that it might be time to revisit this criterion [3]. The criterion targets Beta historically, because with optical media, there was no way of using a "la

Re: proposal: move "Image size requirements" release criterion from Beta to Final

Kamil, I agree. This is the right thing to do. Pat - tablepc On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:13 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > Hi, > in the F42 cycle, we had a bug blocking Beta because one image was > oversize [1], and realized [2] that it might be time to revisit this > criterion [3]. The criterion targe

Re: Do upcoming Fedora 43 support ? (Short list here)

On Wed, 2025-05-07 at 14:48 +0200, Andre Gompel wrote: > 1) Install with systemd-boot instead of GRUB (on UEFI systems) This has been possible since F39, but it's a hidden option. Boot with `inst.sdboot` to try it. I *think* it should work on all images (not 100% sure), but using the everything ne

Re: [Fedora Test Days] Fedora 42 KDE Test Week 2025-03-31

The packet delivery twist adds just the https://worldguesser.io/ right layer of pressure and strategy to keep you on your toes. -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org F

Re: Postfix upgrade problems F41->F42

On Tue, 2025-04-29 at 15:50 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 10:58 PM James Szinger wrote: > > > I'd like to nominate Bug 2360491 - Postfix missing alternative > > /usr/sbin/sendmail -> /usr/bin/sendmail.postfix > > > > as a

Re: Postfix upgrade problems F41->F42

On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 10:58 PM James Szinger wrote: > I'd like to nominate Bug 2360491 - Postfix missing alternative > /usr/sbin/sendmail -> /usr/bin/sendmail.postfix > > as a common bug for Fedora 42 and a blocker for Fedora 43. > You can

Re: Heads up: replaced VNC with RDP in Basic release criteria

> Adam Williamson writes: > For the installer, RDP seems like a perfectly good functional > replacement for VNC, to me. It doesn't have the reverse-connection > feature, but I think that was fairly rarely used. Yeah, only every installation I ever do which probably numbers in tens of thousa

Re: Heads up: replaced VNC with RDP in Basic release criteria

On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 7:26 PM Sérgio Basto via test wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-03-27 at 12:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi folks! I've gone ahead and updated the Basic release criteria to > > specify that installing via 'RDP' must work, instead of 'VNC': > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/w/

Re: Heads up: replaced VNC with RDP in Basic release criteria

On Wed, 2025-04-16 at 00:25 +0100, Sérgio Basto via test wrote: > On Thu, 2025-03-27 at 12:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi folks! I've gone ahead and updated the Basic release criteria to > > specify that installing via 'RDP' must work, instead of 'VNC': > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/w

Re: Heads up: replaced VNC with RDP in Basic release criteria

On Thu, 2025-03-27 at 12:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! I've gone ahead and updated the Basic release criteria to > specify that installing via 'RDP' must work, instead of 'VNC': > > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Basic_Release_Criteria&diff=prev&oldid=734728 > > this i

Re: Trying to understand how to preserve home with a legacy BIOS dual-boot Windows/Fedora install using WebUI

On 4/6/25 8:06 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: I've been preserving /home using the instructions at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_partitioning_custom_btrfs_preserve_home since btrfs became the default, so it ought to work. For what it's worth, I just tried your steps and they worked fo

Re: “Verify” link for Fedora Everything 42 Beta is broken

On Wed, 2025-04-09 at 19:02 -0400, Jason Yundt wrote: > On 4/9/25 14:37, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Tue, 2025-04-08 at 09:48 -0400, Jason Yundt via test wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > On the page where you can download Fedora Everythign 42 Beta > > >

Re: “Verify” link for Fedora Everything 42 Beta is broken

On 4/9/25 14:37, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2025-04-08 at 09:48 -0400, Jason Yundt via test wrote: Hello, On the page where you can download Fedora Everythign 42 Beta , there is a “Verify” link that is supposed to allow you to download a

Re: “Verify” link for Fedora Everything 42 Beta is broken

On Tue, 2025-04-08 at 09:48 -0400, Jason Yundt via test wrote: > Hello, > > On the page where you can download Fedora Everythign 42 Beta > , there is a > “Verify” link that is supposed to allow you to download a |CHECKSUM| > file. Unfortunate

Re: Fedora 42 Test Weeks – Call for Testers

On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 11:31 PM Christopher Boni via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Can these be added to the QA calendar over at > https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//QA/ > > Kind regards, > Christopher Boni > > Hey Christopher, I so wish I could. Last week it gave me 500. Today i

