Folks:
Has anybody created rule to "score"
the obscuration technique that is "tunneling" through bayes? What were your
results (more false positives for SPAM)?
Mark M.
Hello and thanks for spamassassin! :)
I discovered your package yesterday on the vmailmgr mailing
list, and I'm now using it with qmail+qmail-scanner: works
great!
Now a little suggestion (but maybe it's already corrected):
I have messages which are travelling twice on the server,
and it's then
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:53:09PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 08:42:30PM +0100, Olivier M. wrote:
> > three *SPAM* in their Subject. Shouldn't SA check if
> > there is already a "X-Spam-Flag" line in the headers, and
>
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 10:42:41AM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote:
> As others have mentioned: It's hard to reliably be sure that a message
> has((n't)?) been scanned before. My system might scan the message before
> forwarding on to your system, for instance.
>
> What I'd recommend is -NOT- using th
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:13:05PM -0500, dman wrote:
> bodyDEAR_SIR_MADAM_b/Dear Sir\/Madam:/
> describeDEAR_SIR_MADAM_bMessage contains "Dear Sir/Madam:"
> score DEAR_SIR_MADAM_b2.0
Mmm, it would catch many of my "non-spam" mails... So ok, but
with a score of 0.5 m
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 11:44:44AM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote:
> > couldn't hurt, don't you think? But that was just an idea :)
>
> You using procmail for delivery? Just include that logic there - don't
> pass it through spamassassin again if that header exists.
nope, using qmail-scanner, which
Hi, FYI, install Mail::Spamassassin (via cpan) never worked on the systems
I'm using (Suse linux-7.3 based): it always finish this way:
t/forged_rcvd...ok
t/nonspam...ok
t/re
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:38:12AM -0500, Chin, Nelson wrote:
> I currently have a qmail+qmailscanner+sophos antivirus setup on redhat. How
> do I integrate spamassassin? Their website doesn't have any docs with that
> combination.
it's pretty easy: use this patch for spamassassin, and start the
Hello,
Would it be possible to add an option to spamc, for example -r,
which would set/overwrite the required score (defaults 5.0) to
make a mail defined as spam?
I'd like to call spamc from a program which already know this
information, and would not like to create an unix user per
mailbox o
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 02:01:30AM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Probably the best way would be to use sql, or write another
well, using sql is exactely the thing I'd like to avoid... :)
Olivier
--
_
Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECT
From the lack of response to my posting I'm guessing the list is as
perplexed as I am about the problem I've described.
.\\ichelle
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Michelle Brownsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [SAtalk] SA + procmail are blocking non-spam mail
>Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 17:03:41
Is the following line from the non-spam procmail log entry a clue?
procmail: Bypassed locking "/var/mail/mdb.lock"
Should it be able to lock my mailbox file? And what are the
implications if it can't?
.\\ichelle
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Michelle Brownsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subj
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 11:01:32AM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> I just created a new moderated mailing list on SourceForge for project
good idea :)
maybe you can add infos about this new ML on the spamassassin.org page...
> announcements. I think I configured it right. Anyway, go ahead and s
Suppose a recipient wanted a message that had been marked as spam by
mistake, intercepted, and archived. Is there a way to deliver this
specific message to the recipient, preventing it from being
intercepted again? It would involve circumventing spamd's scanning
this message so that it can b
>On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 11:54:55AM -0700, M. Brownsworth wrote:
>> Suppose a recipient wanted a message that had been marked as spam by
>> mistake, intercepted, and archived. Is there a way to deliver this
>> specific message to the recipient, preventing it from being
>Michelle --
>
>...and then M. Brownsworth said...
>%
>% Suppose a recipient wanted a message that had been marked as spam by
>% mistake, intercepted, and archived. Is there a way to deliver this
>% specific message to the recipient, preventing it from being
>
>Al
David T-G spaketh:
>% Some good info and suggestions in your reply. What do you think of
>
>Happy to help!
>
>% this brute-force approach?
>
>Hrmmm...
