Hi Dan,
You might be pleased to hear that for the last year I've been
working on a mail client called 'Empath', based on the Qt and
KDE libraries.
Bad point:
* It isn't finished yet. Looking to make it beta when KDE 2 arrives.
#if Dan McGarry
> Up till now, I've stayed with MS Outlook Express b
I'm sorry to re-post this, but it's very difficult working in Gnome
without "double click" support. I'm sure it's a stupid configuration
problem somewhere (that's what all of my problems so far have turned out to
be), but I can't find it and no one else seems to know what I'm talking
At 23:47 2000-02-17 -0500, you wrote:
>Up till now, I've stayed with MS Outlook Express because of laziness (and
>several hundred MB of stored messages). Some recent problems with it have
>sent me looking for a decent X-based mail client. I'm looking for:
>
>* Something that isn't netscape mai
Thank you to Luke & Linda. proves you are never too old to
learn something new if you ask the right people.
Kind of wish I didn't learn about the Win option. Now five
years worth of ranting was for nothing. I guess I figured
the option, if it existed would be in Explorer. I had
assumed the check
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Tania M. Morell wrote:
> I don't know... what would be the same segment?
The easiest way to check would be to ping it from something on the same
physical hub..technically you just want to find out if computers that
don't have to go through a router to talk to it can talk to
Thanks Rik.
I now feel like an idiot, because I said irc and meant icq.
:: sigh ::
:: reminds self not to type before wakening up ::
And this:
Latest Musings : "There's a Snake in my Boot!" (04 Feb)
> No Pain, No Gain (11 feb)
No pain, no fun, IMHO.
You didn't read the article.
There's n
"Dan McGarry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Up till now, I've stayed with MS Outlook Express because of laziness (and
> several hundred MB of stored messages). Some recent problems with it have
> sent me looking for a decent X-based mail client. I'm looking for:
[Wish list omitted]
I wrote an a
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 12:28:50AM -0600 or thereabouts, Stephan Zaniolo wrote:
[programs you expect not getting started when you click on them in
Gnome]
> seem to be correct. The only thing I know I've done since it worked last
> was to try fixing a problem with my internet connection. For som
> Thank you to Luke & Linda. proves you are never too old to
> learn something new if you ask the right people.
> Kind of wish I didn't learn about the Win option. Now five
> years worth of ranting was for nothing. I guess I figured
> the option, if it existed would be in Explorer. I had
> assu
>* Something that isn't netscape mail.
procmail[1]
>* Supports multiple user accounts on multiple servers.
fetchmail[1]
>* Supports kill-files, or has a scripting interface that allows
>spam-blocking.
procmail
>* Allows channeling of incoming traffic into multiple folders.
procmail
>* And, for bonus points, is threaded.
if you mean multithreaded - I think tkrat is.
if you mean messages are threaded - no they aren't, much to my chagrin.
They aren't in cscmail, either, far as I can tell.
If I ever write a mail client, it will be threaded! (I'll probably be a grandmother b
#if Sunnanvind
> Hmm, another Good Thing would be one that allows the user to write mail
> while checking; to check mail while reading, etc etc.. is that what
> threaded means or does threaded refer to that you can see which mails were
> in reply to which?
> Sunnan
Empath does both :) Actually, i
>When you load Empath, it syncs with all your folders in the background.
>Then when you click on a message, it retrieves it in the background.
>It does everything that may block in the background. I hate a UI
>that stalls.
>
Tell us whether its stalls when you have 2000+ mails in your Linuxchix ma
On Prickle-Prickle, Chaos 49, Luke Woods wrote:
> Hah. Assume nothing in Windows.. Anything you do know about it, you can
> probably bet will be different with their next release. There continuity
> never ceases to amaze me.. "Consistency" Hah!.
Nn, and if you think the *english* windows vers
On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 11:47:01PM -0500 or thereabouts, Dan McGarry wrote:
> Up till now, I've stayed with MS Outlook Express because of laziness (and
> several hundred MB of stored messages). Some recent problems with it have
> sent me looking for a decent X-based mail client. I'm looking for:
>I am very curious to know what X-based mailers have that console
>mailers don't. Note that I can view URLs and display pictures in mutt
>when I run it in X, so that doesn't count!
I think it's not so much having pics etc, but rather having buttons to click and menus
to choose from.
Even though
>>I am very curious to know what X-based mailers have that console
>>mailers don't. Note that I can view URLs and display pictures in mutt
>>when I run it in X, so that doesn't count!
> Britta, who in her search for a fast browser even tried w3m, despite what she just
>said...
Oh, and I do use
#if Britta Koch
> >When you load Empath, it syncs with all your folders in the background.
> >Then when you click on a message, it retrieves it in the background.