Re: “Verify” link for Fedora Everything 42 Beta is broken

Jason Yundt wrote: > Hello, > On the page where you can download Fedora Everythign 42 Beta > https://alt.fedoraproject.org/prerelease/index.html, there is a > “Verify” link that is supposed to allow you to download a |CHECKSUM| > file. Unfortunately, the link leads to a 404 page. Here’s the URL

Re: Fedora 42 Test Weeks – Call for Testers

Can these be added to the QA calendar over at https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//QA/ Kind regards, Christopher Boni On 7 April 2025 18:39:43 BST, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: >Hey folks, > >QA is hosting a series of Fedora 42 test days this week, and we could >really use your help to make sure t

Re: Trying to understand how to preserve home with a legacy BIOS dual-boot Windows/Fedora install using WebUI

The GTK instructions have always worked for me since after BTRFS became the default. They're very detailed. I couldn't follow the WebUI instructions without the help of the video because they don't have as much detail. I would have had to use the GTK version of the installer (by removing the an

Re: Trying to understand how to preserve home with a legacy BIOS dual-boot Windows/Fedora install using WebUI

Brandon Nielsen wrote: > What worked (this feels equivalent to what you tried, I'm not sure what > the difference is): > 1. Select "Mount point assignment" > 2. Select "root" as the device for the / mount point > 3. Select "sda3" for /boot, check "Reformat" > 4. Click "Add mount" > 5. Enter "/home

Re: Trying to understand how to preserve home with a legacy BIOS dual-boot Windows/Fedora install using WebUI

I've been preserving /home using the instructions at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_partitioning_custom_btrfs_preserve_home since btrfs became the default, so it ought to work. -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To uns

Re: Trying to understand how to preserve home with a legacy BIOS dual-boot Windows/Fedora install using WebUI

On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 8:54 PM Scott Dowdle via test wrote: > > On Sunday, April 6th, 2025 at 3:20 PM, Andre Robatino > wrote: > > > OK, after watching the "Mount point assignment" video at > > https://fedoramagazine.org/anaconda-installer-redesign/ I have a better > > idea of what's going on.

Re: Trying to understand how to preserve home with a legacy BIOS dual-boot Windows/Fedora install using WebUI

On Sunday, April 6th, 2025 at 3:20 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > OK, after watching the "Mount point assignment" video at > https://fedoramagazine.org/anaconda-installer-redesign/ I have a better idea > of what's going on. So here's what I think I'm supposed to do. I used "Add > mount point" to

Re: Trying to understand how to preserve home with a legacy BIOS dual-boot Windows/Fedora install using WebUI

On 4/6/25 4:20 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: OK, after watching the "Mount point assignment" video at https://fedoramagazine.org/anaconda-installer-redesign/ I have a better idea of what's going on. So here's what I think I'm supposed to do. I used "Add mount point" to add a third row /home. After

Re: Trying to understand how to preserve home with a legacy BIOS dual-boot Windows/Fedora install using WebUI

OK, after watching the "Mount point assignment" video at https://fedoramagazine.org/anaconda-installer-redesign/ I have a better idea of what's going on. So here's what I think I'm supposed to do. I used "Add mount point" to add a third row /home. After this, I have 3 mount points (/, /boot, a

Re: Rawhide kernel-6.15 randomly shutting system down

On 1/4/25 19:19, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/1/25 12:47 AM, Ian Laurie via test wrote: On 1/4/25 18:37, Samuel Sieb wrote: Grab both.  I don't know why there are two, but maybe it's the other one.  I don't know where else logind would be seeing a power key.  It's possible that it could come from th

Re: anyone with an intel mac?

On Tue, Mar 25, 2025, at 7:01 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > If you have an Intel Mac with macOS installed, please see > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354671#c8 and respond with > the output from the requested lsblk command. Thanks for the responses to that bug, it should be fixed n

Re: Rawhide kernel-6.15 randomly shutting system down

On 4/1/25 12:11 AM, Ian Laurie via test wrote: OK so the result...  After about an hour fifteen minutes, lost ssh connection ssh looked like this: zorac$ sudo evtest --grab /dev/input/event2 Input driver version is 1.0.1 Input device ID: bus 0x19 vendor 0x0 product 0x1 version 0x0 Input devi