>
>% $cf = '/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf';
>% system("cp -p $cf ${cf}.tmp"); # Preserve original
>% open(CF, ">>$cf") || die "Can't open $cf
>On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, M. Brownsworth wrote:
>
>> Suppose a recipient wanted a message that had been marked as spam by
>> mistake, intercepted, and archived. Is there a way to deliver this
>> specific message to the recipient, preventing it from being
>> int
When spamassissin gets invoked by procmail, I get the following in the
procmail log file:
.
.
procmail: Locking "/home/footoo/spamassassin.lock"
procmail: Error while writing to "/usr/local/perl/bin/spamassassin"
procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data failed
procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data faile
All the documentation for version 2.60 says that autowhitelist is turned on
by default and that by default the autowhitelist is stored in each users
config directory (e.g. ~/.spamassassin/autowhitelist)
When I installed spamassissin, it installed with no problem and is doing a
great job of filt
Title: auto_learn without "sa-learn"-feeding ?
Dear List,
I'm new to Spamassassin and it's great. But I've got a
little understanding problem, where the doc's and FAQ
doesn't help. I want to implement Spamassassin with
Bayes on a Postfix machine with amavisd-new.
Since it's only a Gat
Hi everyone,
I am a newbie to spamassassin but managed to install
it and am successfully running it right now. At my
work place we have multiple servers on which we would
like to install spamassassin to filter out SPAM. We do
not have a centralised mail server where filtering is
done. Right now i
y not to get rid of the headers for the
specific user ?
TIA
karthik
--- "Christopher M. Iarocci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I am a newbie to spamassassin but managed to
> install
> > it and am successfully runni
>It is completely automatic, you may want to change the threshholds, spam is ok but
>you dont get much ham by default.
>An easier way to seed the bayes is to whitelist some of your clients.
sounds good ... and where is all information stored ?
in "bayes_path" ? when i don't use the sa-learn
comm
Hi ML,
I always read about AWL and auto_learn. But will
SA auto_learn from the manual blacklist settings
in local.cf ?
THX
- Michael
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hostin
'bonjour,
I'm using SA with a mysql database for a few months, and I
wanted to test the bayes system.
Unfortunately, the spamd is reporting that:
Jul 3 01:24:30 omega spamd[21676]: debug: retrieving prefs for [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
SQL server
Jul 3 01:24:30 omega spamd[21676]: debug: Failed
hello,
I'm using SA with a mysql database for a few months, and I
wanted to test the bayes system.
Unfortunately, the spamd is reporting that:
Jul 3 01:24:30 omega spamd[21676]: debug: retrieving prefs for [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
SQL server
Jul 3 01:24:30 omega spamd[21676]: debug: Failed to
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:37:38PM -0400, Greg Cirino wrote:
> bayes is only system wide when using a database
you mean it would be possible already now, if I use
a DB instead of the bayes_ files ?
Sounds good, would also be fine... I'll have a look and
try to find some more docs about that, th
If spamd is started with the -D switch, i.e.:
/usr/bin/spamd -d -D -F 1
...where will the debugging info be written -- to the syslog,
console, message headers, or a file somewhere?
.\\ichelle
-
Michelle Brownsworth
System Administrator
PrimeLogic Corporation
http://www.p
I'm running spamd 2.20 as root on a FreeBSD 4.5 server, with
system-wide filtering. It seems to be disregarding anything in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. Yesterday, I added my address as
"all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]," but spamd/procmail then
subsequently filtered and intercepted numerou
Theo Van Dinter writes:
>HUPping spamd won't do anything for you, you have to fully stop/start it.
>In fact, sending it a HUP causes it to die because there's no handler
>for it.
That's too bad. It would be useful to be able to force spamd to
reread its configuration file without having to k
> > Has the possibility of
>> using the envelope headers instead been suggested to Craig Hughes?
>
>Not all mail system tells you what is the enveloppe. Unless your mail
>system has a way to include the enveloppe inside the message headers,
>then SA will not know about it.