> >It does everything that may block in the background. I hate a UI
> >that stalls.
> >
> Tell us whether its stalls when you have 2000
#if Britta Koch
> If I ever write a mail client, it will be threaded!
You volunteering to help ? ;)
Rik
--
Dress as tourists imagine.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
Nope, I don't know C++ and I don't like or use Qt / KDE.
I'd write a mail client in python (or help the guy that's writing pygmy),
when I have the time (read: when I've become a millionaire on stock options after
getting
a job in a startup / gone into pension / never)
*** REPLY SEPARATOR
Okay. So discovering that it needed the devel libraries to install was
one thing. I got all the files, and installed them. So I told gnomeicu
to ./configure, and it gave me this error again:
checking for gnome-config... no
checking for gnomeConf.sh file in /usr/local/lib... not found
configure
> I'm not at that computer now and can't run ifconfig until tomorrow but
> I've tried pinging from one of our server and this is what I get:
> chipshot # ping 10.254.254.245 PING 10.254.254.245 (10.254.254.245):
> 56 data bytes
Your box is off the net somehow. Make sure the wires are hooked up
On Feb 18, Lighthouse Keeper in the Desert Sun conjectured:
> Okay. So discovering that it needed the devel libraries to install was
> one thing. I got all the files, and installed them. So I told gnomeicu
> to ./configure, and it gave me this error again:
> checking for gnome-config... no
>
Good news!, I can get to my work computer from home!
Here's the wierd thing. After dialing in to work, I
can telnet into it from any telnet client using the ip
but if I ssh into one of the servers first and THEN
try to telnet or ssh into it, it won't go. Maybe my
puter won't trust the servers?
does anyone out there have experience with getting kdevelop to work
properly? I keep getting the msg that kdbg is not found so debugging in
kdevelop will not be possible. Thing is, I have instaled kdbg, and un- &
re-installed kdevelop, then run setup; kdevelop still does not find kdbg.
any sugg
applet-widget.h file is included from
gnome-core-devel package. ( gnome-core-devel-1.x.xx.rpm )
Once again, you can find out if you have the package by
'rpm -q -l | egrep applet-widget.h'
Hrmm maybe you should use either binary package (rpm I assume).
First, you won't need any of these devel lib
Your missing some more devel stuff. As you see below your missing
gnome-config and well without it your program wn't know where to find
the panel-applet-devel stuff. I'm not sure which rpm they would be
available in :(
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 09:16:12AM -0800, Lighthouse Keeper in the Desert S
On Feb 18, Dan Nguyen conjectured:
> Your missing some more devel stuff. As you see below your missing
> gnome-config and well without it your program wn't know where to find
> the panel-applet-devel stuff. I'm not sure which rpm they would be
> available in :(
Hmm. I do have the gnome-config
> I can ssh to any server (there are dozens) from my puter but I can't
> telnet to my puter from the servers.. I'm thinking it has something
> to do with how security is set up but I don't know.
I think your site has network connectivity problems. Regardless of security
policy, all machines
The BitchX on my system works fine for most of my accounts.
One account is not able to connect to any of the IRC servers on
any IRC nets. The user and the client go with an IP address
that does not exist.
Connecting to port 6667 of server irc.efnet.org [refnum 0]
Closing Link: user1[~[EMAIL P
Okay... So i downloaded gnome-core-devel, ./configured, and make. Still
not doing waht it's supposed to. SHould I just paste the whole make
output? I'm about to say to Tartarus with it and get everybuddy.
Conni
cursing like a sailor at the computer
--
First we go to Three Mile Island, then
But Jeff, I've seen situations where ping has been turned off for security reasons.
Haven't followed this thread closely, has traceroute been tried?
Is telnet turned on on the machine you can't telnet to?
>>> Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/18 1:03 PM >>>
> I can ssh to any server (there
> But Jeff, I've seen situations where ping has been turned off for
> security reasons.
What security reasons were those? ping is a really basic tool without too
many security implications (besides DOS, which can be done with any protocol).
If ping has been disabled, then I'd start looking
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 10:59:17AM -0800, Lighthouse Keeper in the Desert Sun wrote:
> On Feb 18, Dan Nguyen conjectured:
>
> > Your missing some more devel stuff. As you see below your missing
> > gnome-config and well without it your program wn't know where to find
> > the panel-applet-devel s
I work for a small comapny and we have about 6 domain names registered. I need
to set up virtual email domains. the requirements are that the mail must appear
to come from [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] and be able to check their
mail from home. I found a couple references on the web an
I may be wrong on this, I haven't really been following the thread all
that intently.
if the admin setup the security to reject ICMP, then ping wouldn't work,
and neither would traceroute. While ICMP seems like a pointless thing to
block, other things use ICMP such as snmp, I believe, in which c
Have you tried putting both domains in your /etc/aliases file?
