The page describes a common role set and comes with a tagging instruction, for all types of recreational routes, except where a more specific role set has been approved.
It is *not* for other types of routes, such as PT routes, road routes, and what have you, even though some role values may be used in e.g. functional bicycle routes (bicycle speedways/preferred cycle routes). I think it's not practical to repeat all of it on the pages of all the route types within scope. Currently these pages refer to the proposal page from a brief paragraph in the "how to tag" sections. For example: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Tagging_scheme_for_hiking_and_foot_route_relations#Roles Best, Peter Elderson Op vr 26 jun. 2020 om 17:22 schreef Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de>: > On 25.06.20 19:46, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > > Should individual pages for these roles be located at something like > > Role:main and Role:alternative? > > So far, I believe roles are typically documented on the wiki page for > the relation type, rather than their own pages. I don't think there's an > established convention for wiki pages about individual roles yet. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
