t is correct, how to proceed - adding OSM notes to these ways to
let the author correct these?
Kind Regards,
Peter
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
ould be avoided, but that is probably just a different opinion.
See the GraphHopper issue because of this wink
https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/435
Regards,
Peter
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetm
Hi Dave, hi Warin,
exactly my thoughts. See also again the comments on my diary: these
names seem to be official ones.
So I'll add OSM notes to let others fix this or should I move them
directly to official name and leave name empty? (I've no local knowledge
there :))
Kind Regards,
Hi Martin,
we will then know that there is no real road name and when having the
"routing-engine use case" in mind we can derive a description for the
direction (or via ref) in a localized manner, or via potential surface
tags or relations (official bike routes etc).
Peter
On 27.09.
Hi Paul, hi John,
On 27.09.2015 14:46, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 5:21 AM, Peter <mailto:graphhop...@gmx.de>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> we've detecting more and more long names for highways, like I once
> reported here: http://www.
thing to do from far away might be
> getting in contact with the local mappers and point them to a potential
> problem.
I've asked exactly this as I feared the same problems :)
So I'll add an OSM note...
Regards,
Peter
___
hould
normally not go into the name tag or how to fix this properly, if at all.
Regards,
Peter
**
*
Tertiary Road «Москва — Малоярославец — Рославль до границы с
Республикой Беларусь (на Бобруйск, Слуцк)» — Спас-Деменск — Ельня —
Починок» — Бояды, Починок, Ленинское сельское посе
__
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
--
Groeten,
Peter
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Try this one: http://openbusmap.org/
Dunno how old it's data is, looks like a week old or something.
2010/12/15 Laurence Penney :
> The other day I tidied up a road junction near where I live in Bristol,
> moving nodes and deleting a way with the aid of Bing imagery. I found it more
> problemat
Yup. Work is being done on Mapnik2.
Read about it on http://trac.mapnik.org/wiki/Mapnik2
2010/12/15 Robert Elsenaar :
> Hi,
>
> We all know there lot of our maps are rendered with Mapnik.
> Does somebody knows if there is development going on on this software. Dows
> thsi software package evolve i
Thanks! September is quite old...
2010/12/15 Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) :
> On 12/15/2010 04:39 PM, Peter wrote:
>>
>> Try this one: http://openbusmap.org/
>> Dunno how old it's data is, looks like a week old or something.
>
> The data is from September.
> h
According to the Milestone date in 15 hours.
http://trac.mapnik.org/milestone/Mapnik2
...but I don't think so. There is no reliable release date.
Peter
2010/12/21 Wyo :
> Lennard wrote:
>>
>> On 20-12-2010 22:29, Wyo wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm, no remarks at all. Now wh
There is always the note and fixme tags...
2010/12/23 :
>
> Citeren "S.Higashi" :
>
>> Hi ergo,
>>
>> I researched Akihabara,Tokyo lasy sunday^_^
>> There are many anime shops and hard to categorize.
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Anime01_video.jpg
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
cycleway=track is used when there is a cycle path paralell to a road.
But it is esentially the same as tagging the cycleway as a seperate
way with highway=cycleway.
See also: "A track is a cycle path that is separated from cars
(commonly referred to as a "bike path", "greenway", or "Class 1
facili
Use linux, do an ls -lhA /media/drivelabel copy the file you need,
leave the rest untouched, unplug, done!
But browser vulnerabilities? Those usually get patched within the day, right?
2011/1/6 :
> Leaving USB thumb drives lying around, so that people will plug them into a
> computer to find out
Ride the City
http://www.ridethecity.com/
Maybe there is some explanation there.
2011/1/6 Nathan Edgars II :
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Robert Elsenaar wrote:
>> RTC is the abbriviation of Regional Transportation Commission. So the amout
>> of money you have to pay for e.g. a bus ride.
> R
barbecue=support ?
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 22 mei 2023 om 20:06 heeft Dave F via Tagging
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> https://snipboard.io/H5FYGT.jpghttps://snipboard.io/H5FYGT.jpgHi
> I've a leisure=picnic_table but has an extended table top made of metal to
>
Trying to understand. If I read this right you want the router/navigator to
replace the target address of a routing request with a different object or
location, then start routing, right?
