On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:53:09PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 08:42:30PM +0100, Olivier M. wrote: > > three *****SPAM***** in their Subject. Shouldn't SA check if > > there is already a "X-Spam-Flag" line in the headers, and > > skip the mail if it's the case ? :) > > How does SA know that it has done the scanning before? If a message gets > sent to me that was scanned with someone else's config, I want it rescanned > with my config. > > It would also allow spammers to DoS SA by adding a "X-Spam-Status: no" header > to all their spams.
not if a md5 hash or any ID field that identify a spamassassin copy would be added to the X-Spam-Flag field or anywhere... What do you think? Greetings, Olivier -- _________________________________________________________________ Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland qmail projects: http://omail.omnis.ch - http://webmail.omnis.ch _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