Re: Rawhide kernel-6.15 randomly shutting system down

On 1/4/25 19:02, Ian Laurie via test wrote: On 1/4/25 18:52, Ian Laurie via test wrote: Doing it again, but grabbing the "sleep button" also (events 0, 1 & 2). Same results, nothing via evtest, system shut down.  Almost like the kernel event buffer is out by one, or some rogue pointer is spatt

Re: F42 Final Blocker Bug Report: 2025-04-04

On Fri, 2025-04-04 at 16:15 +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote: > Ahead of the F42 Beta Blocker meeting[1] on Monday, April 7 and > the F42 Final Go/No-Go meeting[2] on Thursday, April 10, please review > the below report on current F42 Final blockers[3]. Your help > discussing, voting on > and resolving a

Re: Rawhide kernel-6.15 randomly shutting system down

On 2/4/25 13:19, Ian Laurie via test wrote: I'll monitor for at least 6 hours to be sure. After a little over 20 hours no issues with 6.14, so BZ time: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2357044 -- Ian Laurie FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser TZ: Australia/Sydney -- ___

Re: Rawhide kernel-6.15 randomly shutting system down

On 2/4/25 08:37, Ian Laurie via test wrote: I'm going to wait for the kernel being built before creating a BZ in case its fixed already. Interesting to note the events causing the issue are coming in as event1, but actually pressing the power button generates event2. Overnight there were 6 event

Re: Rawhide kernel-6.15 randomly shutting system down

On 4/1/25 2:37 PM, Ian Laurie via test wrote: I'm going to wait for the kernel being built before creating a BZ in case its fixed already. Interesting to note the events causing the issue are coming in as event1, but actually pressing the power button generates event2. Overnight there were 6 eve

Re: Rawhide kernel-6.15 randomly shutting system down

On 2/4/25 03:27, Chris Murphy wrote: For what it's worth, rc0 builds are a Fedora only thing. Upstream doesn't release rc0. They're not linux-next but they can still have these kinds of bugs. I'd say, move to kernel-6.15.0-0.rc0.20250331git4e82c87058f4.6.fc43 or stick with 6.14.0, and just ab

Re: Rawhide kernel-6.15 randomly shutting system down

For what it's worth, rc0 builds are a Fedora only thing. Upstream doesn't release rc0. They're not linux-next but they can still have these kinds of bugs. I'd say, move to kernel-6.15.0-0.rc0.20250331git4e82c87058f4.6.fc43 or stick with 6.14.0, and just abandon the kernel that isn't working.

Re: Rawhide kernel-6.15 randomly shutting system down

On 1/4/25 18:52, Ian Laurie via test wrote: Doing it again, but grabbing the "sleep button" also (events 0, 1 & 2). Same results, nothing via evtest, system shut down. Almost like the kernel event buffer is out by one, or some rogue pointer is spattering the buffer. This one took just 10 minu

Re: Rawhide kernel-6.15 randomly shutting system down

On 1/4/25 19:32, Ian Laurie via test wrote: Sorry, I didn't correcly understand the "terminals" reference, I interpreted that to mean the target events.  OK I'll get 3 ssh connections to get all the events.  Rebooting back to 6.15 Got an event 1 reported: Input driver version is 1.0.1 Inpu

Re: Rawhide kernel-6.15 randomly shutting system down

On 4/1/25 12:47 AM, Ian Laurie via test wrote: On 1/4/25 18:37, Samuel Sieb wrote: Grab both.  I don't know why there are two, but maybe it's the other one.  I don't know where else logind would be seeing a power key.  It's possible that it could come from the keyboard, but that's very unlikely.

Re: Rawhide kernel-6.15 randomly shutting system down

On 1/4/25 18:47, Ian Laurie via test wrote: On 1/4/25 18:37, Samuel Sieb wrote: Grab both.  I don't know why there are two, but maybe it's the other one.  I don't know where else logind would be seeing a power key.  It's possible that it could come from the keyboard, but that's very unlikely.