Why not simply tag the object_id or other identifier of the
replace-destination on the source object (in your
Fr gr Peter Elderson
Op vr 7 jul 2023 om 03:58 schreef Matija Nalis <
mnalis-openstreetmapl...@voyager.hr>:
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 18:00:26 +1000, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 5/7/23 03:38, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
> >> ford=impassable
How did you find out what these paths are? Any kind of signage there?
Fr Gr Peter Elderson
Op vr 8 sep 2023 om 19:08 schreef Bryce Nesbitt :
>
> I recently went on a hike, guided only by OSMAnd. We ended up planning a
> route
> that took us uphill on what turned out to be a long s
So, no signage?
Incline and mtb-scale still don't say you can't hike there.
Fr Gr. Peter Elderson
Op vr 8 sep 2023 om 23:01 schreef Mike Thompson :
> One of the trails was
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/593945914#map=19/37.99250/-122.50667
> highway <https://wiki.
I like this proposal very much.
One thing: by its nature, other naturals will overlap with natural=wadi,
right? Any thoughts on that?
And, you say you can map it as a node. That seems a bit strange, because
it's such an elongated feature.
Fr gr Peter Elderson
Op za 25 mei 2024 om 17:51 sc
, no
matter how lacking the additional tagging is. Last resort would be ignoring
it.
If basic tagging means that renderers and routers start to ignore mapped
ways, that would be bad indeed.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op zo 31 mei 2020 om 17:37 schreef Daniel Westergren :
> As I recall, a long t
discuss a
solution first, than see the issue as comment in a no or abstain vote!
Best, Peter Elderson
Op wo 20 mei 2020 om 13:33 schreef Peter Elderson :
> Please review and comment on this proposal:
>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Recreational_route_re
Thanks, I will have a go. Probably it's not that hard.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op ma 1 jun. 2020 om 11:49 schreef Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org>:
>
>
>
> Jun 1, 2020, 10:03 by pelder...@gmail.com:
>
>
> Just a reminder: in a few days vo
ndwork for things to come.
Best, Peter Elderson
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
well-trodden path
This is the path to the cliffs.
It will be several days before snowploughs clear a path (through) to the
village.
They followed the path until they came to a gate.
So this
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.9940387923&lng=4.707510424794445&z=17&focus=photo&pK
chapter!)
Best, Peter Elderson
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
a textual clean-up and add links to
relevant feature pages?
Best, Peter Elderson
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
and belong to a transfer
section, all at the same time.
A relation member cannot have the forward|backward role, but it could be
both transfer and one of the approved basic role set.
This complication can always be solved within a relation hierarchy, though.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op do 18 jun. 202
he bicycle route relation, it should
alway check the ways themselves for access, no matter what the route
relation says.
Fr gr Peter Elderson
Op vr 19 jun. 2020 om 14:02 schreef Francesco Ansanelli :
> Dear Volker and Peter,
>
> I agree with you both...
> The question was born for a
This
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Recreational_route_relation_roles#Transfer>
is
the talk page section I wrote about a week ago, for future consideration.
Fr gr Peter Elderson
Op vr 19 jun. 2020 om 14:33 schreef Peter Elderson :
> I think a bicycle rout
Networks for canoes use network=lpn|rpn|npn|rpn where p stands for
paddling.
Hm, I fear that only complicates the matter...
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op di 23 jun. 2020 om 14:05 schreef Niels Elgaard Larsen :
> Joseph Eisenberg:
> > The wiki page Key:boat <https://wiki.openstreet
For the record, I think a transfer role is a generic solution for the
issue raised here, applicable to the cable car transfer and other types of
transfer in routes, but I will not propose a new role value any time soon.
Anyone who wants to do it has my support, though.
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op
What would be a proper example page for this? The
after-proposal-cleanup-procedure suggests the key:highway page, but that
does not seem appropriate for a role set.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op vr 26 jun. 2020 om 13:25 schreef Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org>:
s.