>
>But if your goal is
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 02:25:49PM +0300, Marko Asplund wrote:
> i'm trying to install SpamAssasin v2.31 on a Red Hat 6.2 machine. make
> succeeds but make test fails with lots of error messages saying:
> t/db_based_whitelist.Can't locate Pod/Usage.pm in @INC
> any ideas on what's going wrong? i u
Is there a way to round robin, using
spamc/spamd
to have it use more then 1 spamd
server
Folks,
I have an odd one to report. I've been using SpamAssassin 2.20
(running as spamd) for months now without a problem. Last week, I
added a few whitelist_to and whitelist_from entries to
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, in this format:
whitelist_to *@todomain.com
Spamassassin seems to b
Theo Van Dinter says:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 08:41:43PM -0800, M. Brownsworth wrote:
> Note that it does report "USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO," but it still doesn't
add -100 to keep the score below the 5.0 threshold. Experimenting, I
Of course not, the score for USER_IN_WHITELI
Turns out "all_spam_to" was my friend. I'd still like to know why
"whitelist_to" had absolutely no effect whatsoever.
.\\ichelle
Folks,
I have an odd one to report. I've been using SpamAssassin 2.20
(running as spamd) for months now without a problem. Last week, I
added a few whitelist_to
Hello,
I'd like to use spamc with mail users administred by vmailmgr:
only one unix user for a whole domain. Problem: I need separate
white/blacklists for each mail account: how could this
be solved ? Maybe using an sql backend and more parameters ?
Thanks for any hint :)
Olivier
--
Good morning,
I see there is good vpopmail support in spamassassin, and would
need something similar for vmailmgr (qmail addon like vpopmail):
is there already somebody working on this "case", or some code
available ? Found nothing searching with google, but maybe there
is devel in progress somew
Now with spamc -c, only 2 int are returned. What about
returning the whole details, like:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.4 required=5.0
tests=CLICK_BELOW,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12,EXCUSE_3,EXCUSE_FUTURE,
FROM_AND_TO_SAME_5,HTTP_USERNAME_USED,
INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSUR
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:10:15PM -0500, David Gladstone wrote:
> i am a user of spamassassin and would like to have spamassassin send a
> response to the spammer and the recivere of the spam when it recives spam.
and to which address would you send the response ? The reply-to and from:
addresse
We have spam
assassin running, some users didnt get spam before hand and I wanted to know if
there is a ignore_usr option to completely ignore specified email addresses?
Thanks
/mail/mbox so that i can process.
thanks and regards
M H Raju
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything fro
I ussuaky will download the file to another file name in the SA config
directory, than cat them all together and run lint on them *just in
case*. If lint fails I do not switch to the new file.
Steve
Chris Petersen wrote:
MAN, that's a lot of code for such a simple task. mine is just:
#!/bin
en if
trusting the IP of the relaying server works I'd still have to track all of
them down - yes?
Or am I missing something?
m/
Please don't top post.
No, you're not missing anything. This is a known bug in SA 2.6X.
People saying to add your IP to trusted_networks are not
Hi.
I started using SA a year ago. I use it in a site-wide confuguration-
spamd + milter + sendmail.
Now I noticed that the amount of spam written in russian increased, and
from this time I need to filter it.
Since 90% of the mail on my relay is in russian (cp1251/koi8-r) I can't
simply say in
Good morning,
I have just upgraded my mail server from Solaris 8 to Solaris 9, and am
using spamd/spamc v2.63 with default compile (only PREFIX=/usr/local).
spamd is set to communicate over a socket, /var/run/spamd.socket.
Since my upgrade this morning, ALL mail sent to spamd from spamc re
Hello, The setup I used was for spamassassin was easier to setup but
will not scale for more than a medium sized business:
in /etc/postfix/aliases setup the email like so:
user: "| /usr/bin/spamassassin -P -F1 >/path/to/local/mailbox"
user1: "| /usr/bin/spamassassin -P -F0 | /usr/sbin/sendmail
oohoo!
I would be happy to send gifts (money gift certificates, pizza, etc) to
the primary people responsible for this product, just give me addresses.
Thanks!
Dannie
--
Dannie M Stanley
SpinWeb Net Designs, Inc.
http://www.spinweb.net
"If you give an infinite number of monkeys an infinite
Hello,
I'm installing spamassassin and am having a little problem with the
final installation. The testing of the sample spam and non-spam files
included in the distribution went fine. However, I am trying to
implement it on a test account first to see if it works. The lines I
put in my pr
I am trying to run SpamAssassin with MailScanner and Exim, which must be a
common scenario
When I start it up, I get the error message
mkdir /root/.spamassassin: Permission denied at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 614
This is presumably because MailScanner is set to run
Anybody have Exim and SA running as a SPAM filtering/blocking gateway that
would want to share their configs with me, and knowledge for that matter?