-nicole
Stewart Larsen wrote:
>
> I work for a small comapny and we have about 6 domain names registered. I need
> to set up virtual email domains. the requirements are that the mail must appear
> to come from [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
You will probably need to:
add the domains to sendmail.cw
format: just list the domains on seperate lines
add any virtual user mapping to virtual* files
(don't recall the formatting)
add relay permission (by domain) to access* files
I have a problem can someone help..?
This is my first time using this list
OS:
RH 5.2 out of the box
Firewall script from:
Hali Tower Darkover Firewall design tool,
ipfwadm, setup for 2 nic cards
Running on a P100, 16mb ram, 540mb Hd.
External card using DHCP @home connection.
Usin
Hey All,
I do not all ping responses in my network, as a matter of security. I
have futher disabled users from doing things like traceroute, host, etc.
The point to this is that there should be no need to do this in a work
environment unless you're on a network engineer side. If you're
responsib
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 10:59:17AM -0800 or thereabouts, Lighthouse Keeper in the
Desert Sun wrote:
> Maybe I need gnome-core-devel. THat is the only one it wants... (This is
> a big pain in my arse, you know? My modem freezes and stalls a lot after
> a couple hundred K, and I'm using a 28K d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hey All,
> And
> how many office people do you know that need to ping a host?
I find that it saves immense amount of engineer time if the even
remotely clued can do pings and traceroutes and know what they
mean.
It saves on the 'the internet is down' messages. I fa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey All,
> I do not all ping responses in my network, as a matter of security. I
> have futher disabled users from doing things like traceroute, host, etc.
> The point to this is that there should be no need to do this in a work
> environment unless you're on a networ
"Jenn V." wrote:
> And being able to do basic diagnostics makes them feel much
> more in control - they don't panic when they know they can
> /do/ something. And they get so enthusiastic when they know
> they've been helpful. :)
Heh.
It's *great* supporting (Linux using) PhD. students. As often
Stephan Zaniolo wrote:
>
> I'm sorry to re-post this, but it's very difficult working in Gnome
> without "double click" support. I'm sure it's a stupid configuration
> problem somewhere
I don't use a desktop much but When in Gnome I have found
frequent non-response to double clicks. T
Telsa Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm told that less bandwidth is not actually the major reason for
> the package/package-devel split: it's much more for the people who
> simply won't ever want or need to build new things and will only
> be getting the occasional (binary) RPM when secu
Hi Jenny,
I know EXACTLY how you feel! I got married when I was 22 - I am a sys admin
and my husband is a programmer. I fell into the same routine that you are in
now: cleaning, cooking, shopping, laundry, etc... and felt strangely
inadequate if I fell behind in any of my "duties". It is now four
#if Britta Koch
> Nope, I don't know C++ and I don't like or use Qt / KDE.
> I'd write a mail client in python (or help the guy that's writing pygmy),
> when I have the time (read: when I've become a millionaire on stock
> options after getting a job in a startup / gone into pension / never)
Ah,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 07:17:31PM -0600, Robert Kiesling wrote:
>
> Telsa Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm told that less bandwidth is not actually the major reason for
> > the package/package-devel split: it's much more for the people who
> > simply won't ever want or need to buil
- Original Message -
From: Sunnanvind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2000 4:01 AM
Subject: Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommendations
> At 23:47 2000-02-17 -0500, you wrote:
> >Up till now, I've stayed with MS Outlook Express because of laziness
- Original Message -
From: Robert Kiesling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2000 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommendations
> I wrote an article recently comparing the readily-available E-mail
> clients for
- Original Message -
From: Britta Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2000 6:25 AM
Subject: Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommendations
> Procmail is for mail filtering, and has a very easy syntax (I think -
it's quite powerful, >too), if you
- Original Message -
From: Britta Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2000 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommendations
> >When you load Empath, it syncs with all your folders in the background.
> >Then when you click on a message,
- Original Message -
From: Telsa Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2000 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommendations
> I am very curious to know what X-based mailers have that console
> mailers don't. Note that I can view URLs a
#if Dan McGarry
>
> This brings up a very important (to me) point: I like to keep *all* my
> messages, and I'd love to be able to access them programmtically in the
> future, in order to process and index them, then write a search interface
> for them.
>
Well if you use a mail client that suppo
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:08:09 -0800, "Amanda Lenay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I fell into the same routine that you are in now: cleaning, cooking,
>shopping, laundry, etc... and felt strangely inadequate if I fell
>behind in any of my "duties".
I ended up drawing the housework straw in my relat
56 matches
Mail list logo
