----- Original Message ----- From: Telsa Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2000 9:17 AM Subject: Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommendations > I am very curious to know what X-based mailers have that console > mailers don't. Note that I can view URLs and display pictures in mutt > when I run it in X, so that doesn't count! Two things that I can think of off the top of my head: * Unthinking interface for lazy (in the un-Perlish sense) users like me who ingest graphical data more quickly than textual -- especially between 01:00 and 03:00, which is typical slurp time for my @moodindigo.com mail. * At-a-glance display of *all* folders and quantitative feedback concerning their size and state. Britta made some good observations about this in her message, especially about tree displays. I like 'em. -- Dan McGarry http://www.moodindigo.com/ ************ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
- Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommendations Britta Koch
- Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommendations Telsa Gwynne
- [techtalk] strange mail behavior Samantha Atkins
- Re: [techtalk] strange mail behavior JDF
- Re: [techtalk] strange mail behavior Shad Young
- Re: [techtalk] strange mail behav... Phil V Savoie
- Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommendatio... Dan McGarry
- Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommend... Laurel Fan
- Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommend... Rik Hemsley
- [techtalk] strange mail behavior Samantha Atkins
- Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommendations Dan McGarry
- Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommendations Karolina Lindqvist
- Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommendations Caitlyn M. Martin
- Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommendations Dan McGarry
- Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommendations Shad Young
- Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommendatio... Caitlyn M. Martin
- Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommend... Shad Young
- Re: [techtalk] X Mail client recommendations Rik Hemsley