I'm a qmail person myself, but this latest server I'm building requires
blocking of email, not just filtering, and I was advised that EXIM was the
rig
Will Postfix block email at the SMTP level if the email reaches a score I
specify, or at least block it from being delivered to the POP server that
sits behind it?
Chris
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.507 / Viru
Chris,
Will Postfix block email at the SMTP level if the email reaches a score I
specify, or at least block it from being delivered to the POP server that
sits behind it?
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Covington, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Christophe
think that it would only attach the above text only if it was
likely that the email was spam.
Thanks for listening,
Dick
--
Richard M. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by Dice.com.
Did you know that Dice
> >>this latest server I'm building
> >>requires blocking of email, not just filtering
> >
> >I used [1] for exim3 but there is also a help for exim4 [2].
> >
> >[1] http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/config_docs/exim3_spamassassin.html
> >[2] http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/config_docs/exim4_spamassassin.htm
I use expire_mail.pl
I sort spam into users spam folders so they don't have to download via
pop
They can access with a web interface (or imap) to see the spam folder
and then every week I run a cron job to expire mail from every users
spam folders
It gives a summary of what was erased, showing t
>
> Martin Radford schrieb:
> [...]
> >>4) I am new to spamassassin. What parameter should I use in my
> >>configuration to cause spamassassin to stop using osirusoft open
relay?
> >
> > See the news article at http://news.spamassassin.org/
>
> The instructions given there can't work, IMHO, be
> > If performance is an issue, how about an option like...
> >
> > HIT_AND_RUN 1
> >
> > ...that would cause spamd to stop processing once your threshhold
had
> > been met? IOW why keep scanning text once the message has been
> > identified as spam? I'm sure that I'm missing something here but I'
First post, tried to find the answer
I had a rich text document come thru and was flagged with
"HTML has images with 600-800 bytes of words"
The document had no images.
What is being picked up?
Thanks
Tory
<|[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This
I tried to check time timelog to look at performance and check hit rates
for dcc, pyzor, razor, etc.
Only to find it has disappeared on me since I last used it.
It is still in the man page though
And the config options page was broken at SA.org
debug: Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin confi
test ideas: Presently the uppercase and HTML-tag percentage
of a message is checked, but has anyone tried a rule to detect the HTML
comment percentage? And how about an HTML_FONT_COLOR_WHITE? I've seen a
lot of spams hiding non-spammy words in a block.
Please be so kind as to Cc me on any r
I know this is probably more of a procmail issue but I'll ask anyway as
it involves Spamassassin.
This is how I call it from my main server for system wide use
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0
* ! ? test -f $HOME/.sabypass
{
:0fw
* < 256000
| /usr/bin/spamc -f -U /var/spool/spamassassin/spamd.sock
:0:
* ^X-S
need to use the "eval:check_rbl_txt" option instead for this
particular RBL? I'm a little confused, any help would be appreciated,
thanks.
Christopher M. Iarocci
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.5
> At 12:42 AM 10/3/03 -0400, Christopher M. Iarocci wrote:
> >Hi, I'm using SpamAssassin 2.60 being called through Amavisd-new.
Dynablock
> >(along with a few others) is scoring on lots of messages that it
shouldn't
> >because the first hop is a dial up. I put t
Hello all.
I just installed spamassassin. I used the sample ~/.procmailrc file.
I see the lines spamassassin adds to each received email header. Si I thought
I'd give it a little test and turn off the spam filters on one of the pop3 servers I
use to get my email.
This server usually gets a medio
Ooops. I got interrupted and forgot the script in my last post. Here it is:
# SpamAssassin sample procmailrc
#
# Pipe the mail through spamassassin (replace 'spamassassin' with 'spamc'
# if you use the spamc/spamd combination)
#
# The condition line ensures that only messages smaller than 250 kB
#
Hello all.