For example:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Tagging_scheme_for_hiking_and_foot_route_relations#Roles
Best, Peter Elderson
Op vr 26 jun. 2020 om 17:22 schreef Tobias Knerr :
> On 25.06.20 19:46, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> > Should individual pages for these roles be l
Organic without any mineral, would you still call that soil?
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op vr 10 jul. 2020 om 11:55 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdre...@gmail.com>:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 10. Jul 2020, at 11:39, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
> ta
Looks like humus is a component of soil. So I think soil covers it, being a
top layer consisting of mixed organic and mineral matter.
To me it is hard to imagine an area as permanently natural=bare_soil.
Wouldn't there always be some kind of vegetation within a year?
Best, Peter Elderson
indicate that it is bare soil.
All in all, I think natural=bare_soil is the best option, and that it fills
an important gap in the mapping of Earth's surface.
Question: How sure can you be from satellite imagery or aerial photography
that an area is actually bare soil?
Best, Peter Elderson
Question: does it break anything? I am thinking about existing relations of
various kinds.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op vr 10 jul. 2020 om 16:17 schreef Matthew Woehlke <
mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com>:
> As some of you may recall, I'm working on a project to do traffic
> simulation wit
me, not
by discovering all routes and turn restrictions are broken.
Just a consideration, if it doesn't break anything it's fine.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op vr 10 jul. 2020 om 16:50 schreef Matthew Woehlke <
mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com>:
> On 10/07/2020 10.36, Peter Elderson wrote
ns. Does not confuse
me. At all.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op zo 12 jul. 2020 om 16:49 schreef Mike Thompson :
> Hello,
>
> According to the wiki[0], it seems that the network tag has different
> meanings and possible values based upon if it is applied to a route
> relation where route=
rarchy. Feel free
to try though.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op zo 12 jul. 2020 om 21:04 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdre...@gmail.com>:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 12. Jul 2020, at 20:32, Mark Wagner wrote:
> >
> > The US has two national highway netwo
S. or Interstate when the road clearly crosses state lines. I think
that"s more redundant than tagging "we classify this route as a regional
route", even though it might cross two national borders in a few places and
half the roads are outside our borders, and we don't k
Maybe just tag network=nfn then? Can be applied in any country. Details see
oprator and ref.
How two distinguish two roads hundreds of miles away from each other? Hm...
that is a hard question...
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 13 jul. 2020 om 00:33 heeft Clay Smalley het
> volgende gesc
recreational routes
onto the new consistent scheme without breaking current rendering and
processing, if you can do it, let's talk again!
Mvg Peter Elderson
Op 13 jul. 2020 om 00:18 heeft Paul Johnson het
volgende geschreven:
Disambiguation. US:FS:Hood and US:FS:Ozark are two diff
damage
than good, even if it were possible.
Just "consistency" is not worth it. Is there a more compellent reason?
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op zo 12 jul. 2020 om 16:49 schreef Mike Thompson :
> Hello,
>
> According to the wiki[0], it seems that the network tag has different
>
I can't see how that applies to recreational route networks in Europe.
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 13 jul. 2020 om 15:33 heeft Paul Johnson het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>
>
>
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:04 AM Peter Elderson wrote:
>> Sounds to me th
around the world, for recreational routes of all scopes and
modalities, even though countries have very different administration and
maintenance systems from completely central to distributed and chaotic, and
different for most modalities.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op ma 13 jul. 2020 om 18:51 schreef
Route=foot, route=hiking, route=bicycle, route=piste, route=inline_skates,
route=canoe, route=horse.
modality may be a wrong word? It's used in Nederland to mean transport
mode, including walking.
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op ma 13 jul. 2020 om 20:29 schreef Paul Johnson :
> What is a recr
Wouldn't a multipolygon with just two outers solve that parking case?
Best Peter Elderson
Op ma 13 jul. 2020 om 21:02 schreef Lionel Giard :
> I also saw it used for parking lot that are completely separated (like on
> two sides of a big highway) but still part of the &qu
As I understand it, it is soil. That is something.
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op ma 13 jul. 2020 om 23:09 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdre...@gmail.com>:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 13. Jul 2020, at 22:36, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
> >
> > The Ata
That's OSM in a nutshell.
