Hi Martin, disused:amenity=drinking_water is very good.
Is this documented as best practice for drinking fountains which are not running without explanation? How do you document an out of ourder tagged fountain which was "amenity=fountain && drinking_water=yes" ? disused:drinking_water=yes ? Best regards, Stuart On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 16:10, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Am Mo., 20. Jan. 2020 um 16:01 Uhr schrieb European Water Project < > europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com>: > >> Wouldn't it make more sense for mappers to tag status=broken or status= >> out_of_order instead of deleting ? >> > > > personally I have changed them to "disused:amenity=drinking_water" (and > back then). > The problem with additional status qualifiers is that dataconsumers must > be aware of them (usually none is aware and all continue to show drinking > water where the currently isn't). > > Certainly, deleting isn't a good option, and we discourage it for cases > like this (I guess it IS indeed discouraged). > > Cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