I'm a real spamassassin newbie. I'm using spamassassin version 2.60. My mail
is stored in /var/mail/david.
I recently received three non-spams. So I thought I give sa-learn a tryout.
This is what I did:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sa-learn --ham --mbox /var/mail/david
Learned from 0 message
I've only had spamassassin installed and operating for about 2 days.
I don't normally get a lot of spam, but it only seems to be stopping about
half of all the spams that hit my mailbox.
My ~/.procmailrc file is pretty much the sample that comes with the docs.
I am doing sa-learn on all the spam
I installed Spamassassin version 2.60 a few days ago. I don't get a lot of
spam, but I do get some.
So far, Spamassassin has only caught half the spam hitting my mailbox. I have
saved the spam that has gotten through and did a "sa-learn --spam "
on the saved spam.
Is 50% normal, or is there somet
Hi Scott --
When going through the SpamAssassin installation instructions here:
http://au.spamassassin.org/full/2.6x/dist/INSTALL
Are you absolutely sure you installed all the necessary CPAN packages
mentioned?
AMA
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Scott Kennedy wrote:
:For some reason razo
el Quinlan wrote:
> David M. Carney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I installed Spamassassin version 2.60 a few days ago. I don't get a lot of
> > spam, but I do get some.
> >
> > So far, Spamassassin has only caught half the spam hitting my mailbox. I
On 2003-10-16, Brian Sneddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you check the rule itself in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf you'll notice the
> -notfirsthop part of the argument to check_rbl_txt(). This tells
> SpamAssassin to check all hops except the first one for this match. As a
I wasn't even aware that thi
> At 03:10 PM 10/16/2003, Daniel M. Drucker wrote:
> >I wasn't even aware that this notfirsthop argument existed; as far as
> >I can tell in a few minutes of testing, the argument has no effect.
> >I've had to disable all dynamic-IP RBLs because of this proble
> On 2003-10-16, Brian Sneddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you check the rule itself in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf you'll notice the
> > -notfirsthop part of the argument to check_rbl_txt(). This tells
> > SpamAssassin to check all hops except the first one for this match. As
a
>
> I wasn't even
> Yes, the situation I'm talking about is lots of spamd processes running at
> once using lots of memory. (Not to mention the local delivery processes
> running at the same time as well)
>
> Spamd using 800MB of ram is a bug, and one which I've never encountered
> yet in months of using spamd, so i
>> I wasn't even aware that this notfirsthop argument existed; as far as I
can
>> tell in a few minutes of testing, the argument has no effect.
>> I've had to disable all dynamic-IP RBLs because of this problem...
> Out of curiosity, what method do you use to feed your email into
> SpamAssassin? D
(Running 2.60)
I'm having a problem where sometimes I end up with dozens of spamds
taking 100% CPU, driving my load average up to 50 or so.
Anyone else see this?
--
Daniel Drucker / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email sponsored by: Enter
> Have you tried starting spamd with the "-m" flag to limit
> the number of copies?
Yes, I have -m 10. It doesn't seem to have any effect.
> How much RAM are you using?
Unfortunately, I wasn't keeping track. Now I am: http://3e.org/perf/
I'm hoping this'
to
occasionally intervene (something as simple as a hot-key in their MUA)
to move and relearn anything SA got wrong.
Any info on the behavior I'm seeing would be appreciated.
--
Jeremy M. Dolan <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://jmd.us/>
PGP: 1024D/3C
Title: Message
What is the format
of the files of ham/spam fed to sa-learn? Can I use Outlook .pst
files?
Thanks
Alan
Stanier
Essex University
Computing Service
Microsoft Windows XP's "Remote Assistance" invitations trigger a false
positive for me.
Relevant headers:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: YOU HAVE RECEIVED A REMOTE ASSISTANCE INVITATION FROM: Nikki
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="=_NextPart_000_000
I would like to request a feature in the next development cycle, that feature being
support for multi-hosting in SQL prefs, ie [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] are
different users and need different prefs.
thanks
---
This SF.net email
there is a php interface for sql prefs
the devel directory has an older version
i have tried to contact the author to get the official dl site
dont know what it is
I have a copy of 0.6.2 which he emailed me at one time..
let me know if you want it... ill email it to you.