Re: Rawhide kernel-6.15 randomly shutting system down

On 1/4/25 18:37, Samuel Sieb wrote: Grab both.  I don't know why there are two, but maybe it's the other one.  I don't know where else logind would be seeing a power key.  It's possible that it could come from the keyboard, but that's very unlikely. Not sure if my syntax was correct, I used:

Re: Rawhide kernel-6.15 randomly shutting system down

On 1/4/25 16:43, Ian Laurie via test wrote: On 1/4/25 16:24, Samuel Sieb wrote: Install "evtest".  If you run it with no parameters, it will give you a list of available devices.  I have two power switch input devices for some reason, but the physical power button seems to trigger the second one

Re: Rawhide kernel-6.15 randomly shutting system down

On 1/4/25 16:24, Samuel Sieb wrote: Install "evtest".  If you run it with no parameters, it will give you a list of available devices.  I have two power switch input devices for some reason, but the physical power button seems to trigger the second one.  As root, run "evtest --grab /dev/input/eve

Re: Rawhide kernel-6.15 randomly shutting system down

On 3/31/25 10:05 PM, Ian Laurie via test wrote: I'm seeing:     kernel-6.15.0-0.rc0.20250327git1a9239bb4253.5.fc43.x86_64 randomly shutting down the system, anywhere from about 15 minutes to an hour after boot. Looking at the log file, I see that the log file claims the power switch was hit. 

Re: [Fedora Test Days] Fedora 42 KDE Test Week 2025-03-31

I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2353530 a while ago. "kde plasma 42 beta ISO fails to be boot to desktop on Parallels run on macOS" Barry > On 30 Mar 2025, at 13:49, Sumantro Mukherjee via kde > wrote: > > Hey Folks, > > As many of you may know, KDE is becoming a blocking

Re: anyone own an Intel Mac?

This from a Macbook Pro 11,3: NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS PARTTYPE loop07:00 2G 1 loop /run/rootfsbase sda 8:00 465.9G 0 disk ├─sda1 8:10 200M 0 part c12a7328-f81f-11d2-ba4b-00a0c93ec93b └─sda2

Re: F42: missing driver for bluethooth

Thanks a lot, i see. Meanwhile fixed by symlinking in /lib/firmware/intel ln -s ibt-0190-0291.ddc.xz ibt-0190-0291-pci.ddc.xz ln -s ibt-0190-0291.sfi.xz ibt-0190-0291-pci.sfi.xz Aftwards "dracut --force" and reboot. Works. Regards, Roger -- ___ te

Re: F42: missing driver for bluethooth

On Sun, 23 Mar 2025 at 10:33, Roger Grosswiler wrote: > Hi, > > Installed F42 on a new Acer Swift SF16-51. Everything went fine, except > bluetooth. > > According to dmesg, there are missing files within /lib/firmware/intel: > > > [3.843790] Bluetooth: hci0: Failed to load Intel firmware file

Re: A nice blocker bug for Fedora 42 final

On Wed, 2025-03-19 at 13:35 +0100, AV via test wrote: > This concerns a Dell Precision 5690 laptop with Intel Core Ultra7 155H > CPU and Mesa Intel Arc graphics. This laptop was bought in 2023 with > Ubuntu installed (It actually is an "Ubuntu Certified" laptop) and has > been happily running Fedo

Re: Using "Reinstall Fedora" on legacy BIOS machine with F42 Beta gives error "No devices found for boot loader partition 'biosboot'"

Filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2353002 against anaconda-webui. -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedorapro

Re: Using "Reinstall Fedora" on legacy BIOS machine with F42 Beta gives error "No devices found for boot loader partition 'biosboot'"

Pretty simple to reproduce. One of the machines was F41 only, the other was/is dual boot Windows 10/F41. Both were/are legacy BIOS (I upgraded the firmware on the Fedora-only machine to UEFI afterwards, not an option with the other). So reproducing should just require reinstalling on top of an F

Re: Using "Reinstall Fedora" on legacy BIOS machine with F42 Beta gives error "No devices found for boot loader partition 'biosboot'"

On Mon, 2025-03-17 at 13:59 +, Andre Robatino wrote: > I tried using "Reinstall Fedora" (F41 -> F42 Beta) on 2 legacy BIOS machines, > using the GNOME Workstation Live, and got the above error with each. (On one > of them, which is Fedora only, and only a small amount of data in home, I > wo

Re: F41 => F42 upgrade report

forgot to mention: it's an Intel box if I got it right: compiler fix seems on the way: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117178 -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: F41 => F42 upgrade report

On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 08:32:13PM +, old sixpack13 wrote: > upgrade went smooth > Thanks I've been playing with F42. One nice thing, that will probably only affect a few people. For awhile, FreeBSD's bhyve virtualization was having issues on AMD machines with RH based systems, apparently due

Re: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_partitioning_custom_btrfs_preserve_home needs updating