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 13 jul. 2020 om 23:24 heeft Martin Koppenhoefer
> het volgende geschreven:
>
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 13. Jul 2020, at 23:16, Peter Elderson wrote:
>>
>> As I understand it, it is soil
multipolygon.
Major renderers support this.
One parking lot on two sides of a road is perfect for this method.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op di 14 jul. 2020 om 16:55 schreef Lionel Giard :
> Wouldn't a multipolygon with just two outers solve that parking case?
>> Best Peter Elderson
&
to ways, borders to ways
and other stuff you really should not do if you want to keep the map
unbroken.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op di 14 jul. 2020 om 18:05 schreef Peter Elderson :
> Just two outers is a regular use of multipolygon.
> If the tags of two areas are the same, you can represent
Sure! I was just sidestepping about the parking lot example.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op di 14 jul. 2020 om 18:34 schreef Volker Schmidt :
> Sorry to keep riding this horse, but many of my examples have areas, ways
> and nodes as members, so they cannot be described by any kind of polygon.
I think the Why question comes first!
Best, Peter Elderson
Op di 21 jul. 2020 om 21:47 schreef Andy Townsend :
> On 21/07/2020 20:37, pangoSE wrote:
> >
> > Andy Townsend skrev: (21 juli 2020 13:31:45 CEST)
> >
> >> I've also been trying to add these
bicycle=leave
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op wo 22 jul. 2020 om 17:36 schreef Tod Fitch :
>
>
> On Jul 22, 2020, at 8:09 AM, Jmapb wrote:
>
> If this unfortunate tagging practice really needs to be preserved (the
> idea of retagging so many bicycle=no ways is certainly daunting) th
bicycle=leave
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op do 23 jul. 2020 om 23:32 schreef Mike Thompson :
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 2:34 PM Matthew Woehlke
> wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > ...but then your horse is a passenger in a vehicle. Otherwise that would
> > be like sa
er to
confirm the suggested future check_date or enter a better one.
Easy overpass queries can find objects past the check_date. Easy maps can
show objects past the check_date. It's all much simpler than searching
possibly complex history.
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op do 23 jul. 2020 om 18:08 schr
Op vr 24 jul. 2020 om 22:53 schreef Tobias Knerr :
> On 24.07.20 14:13, Peter Elderson wrote:
> > In comparable cases (non-OSM, but comparible checking schemes), I do not
> > record the date it has been checked, I record the future date when it
> > should be checked (again).
Op za 25 jul. 2020 om 13:07 schreef Andy Townsend :
>
> (re adding guideposts to route relations)
>
> On 21/07/2020 22:18, Peter Elderson wrote:
> > I think the Why question comes first.
Why do people in OSM map anything? I can't see any reason why I'd want
Op 25 jul. 2020 om 22:43 heeft Allroads het volgende
geschreven:
> So, now we need also a hard yes. That you must bring a bicycle with you.
That's an attribute of the bus service/transfer, not the road, I think.
>
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagg
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 25 jul. 2020 om 22:43 heeft Allroads het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> The earlier mentioned,
> bicycle=leave
> This is for me, leave the bicycle behind at the sign.
> More native English speakers can give a comment on that?
If you're not
I can see how an area such as a parking, a churchyard or pedestrian area
can be tree lined. A node feature, not so much.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op vr 14 aug. 2020 om 01:08 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdre...@gmail.com>:
> I’ve set up an initial documentation page for the t
re if it's on a separate tree_line page.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op vr 14 aug. 2020 om 01:08 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdre...@gmail.com>:
> I’ve set up an initial documentation page for the tree_lined attribute
> (used mainly in conjunction with highways and waterways) an
Martin Koppenhoefer:
> I think we can assume that a line of trees in the middle is sufficient to
> make mappers use 2 highways instead of 1!? How can we distinguish between
> the following sections
> tree - road - tree - road - tree
> and
> tree - road - tree - tree - road - tree
> and
> tree - ro
Two dots are used in some circles to indicate inclusive range. eg 21..27.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op wo 19 aug. 2020 om 00:25 schreef Tod Fitch :
>
> On Aug 18, 2020, at 2:29 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
>
>
> Maybe we should use a different character to indicate a range, such as a
>
footway on bridge construction, so highway=footway, bridge=yes seems ok.
