Le 14/12/2023 à 19:51, Nathan Simington via Starlink a écrit :
Hi folks,
(Apologies in advance to non-Americans or anyone who doesn't care
about American home broadband policy! Please feel free to immediately
delete!)
I don't want to get overly political on this mailing list, but my
statem
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:07:10PM +0100, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote:
> subscriber ; they light only one, equalling 1gbit/s. It means that they could
> scale it up later to 4 or 5 gbit/s, without additional installation. At the
You do not need multiple fibers to transfer more tha
Le 15/12/2023 à 13:37, Gert Doering a écrit :
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:07:10PM +0100, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote:
subscriber ; they light only one, equalling 1gbit/s. It means that they could
scale it up later to 4 or 5 gbit/s, without additional installation. At the
You do
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:43:25PM +0100, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
> So, a requirement to a competitive satcom would be like 25 Gbit/s. I think it
> is not impossible to make, if many intermediate layers (HAPS, drones etc)
> are used, and larger band widths.
As was noted upthread, raw bandw
>
> Thus, technically speaking, one would like the advantages of satcom such
> as starlink, to be at least 5gbit/s in 10 years time, to overcome the
> 'tangled fiber' problem.
No, not really. Starlink was about to address the issue of digital divide -
delivering internet to those 640k locations,
Hi Alexandre,
> On Dec 15, 2023, at 13:07, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink
> wrote:
>
>
> Le 14/12/2023 à 19:51, Nathan Simington via Starlink a écrit :
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> (Apologies in advance to non-Americans or anyone who doesn't care about
>> American home broadband policy! Please feel
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:46:06PM +0100, Frantisek Borsik via Starlink wrote:
> The same is true for missing/loosing support for FWA in the grand/funding
> schemes: all the arguments thrown around by fiber cheerleaders are based
> on bandwidth (at best) or "speed" (in most cases) or some the
Hi Frantisek,
> On Dec 15, 2023, at 13:46, Frantisek Borsik via Nnagain
> wrote:
>
> Thus, technically speaking, one would like the advantages of satcom such
> as starlink, to be at least 5gbit/s in 10 years time, to overcome the
> 'tangled fiber' problem.
>
> No, not really. Starlink was a
On 12/15/23, 07:44, "Starlink on behalf of Gert Doering via Starlink" wrote:
> As was noted upthread, raw bandwith is not the only relevant criteria
here (and nobody really *needs* 25 Gbit/s at home, though I'd *love* to
have it).
Agree 100%. At the recent IETF meeting, we had over 1,000 devices
The RDOF criteria was initially 25/3 Mb/s. Now the FCC questions Starlink's
ability to provide 100/20 Mbps. When and why did the criteria change?
Larry
___
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starl
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-395473A1.pdf
On 12/15/23 08:41, Larry Press via Starlink wrote:
The RDOF criteria was initially 25/3 Mb/s. Now the FCC questions
Starlink's ability to provide 100/20 Mbps. When and why did the
criteria change?
Larry
___
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023, Sebastian Moeller via Starlink wrote:
Hi Frantisek,
On Dec 15, 2023, at 13:46, Frantisek Borsik via Nnagain
wrote:
Thus, technically speaking, one would like the advantages of satcom such
as starlink, to be at least 5gbit/s in 10 years time, to overcome the
'tangled
Hi All,
We're trying to modernize America. LBJ helped do it for electricity
decades ago. It's our turn to step up to the plate. Tele-health and
distance learning requires us to do so. There is so much to follow.
A reminder what many women went through before LBJ showed up. I'm
skeptical a pa
who exactly do you think is calling for there to be no Internet access? and what
in the world does the sex of individuals have to do with shipping bits around?
Starlink (and hopefully it's future competitors) provides a way to get Internet
service to everyone without having to run fiber to ever
Women are the primary users and providers of telehealth services. They
are using broadband to care for our population. They also run most of
the addiction services across our country, whatever the addiction may
be. So gender actually matters. Ask them as providers. Telehealth
doesn't work over
why do you think telehealth won't work over LEO services?
I've used it personally.
Even if women use telehealth more than men, that doesn't say that women have any
particular advantage in moving the bits around that make telehealth possible.
David Lang
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023, rjmcmahon wrote:
I surveyed some female telehealth providers. There are a lot of
subtleties required to make telehealth work well for the providers.
Their knowledge level is quite fascinating.
I don't see their voices here on these boards either. In education, the
absence of something being taught is called th
I don't disagree with anything that you say below, but the discussion was on the
topic of starlink vs fiber, with the person I was responding to claiming that we
needed to have women in charge of the Internet companies because of telehealth
as well.
I'm a remote worker and VERY aware of how li
what does this have to do with starlink vs FTTH?
I don't know or care the sex of the other people in this discussion, I could
make guesses based on the listed names for some, but by no means all, but why
would I?
This discussion is open to anyone.
David Lang
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023, rjmcmahon w
This is principally a male dominated list, and I in general assume
that the public debate over fiber, bandwidth, etc, etc skews heavily
male also.
It is a very good set of questions to ask about how the internet
should be structured to best meet the needs of both sexes, and how
that has changed ov
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 2:13 PM David Bray, PhD via Nnagain
wrote:
>
> This GPT(human)bot was responding to the engineered prompt: >>why do you
> think telehealth won't work over LEO services?
>
> As it's Friday, this GPT(human)bot bandwidth has been fully utilized for the
> week. Our servers w
FCC's staff continues to shrink. 1420-or-so employees in 2022, 1755-or-so
in 2012, 1952-or-so in 2004. So about a 25% reduction over the last twenty
years. There are several good people there among the staff, however they
also face an increasing number of tasks and demands with less resources.
Publ
There’s good evidence that physical health can be done over LEO as long as
it isn’t low latency dependent. Of course our illustrious listserv founder
Dave Taht will be quick to point out high latency is also found via
ground-based connections too.
That said, there is still a lot of research debate
I’m a Return-to-Office worker and we come in to the office to do our in-person
meetings on Zoom.
The conference rooms are only used for storage now.
Doug
From: Nnagain On Behalf Of David Bray,
PhD via Nnagain
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2023 5:13 PM
To: David Lang
Cc: David Bray, PhD ; star
This GPT(human)bot was responding to the engineered prompt: >>why do you
think telehealth won't work over LEO services?
As it's Friday, this GPT(human)bot bandwidth has been fully utilized for
the week. Our servers will be back-on line come Monday.
Wishing everyone (human or machine) a wonderful
to be very clear, I am in no way saying that anyone's (let alone saying women's)
views are not desired. I think a diversity of views if extremely valuable.
I just get my back up when people say things like 'there need to more X in
charge' (for any value of X that refers to a characteristic that
26 matches
Mail list logo