On Thu, 2025-03-13 at 18:03 +, Andre Robatino wrote: > The wiki page above still says not to use WebUI, so needs to be updated for > F42. No, it's intentional that it says that. For webui, there is QA:Testcase_partitioning_webui_guided_btrfs_preserve_home , in the "Guided storage configuratio

Re: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_partitioning_custom_btrfs_preserve_home needs updating

On Thu, Mar 13, 2025, at 12:03 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > The wiki page above still says not to use WebUI, so needs to be updated > for F42. That test case will only apply to the legacy UI. For Web UI, haven't gone digging around either the Mount Point Assignment path, or Launch storage ed

Re: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_partitioning_custom_btrfs_preserve_home needs updating

On Thu, Mar 13, 2025, at 12:03 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: >I haven't looked at > the installer recently, is it obvious now how to preserve /home? I thought it was a couple weeks ago. But I just tried it out, and I'm not seeing it, so I filed a bug. I don't see that we have a criterion for this

Re: [Test-Announce]Fedora 42 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 4:48 PM rawhide via test-announce < test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 42 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation > testing! For more information on release validation

Re: Edge case issues

On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 02:22:50PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 06:50:38 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: > > > Thank you. I actually looked into filing a bug report yesterday, but > > alacritty wasn't listed as a component, only rust-alacritty. However, > > checking what I insta

Re: Edge case issues

On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 06:50:38 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: > Thank you. I actually looked into filing a bug report yesterday, but > alacritty wasn't listed as a component, only rust-alacritty. However, > checking what I installed, it was alacritty, not rust alacritty. Yet the correct component in Fe

Re: Edge case issues

On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 04:22:12PM -0800, Michel Lind wrote: > On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 10:42 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 06:23:07AM -0800, Michel Lind wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 7, 2025, at 2:40 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: > >> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 04:15:33PM -05

Re: Edge case issues

On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 10:42 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 06:23:07AM -0800, Michel Lind wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 7, 2025, at 2:40 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: >> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 04:15:33PM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: >> > >> > >> > Spoiler alert--alacritty is solve

Re: Edge case issues

On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 06:23:07AM -0800, Michel Lind wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2025, at 2:40 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 04:15:33PM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > > > > > > Spoiler alert--alacritty is solved. User error. > > > > > >> I installed F42 from the nightly bu

Re: Edge case issues

On Fri, Mar 7, 2025, at 2:40 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 04:15:33PM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > > > Spoiler alert--alacritty is solved. User error. > > >> I installed F42 from the nightly builds last night. I almost always choose >> a minimal install and build from there

Re: Edge case issues

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 04:15:33PM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: Spoiler alert--alacritty is solved. User error. > I installed F42 from the nightly builds last night. I almost always choose > a minimal install and build from there. > > I ran into two issues, both of which I guess are edge cases

Re: F42: firmware from testing bad on AMD Kaveri Radeon R7

Kamil Paral composed on 2025-03-07 10:21 (UTC+0100): > Felix Miata wrote: >> I upgraded to current after last upgrade 18 Feb., and included >> linux-firmware* >> and amd-gpu-firmware-20250211-1 from testing. This limited both >> framebuffers and >> Xorg to 1024x768 running either 6.13.5 or 6.12.

Re: F42: firmware from testing bad on AMD Kaveri Radeon R7

On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 1:03 AM Felix Miata wrote: > I upgraded to current after last upgrade 18 Feb., and included > linux-firmware* > and amd-gpu-firmware-20250211-1 from testing. This limited both > framebuffers and > Xorg to 1024x768 running either 6.13.5 or 6.12.13, but 6.11.11 remained OK. >

Re: [Test Day] Fedora 42 i18n Test Week 2025-03-04

Joining in today Den sön 2 mars 2025 kl 20:01 skrev Sumantro Mukherjee : > > Hello All, > > > Fedora QA and i18n team is hosting a Fedora Test Week to test the i18n > features in Fedora 42. This is nice opportunity for anyone interested in i18n > or in general to get started with contributing to

Re: modules signatures !

On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 10:46 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2025-02-26 at 11:18 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:29:51PM -0500, Jason Montleon wrote: > > > I have had a bug open for awhile on this with no response: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=23

Re: modules signatures !

On Wed, 2025-02-26 at 11:18 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:29:51PM -0500, Jason Montleon wrote: > > I have had a bug open for awhile on this with no response: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334643 > > > > I also opened an issue on the kernel-ark repo a few

Re: modules signatures !