Canopy walkway is the term I see used everywhere, not canopy bridge.
Makes sense to attach the canopy detail to the footway then. So
footway=canopy_walkway sounds right to me.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op vr 21 aug. 2020 om
Nederland: stoeprand (/stooprund/); officially: trottoirband
(/trotwharbund/)
I wonder what it is in Burundi and Iceland.
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op vr 21 aug. 2020 om 09:39 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdre...@gmail.com>:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > O
Do we tag
highway=motor ?
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 22 aug. 2020 om 00:37 heeft Andy Mabbett het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 21:44, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
>>> highway=trunk_hghway
>
>> these are different because it would
render canopy_walkways specifically.
Best Peter Elderson
Op za 22 aug. 2020 om 11:16 schreef Jake Edmonds via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org>:
> Should the key be bridge?
> I feel like canopy walkways are more like bridges than boardwalks.
>
> Sent from Jake Edmonds
The British really call bench construction "architecture"? Amazing. I can see
this going the same way as village green.
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 23 aug. 2020 om 22:59 heeft Andy Townsend het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> On 23/08/2020 21:22, Joseph Eisenberg wrote
Wouln't it be more osm to describe visible and verifiable attributes of
features, rather than architectural design principles or supposed intentions?
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 24 aug. 2020 om 12:11 heeft Florian Lohoff het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at
>
> how could you change the definition of an undocumented tag?
>
Easy. It happens all the time, you just never hear about it.
___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
_
tags of the ways.
editors, QA-tools and datausers would have to handle the role.
It fits in nicely with the accepted roles for recreational routes,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roles_for_recreational_route_relations
Best, Peter Elderson
Op zo 30 aug. 2020 om 11:26 schreef Francesco
True. In that case, a transfer relation in a superroute is necessary. Like
all the other roles: do not combine these roles on ways with with
forward/backward, use a relation instead.
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op zo 30 aug. 2020 om 12:06 schreef Jo :
> Hi Francesco,
>
> I will create the s
I think the transfer section only needs the role transfer. The exact way of
transport there is tagged on the child relation which is a route in itself.
(type=route, route=*).
Peter Elderson
Op zo 30 aug. 2020 om 13:11 schreef Jo :
> I was in a hurry to go and eat and forgot to say this:
>
should appear in both routes involved.
*| transfer | Route section where a different mode of transport is
necessary, e.g. cable car transfer in a hikingh trail, train transfer in a
bicycle route, bus transfer through a tunnel. A transfer section is an
integral part of the route. |*
Best, Peter
the child relation, you don't need to specify that in
the role.
This is valid for many route types. I would suggest not to present it as a
complex bicycle route, but as a way to incorporate transfer sections of
different types in routes of any transport type.
Best, Peter Elderson
Op zo 3
well, how would you
combine this? Multiple roles are currently not defined.
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op ma 31 aug. 2020 om 08:16 schreef Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
> On 31/8/20 8:25 am, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> > Keep it simple, if the simple solution does not limit you.
> >
Jo:
> I added that it's not needed for ferries in the proposal on the wiki. It's
> alright if we have more than 1 way to do it and leave it up to the mapper
> to decide whether to map as a single route relation or split them and use a
> superroute relation.
>
Wouldn't this apply to other transfer
rail
to be followed exactly. I don't think roles in fixed route relations will
solve the instant routing challenge!
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 09:53, Peter Elderson wrote:
>
>> Jo:
>>
>>> I added that it's not needed for ferries in the proposal on the wiki.
>>
Focus?
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 11 sep. 2020 om 20:40 heeft Paul Allen het volgende
> geschreven:
>
>
>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 19:09, Martin Koppenhoefer
>> wrote:
>
>> > Themed implies that is the raison d'etre for the pubs existance and you
>
.
I'm not sure how to tag solar terrace orientation and terrace cover type,
though
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op za 12 sep. 2020 om 11:01 schreef Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org>:
>
>
>
> 12 Sep 2020, 00:50 by graemefi...@gmail.com:
>
>
>
=pathtocrosstheroadmarkedwithstripeslikeazebratograntprioritytopedestrians?
