On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 10:42:41AM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote: > As others have mentioned: It's hard to reliably be sure that a message > has((n't)?) been scanned before. My system might scan the message before > forwarding on to your system, for instance. > > What I'd recommend is -NOT- using the Subject-line *****SPAM**** tagging, > so that at least it isn't horribly modifying message content like that.
sure :) but ignoring mails containing a "X-Spam-Flag: YES" couldn't hurt, don't you think? But that was just an idea :) Regards, Olivier -- _________________________________________________________________ Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland qmail projects: http://omail.omnis.ch - http://webmail.omnis.ch _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