On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 09:46:46AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2025-02-26 at 11:18 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:29:51PM -0500, Jason Montleon wrote: > > > I have had a bug open for awhile on this with no response: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg

Re: modules signatures !

For what it is worth, I had nothing but problems with 6.13 and nvidia. Never could get it to work. The 6.14 kernel appears to be working in f42. 6.14.0-0.rc3.29.fc42.x86_64 On 2/26/25 1:52 PM, Jason Montleon wrote: I am able to boot the regular 6.14.0 0.rc4.20250226gitac9c34d1e45a.38.fc43 ker

Re: modules signatures !

I am able to boot the regular 6.14.0 0.rc4.20250226gitac9c34d1e45a.38.fc43 kernel built today, but the debug kernel still fails with the same "BPF: Invalid offset" errors I am seeing with 6.13 kernels. On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 2:18 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:29:51PM -0500

Re: modules signatures !

On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:29:51PM -0500, Jason Montleon wrote: > I have had a bug open for awhile on this with no response: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334643 > > I also opened an issue on the kernel-ark repo a few days ago: > https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/

Re: modules signatures !

I have had a bug open for awhile on this with no response: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334643 I also opened an issue on the kernel-ark repo a few days ago: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/176 The last debug kernel that worked for me was 6.12.1. On Wed, Feb 26,

Re: modules signatures !

On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 09:16:09AM +0100, lejeczek via test wrote: > Hi guys/devs > > Does anybody has a watchful eye on it ? not just one but at least couple of > latest "kernel-debug" do _not_ load in. > > many thanks, L. Can you provide more information here? Unfortunately 'modules' is not ve

Re: Draft anaconda webui test cases and matrix changes

On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 2:05 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! So as we're once again trying the 'anaconda webui is release > blocking' thing for F42, and it actually hasn't been reverted yet for > once, I've drafted up new test cases and matrix changes. Here's my > draft matrix page: > > ht

Re: pkgconf appears to be looping (Samuel Sieb)

that reference which seems to have eliminated the hang at login. The moment I run my .rc file, the hang re-appears (sometimes). The term type is konsole, windowmaker (local build from their source repo) is the window manager. I have to CTRL-C to get out of the hang. Building other code doesn&#

Re: pkgconf appears to be looping (Samuel Sieb)

file? I have my own .rc file that is referenced from the root .bashrc. I have commented out that reference which seems to have eliminated the hang at login. The moment I run my .rc file, the hang re-appears (sometimes). The term type is konsole, windowmaker (local build from their source repo

Re: nvidia

If you use gnome, there is an issue with reverse prime https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/3918. Should be fixed in upcoming release. -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.f

Re: 2025-02-17 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora Quality Meeting

Hi! will join the meeting today Den mån 17 feb. 2025 kl 06:08 skrev Adam Williamson : > > # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting > # Date: 2025-02-17 > # Time: 16:00 UTC > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) > # Location: > https://matrix.to/#/#meeting:fedoraproject.org?web-insta

Re: nvidia

, 2025 2:18:17 AM To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: nvidia On 2/14/25 10:40 PM, Mark Williams wrote: > Hello, > > Nvidia driver looks like it is now working, however, when I turn off > hybrid graphics, it fails to boot correctly and I get a blank desktop. > > Feb

Re: nvidia

On 2/14/25 10:40 PM, Mark Williams wrote: Hello, Nvidia driver looks like it is now working, however, when I turn off hybrid graphics, it fails to boot correctly and I get a blank desktop. Feb 15 00:35:06 fedora kernel: [drm:__nv_drm_connector_detect_internal [nvidia_drm]] *ERROR* [nvidia-dr

Re: nvidia

Hello, Nvidia driver looks like it is now working, however, when I turn off hybrid graphics, it fails to boot correctly and I get a blank desktop. Thanks, Mark journalctl -b -1 | grep -i nvidia Feb 15 00:34:51 fedora kernel: input: HDA NVidiaHDMI/DP,pcm=3 as /devices/pci:00/:00:01.

Re: pkgconf appears to be looping

On 2/14/25 11:47 AM, George R Goffe via test wrote: pkgconf seems to be consuming 99.9% of a core. It's not making system calls based on NO activity from strace. This problem begins at login. Unless I kill pkgconf, I will not get logged in. How is pkgconfig running at login? This problem se

Re: Where to fill bugs for fedora-kickstarts?

