Jan 24, 2020, 13:50 by pla16...@gmail.com:
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 10:06, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <>
> tagging@openstreetmap.org> > wrote:
>
>>
>> && Deleting a non-functioning fountain node, is discouraged
>> But in case of removed structure deletion
>> of node is encouraged.
>>
>
>
On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 10:06, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> && Deleting a non-functioning fountain node, is discouraged
> But in case of removed structure deletion
> of node is encouraged.
>
There are some (I'm one of them) who would say that if the fount
23 Jan 2020, 19:14 by europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com:
> operation_status = XXX - for fountains which are not operational on a
> specific sighting
>
In such case I would add an OSM note
and ask for a resurvey.
And report issue to local government.
With this tag it is hard to guess
whatever it
Hello,
To summarize the discussion so far :
All the following are acceptable ways to tag a fountain :
operation_status = XXX - for fountains which are not operational on a
specific sighting
disused:--- when the observation or observations leads the mapper to
believe there is a good chance
sent from a phone
> On 20. Jan 2020, at 16:34, marc marc wrote:
>
> but to switch to disused: if there's no water on the day of the survey,
> I think that's excessive.
for the drinking fountains in my area seeing there is no water does indeed
justify to put it on disused, while it’s in theo
Dear Marc/Martin,
Would it be possible to prepare a "best practice" proposal for how
fountains which are temporarily not working should be tagged ?
If so, how can I create the wiki template to be filled in - I am happy to
work on the first draft.
I am quite agnostic about which solution is chose
I'm using operation_status when I see a such one.
and I'm trying to survey again later to see if it was a temporary
problem or if it's disused:
but to switch to disused: if there's no water on the day of the survey,
I think that's excessive.
Le 20.01.20 à 15:59, European Water Project a écrit :
>
Hi Martin,
disused:amenity=drinking_water is very good.
Is this documented as best practice for drinking fountains which are not
running without explanation?
How do you document an out of ourder tagged fountain which was
"amenity=fountain && drinking_water=yes" ? disused:drinking_water=yes ?
Be
Am Mo., 20. Jan. 2020 um 16:01 Uhr schrieb European Water Project <
europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com>:
> Wouldn't it make more sense for mappers to tag status=broken or status=out
> _of_order instead of deleting ?
>
personally I have changed them to "disused:amenity=drinking_water" (and
back then)
Dear Martin,
Wouldn't it make more sense for mappers to tag status=broken or status=out_
of_order instead of deleting ?
best regards,
Stuart
On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 15:53, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> Am Do., 16. Jan. 2020 um 03:16 Uhr schrieb Jarek Piórkowski <
> ja...@piorkowski.ca>:
>
>> Ah
Am Do., 16. Jan. 2020 um 03:16 Uhr schrieb Jarek Piórkowski <
ja...@piorkowski.ca>:
> Ah, good point! So I guess for a drinking fountain seasonal=yes is the
> most reasonable when I don't know the months when it's active (I'm in
> a climate that freezes, so they get shut down sometime before that)
Am Do., 16. Jan. 2020 um 02:53 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg <
joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>:
> > seasonal=summer
>
> Well, this is the problem with the tag "seasonal" - it's not 100%
> clear if "seasonal=summer" means "this feature is only available in
> the summer" or "this feature is NOT available
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 00:51, European Water Project
wrote:
>>5. Re: Query regarding seasonal tag combined for outdoor water
>> fountains. (Jarek Piórkowski)
>> Jarek, I think preferable to avoid seasons on open hours and put
>> month range to avoid Northern/Southern hemisphere
Le 16.01.20 à 02:52, Joseph Eisenberg a écrit :
> The simple "seasonal=yes/no" is at least clear, though with natural
> features "intermittent=yes/no" is more common and has a similar
> meaning.
I see a big difference between the two:
an intermittent water point provides water today but not tomorr
u, 16 Jan 2020 10:52:29 +0900
> From: Joseph Eisenberg
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Query regarding seasonal tag combined for
> outdoor water fountains.
> Message-ID:
> x5bzo6rqxhmild...@mail.g
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 20:52, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> > seasonal=summer
>
> Well, this is the problem with the tag "seasonal" - it's not 100%
> clear if "seasonal=summer" means "this feature is only available in
> the summer" or "this feature is NOT available in the summer".
Ah, good point! So
> seasonal=summer
Well, this is the problem with the tag "seasonal" - it's not 100%
clear if "seasonal=summer" means "this feature is only available in
the summer" or "this feature is NOT available in the summer".
As mentioned on the wiki page "Note these values can be ambiguous for
features that
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 01:19, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> On 1/15/20, European Water Project wrote:
> > Would it be appropriate to use the tag "seasonal" for a water fountain
> > (whether tagged as "amenity=drinking_water" or "amenity = fountain and
> > drinking_water = yes" )?
>
> Since drinking f
On 1/15/2020 10:26 AM, marc marc wrote:
Le 15.01.20 à 16:15, Jmapb via Tagging a écrit :
Don't forget about man_made=drinking_fountain!
omg, what's the diff with amenity=drinking_water ?
the direction of water flow upwards?
348 out of 371 objects also have an amenity tag, which
shows the prob
On Wednesday, 15 January 2020, marc marc wrote:
> Le 15.01.20 à 16:15, Jmapb via Tagging a écrit :
> > On 1/15/2020 12:55 AM, European Water Project wrote:
> >> Would it be appropriate to use the tag "seasonal" for a water fountain
> >> (whether tagged as "amenity=drinking_water" or "amenity = fo
Le 15.01.20 à 16:15, Jmapb via Tagging a écrit :
> On 1/15/2020 12:55 AM, European Water Project wrote:
>> Would it be appropriate to use the tag "seasonal" for a water fountain
>> (whether tagged as "amenity=drinking_water" or "amenity = fountain and
>> drinking_water = yes" )?
>
> Don't forget a
On 1/15/2020 12:55 AM, European Water Project wrote:
Would it be appropriate to use the tag "seasonal" for a water fountain
(whether tagged as "amenity=drinking_water" or "amenity = fountain and
drinking_water = yes" )?
Don't forget about man_made=drinking_fountain!
J
___
Le 15.01.20 à 06:55, European Water Project a écrit :
> Would it be appropriate to use the tag "seasonal" for a water fountain
yes I think so.
I'm going to check/survey the nearby fountains: some are closed
in winter but don't have a precise opening/closing date.
__
According to the wiki page for "service_times":
"The key service_times=* is generally used for the times of service of
a given feature, if this is different from the opening hours or if a
special service (like in the case of churches) is offered in this
time. Otherwise please use opening_hours=*."
Am Mi., 15. Jan. 2020 um 07:20 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg <
joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>:
> Since drinking fountains are man-made rather than natural features,
> they usually have a date when they are turned on or off.
>
> This can be specified with the key "opening_hours=*" - this is the
> commo
On 15/1/20 4:55 pm, European Water Project wrote:
Dear All,
Would it be appropriate to use the tag "seasonal" for a water fountain
(whether tagged as "amenity=drinking_water" or "amenity = fountain and
drinking_water = yes" )?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:seasonal
On the natural
Since drinking fountains are man-made rather than natural features,
they usually have a date when they are turned on or off.
This can be specified with the key "opening_hours=*" - this is the
common British English term used to say "when is this this feature
open and available".
See https://wiki.
27 matches
Mail list logo