> -Original Mess
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 1:54 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] I hate SpamAssassin
> Why not let
> us have control of what happens at the PC level as opposed to the
> network level?
Probably because you'd co
>Because of you I am changing ISP's. There is no such thing as a
>whitelist that works. Even if I receive valid mail and you have
>targeted it as spam I cannot read it because you control freaks have
>altered the e-mail. Anyone else having similar problems? Why not let
>us have control of what happ
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 04:49:55PM -0500, Ben M. VanWagner wrote:
> > What amazes me is that everytime some idiot does this.. everyone agrees
> > that the information in the email needs to be changed and then it never
is.
>
> Here's an idea. What about changing th
Stop smoking Crack :-), I was being figurative. I don't literally mean that everyone
should send an apology email to every moron in this world. Obviously that would take
to long. A simple change once and for all to the SA report that places the blame on
the ISP and does not refer them to SA w
For those people wanting to implement side wide SA but allow elective removal in an
ISP situation you can make a very very simple change to your /etc/procmailrc
:0
* ! ? test -f $HOME/.sabypass
{
:0fw
* < 256000
| /usr/bin/spamc -f
}
then to bypass a user from SA just
touch /home/bubba/.saby
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am a newbie to spamassassin but managed to install
> it and am successfully running it right now. At my
> work place we have multiple servers on which we would
> like to install spamassassin to filter out SPAM. We do
> not have a centralised mail server where filtering is
>
> Jack,
>
> based on what you wrote, I added a "-m 2" option to my call of spamd, to
> limit the number of children to 2.
> This should solve at least my problem, since the default obviously was
> "unlimited". If that's wrong, could one of the devel
I'm running a Mandrake 9.0 machine, with qmail (as installed by LWQ.org) and
SA 2.55 site wide, using Bayes with auto learning enabled. The server is
just a gateway server, which then routes it's filtered email (Thank you VERY
much SpamAssassin!) to a POP server sitting behind it. The server behi
> I've been using Bayes and auto whitelisting for several weeks
> only, but on a site wide basis (i.e. spamc/spamd triggered from
> procmail from sendmail).
>
> I've been very happy with the bayes learner, but today got a
> pretty bad spam into one of the mailing lists I manage, here are
> some
> I need help figuring something out.
>
> I'm managing email on a server in an inhouse, company
> environment. Many users on system, but all are using the
> system for company business, so basically we will have very
> similar spam vs. ham issues.
>
> I was frustrated because the autolearn Bayes
I'm running a Mandrake 9.0 machine, with qmail (as installed by LWQ.org) and
SA 2.55 site wide, using Bayes with auto learning enabled. The server is
just a gateway server, which then routes it's filtered email (Thank you VERY
much SpamAssassin!) to a POP server sitting behind it. The server behi
> Hi,
> I am using the sam module in Horde/IMP CVS version for spamassasin
> to work with the webinterface.
>
> It works great
>
> I just wanted to ask , can I blacklist an entire domain for a particular
> user in his spam settings (Web iterface)
>
blacklist_f
>
> > This method proposes to delay EVERY SINGLE MESSAGE until a
> database match
> > is found for sending IP, FROM, and TO.
> >
> > So...we punish everyone in the world, and hope that a delay
> of one or more
> > hours is considered "acceptable"?
>
> I have to agree. I know for a fact tha
>
> In my work, we have a lot of mail servers. My idea is put a spamassassin
> server where any mail server in my domain can connect to the server to
> analize spams.
>
> It is posible??
>
> Bye!
Yes.
Chris
---
This SF.Net email is spon
I sent myself a
number of innocuous test messages, each containing just the
text
1 2 3 4 5 7
8
Ones from my hotmail
account were marked as SPAM. The full header set of one such is
below.
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version
2.0Received: from serlinux14.essex.ac.uk ([155.245.48
Perl
5.6.1, it varies a bit by platform and Perl version) every time I try to
get rid of the old Mail::SpamAssassin and create a new one.
Anybody have any suggestions?
-Dan
--
Daniel M. Zimmerman
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