On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 11:01 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 06:27:12PM +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > > On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 18:10 +0100, David Duncan wrote: > > > We would be happy to assist you with building using the kiwi > > > descriptions for them we are using now. > > > >

Re: Where did dnf cache go? Where did fedora-qa on IRC go?

On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 3:12 PM Onyeibo Oku wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I use a custom script to manage local repos of cached rpms. > The script has been misbehaving since dnf5. At some point, I > thought the devs were reworking repoquery. Now, I can't find the > packages after running a dnf trans

Re: release dates

On 2/5/25 7:33 PM, Felix Miata wrote: Scott Dowdle composed on 2025-02-06 02:01 (UTC): I search for "Fedora 42 schedule" and a page of useful information shows up... at least using Duck Duck Go. I'm not sure what you are looking for specifically. Today: branch date. Google thinks it's smart

Re: nvidia

Great news. Thank you very much. On 2/6/25 7:32 AM, Sérgio Basto via test wrote: Is already fixed in xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-570.86.16-3.fc42 , the package is in koji but is not yet published, you have to wait for the package be published On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 07:04 -0600, Mark Williams wrote:

Re: nvidia

Is already fixed in xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-570.86.16-3.fc42 , the package is in koji but is not yet published, you have to wait for the package be published  On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 07:04 -0600, Mark Williams wrote: > > Thank you. > > On 2/6/25 6:58 AM, Sérgio Basto via test wrote: > > > > > O

Re: nvidia

Thank you. On 2/6/25 6:58 AM, Sérgio Basto via test wrote: On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 05:26 -0600, Mark Williams wrote: nothing provides /usr/sbin/grubby needed by xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-3:570.86.16-2.fc42.x86_64 from rpmfusion-n onfree-nvidia-driver xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-3:570.86.16-2.fc42.x86_64 is

Re: nvidia

On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 05:26 -0600, Mark Williams wrote: > nothing provides /usr/sbin/grubby needed by > xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-3:570.86.16-2.fc42.x86_64 from rpmfusion-n > onfree-nvidia-driver xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-3:570.86.16-2.fc42.x86_64 is an rpmfusion package to contact the maintainer we need repo

Re: release dates

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-42/f-42-key-tasks.html Den tors 6 feb. 2025 kl 02:12 skrev Felix Miata : > > Giving Google > > site:fedoraproject.org 42 alpha beta final rc dates > > produces nothing useful. Roadmap, branch and schedule don't help as search > terms > either. Wh

Re: release dates

Scott Dowdle composed on 2025-02-06 03:56 (UTC): > I'm not sure what you mean about a-page-needs-a-scrollbar. That isn't a > function of HTML nor the responsibility of someone creating a web page. > Browsers these days, for whatever reason the UI developers years ago, decided > that scrollbar

Re: release dates

I'm not sure what you mean about a-page-needs-a-scrollbar. That isn't a function of HTML nor the responsibility of someone creating a web page. Browsers these days, for whatever reason the UI developers years ago, decided that scrollbars should be hidden if the mouse isn't hovering over where

Re: release dates

Scott Dowdle composed on 2025-02-06 02:01 (UTC): > I search for "Fedora 42 schedule" and a page of useful information shows > up... at least using Duck Duck Go. I'm not sure what you are looking for > specifically. Today: branch date. Google thinks it's smart I guess, giving everything but a

Re: release dates

Greetings, I search for "Fedora 42 schedule" and a page of useful information shows up... at least using Duck Duck Go. I'm not sure what you are looking for specifically. TYL,Scott Dowdle (406) 750-3319 [cell] (406) 994-3931 [work] On Wednesday, February 5th, 2025 at 6:11 PM, Felix Miata wr

Re: dnf5

On 6/15/24 1:17 AM, Robert McBroom wrote: Keep a local repository of system rpms using the commands on fc41 QEMU/KVM virtual machine. --- dnf repomanage --old . |xargs rm -rf cd ../ createrepo_c --update -c cachedir Packages --- After the latest system update get the message Unknown argume

Re: Will bin-sbin-merge migrate existing systems?

On 29/1/25 10:37, Ian Laurie via test wrote: As of Wednesday the list is down to 51 non-link entries in /usr/sbin. Almost half of them caused by freeipmi that I can see is currently FTBFS in 42 (BZ#2340176). I'm down to 48 non-link entries in /usr/sbin. The count isn't dropping as quickly as

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >