On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 10:06, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> > && Deleting a non-functioning fountain node, is discouraged > But in case of removed structure deletion > of node is encouraged. > There are some (I'm one of them) who would say that if the fountain is likely to be remapped because there are many images of it on the web, then it is better to retain the node and apply a removed: lifecycle prefix to it (and possibly a note, explaining things). Others will strongly disagree, saying that OSM doesn't map history and ignoring that this is actually a quality assurance mechanism. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