Peter Elderson
>> Op 16 sep. 2020 om 23:47 heeft Graeme Fitzpatrick
>> het volgende geschreven:
>
>
>
>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 20:01, Martin Koppenhoefer
>> wrote:
>> while the very generic crossing=marked, which was quite unp
In Nederland, the zebra is a very clear and specific type of crossing with
legal rules including yield to pedestrians walking on or even toward the
zebra.
I think this will continue to be the case even after Europe leaves the
British Union.
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op do 17 sep. 2020 om 20:12
ions separately and precisely.
Changing to crossing=marked then specifying that it's a zebra just makes it
more work, and harder to interpret.
Vr gr Peter Elderson___
> Tagging mailing list
> T
Wouldn't that just duplicate the location systems they offer? And on top of
that, a sizable maintenance burden to keep up with the changes? Who is
going to want this on OSM after committing to a chain?
Best, Peter Elderson
Op za 19 sep. 2020 om 13:02 schreef Jake Edmonds via Tagging <
exceptions.
Currently I do map short footways/paths where I know pedestrians will cross the
road, even when no physically marked crossing exists. Opposite lowered kerbs or
the fact that nearby dirt paths exists at both sides, not too far apart,
already is a luxury.
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 21
I have heard mourning chapel, mourning room, funeral chapel, funeral room.
Chapel of rest does not seem right to me, though I understand how the
funeral business would like that term better.
But I'm not a native speaker. PCMIIW.
Peter Elderson
Op ma 21 sep. 2020 om 21:14 schreef :
>
Jeroen Hoek :
> I have been applying highway=cycleway + cycleway=link as well to see how
> this feels. Some early documentation I have been preparing:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:JeroenHoek#cycleway.3Dlink
>
Why the diagonal link to the center intersection node?
Wouldn't it be mo
I would suggest respectorium, but I do not want to start a new hype in the
funeral branch.
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 25 sep. 2020 om 17:10 heeft woll...@posteo.de het volgende geschreven:
>
> "Wake rooms" was at one time my favorite, but then I was told that some
>
Funeral viewing room sounds like a room where you can view the funeral. I
suspect modern ones have very large screens and nice sound effects.
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 27 sep. 2020 om 19:39 heeft woll...@posteo.de het volgende geschreven:
>
> "In any case, the proposer seems to fe
Clifford Snow :
> I'm not sure there would be a consensus agreement to revise the wiki to
> indicate landuse=forest should be used for timber production. Thoughts?
>
I am sure there would not. landuse=forest just means the area has trees. I
think there is some consensus about that.
natural=fores
What about the many streets and roads where the kerb or lining is bended
and curled to cut the parking lane into sections?
Best, Peter Elderson
Op di 29 sep. 2020 om 11:40 schreef Supaplex :
> Now I am a little confused.
>
> As I understand Pieter, you used "width:carriageway&q
I think for tagging it should be more than the occasional road-side sale?
Best, Peter Elderson
Op za 3 okt. 2020 om 14:38 schreef Paul Allen :
> On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 at 13:22, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
>>
>> shop=* seems ok for me.
>
>
> And for me. There
Is it private sale?
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op za 3 okt. 2020 om 23:37 schreef Graeme Fitzpatrick :
>
>
>
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 00:39, Paul Allen wrote:
>
>>
>> More important is if there is a sign,
>>
>
> Hand-painted signs saying "Horse manure&
Would that be a new sub-tag or a value of an existing sub-tag?
Best, Peter Elderson
Op di 6 okt. 2020 om 09:27 schreef Jez Nicholson :
> Myself, I would prefer *not* to have a new tag. Swapping a battery is a
> form of recharging and can be detailed in a subtag.
>
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2
Another illusion shattered... where is this world going to?
Best, Peter Elderson
> Op 19 okt. 2020 om 13:48 heeft Jo het volgende
> geschreven:
>
>
> It would be best to first consider the consequences of such a change. Weigh
> the benefits against what we lose in time
1 - 100 of 1065 matches
Mail list logo
