Re: [SAtalk] Delete vs tagging spam

up to you. I dump spam into our user's Junk-Mail folder, which is then scanned once a week to update bayes and deleted. -- Jon Andrew Cranson said: > Would it be possible for an additional mysql preferance for a threshold to > be added to an upcoming spamassassin release for mail d

Re: [SAtalk] the list itself???

Yea same here. Emails have been dead since around the 23rd or so. I got your email through the list though, so maybe it's working now. -- Jon Tim B said: > did I get booted off the list, no list traffic or is sourceforge down? > I haven't gotten anything rea

Re: [SAtalk] the list itself???

Yea same here. Emails have been dead since around the 23rd or so. I got your email through the list though, so maybe it's working now. -- Jon Tim B said: > did I get booted off the list, no list traffic or is sourceforge down? > I haven't gotten anything rea

Re: [SAtalk] Filtering html messages

e > screen only see "spam". > Jennifer's POPCORN and BLACKHAIR rule sets will catch these. http://www.emtinc.net/spamhammers.htm - Jon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrator, tgpsolutions http://www.tgpsolutions.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [SAtalk] Network Tests - Activating and Status (Resend)

So your setup, the way you've described it, should be working just fine. To be sure, run spamassassin -D --lint and the output should tell you exactly what's going on. - Jon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrator, tgpsolutions http://www.tgpsolutions.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [SAtalk] W32.Novarg.A@mm virus

accurate rules for. See "9. The email will have the following characteristics:" http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Jon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrator, tgpsolutions http://www.tgpsolutions.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [SAtalk] general question about usage of SA

s a few headers to the message. The message's original subject and body are preserved, so even if I were to scan at queue-time, the users who don't want filtering would never know it's there. - Jon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrator, tgpsolutions http://www.tgpsolutions.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [SAtalk] Yahoo, etc

bulk folder, but it does happen, at least on my account. -- Jon Michael H. Collins said: > Sorta off topic, mebby, but: > > As good as SA is working here I have users that are constantly reminding > me that they get "absolutely no spam" on their yahoo, hotmail etc. >

[SAtalk] spamassassin -P works, spamd/spamc doesnt.

pretty much an "out of the box" fresh install. Is there any other thing in spamc to enable debugging? the Debug option on the daemon side really doesnt help. - - - Jon Myers ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lis

[SAtalk] incorporating SA in qmail-smtpd

since the system sends back an error, the sender knows that something is going on.. - - - Jon Myers The Circuit's Edge ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recogn

Re: [SAtalk] incorporating SA in qmail-smtpd

missing something here...? At the moment, we're actually using qmail-scanner, which we have setup to scan the messages with two virus scanners, and run it through spamassassin. At 10:23 AM 5/6/2002 +0800, you wrote: >Jon Myers wrote: >> This may be a big task, but has anyone

[SAtalk] New user question regarding razor.

right direction for this, and maybe supply me with an example of a razor.conf (and where is should live?) Sorry if these seem like daft questions, but we all need to start somewhere! Kind regards, Jon Paterson

RE: [SAtalk] New user question regarding razor.

boxes?) Regards, Jon -Original Message- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 May 2002 16:20 To: Jon Paterson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New user question regarding razor. On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:05:27PM +0100, Jon Paterson wrote: > Although

RE: [SAtalk] New user question regarding razor.

k out the code... Jon -Original Message- From: Vivek Khera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 May 2002 16:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] New user question regarding razor. >>>>> "JP" == Jon Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JP> I (per

[SAtalk] implementation

at SA must be run on the email server. -- Jon Fraley Unix Systems Administrator Glen Raven, Inc (336) 586-1148 --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are availabl

[SAtalk] SA stop working

auxw ) as /usr/local/bin/per―/usr/local/bin/spamassassin start. Is there supposed to be another instance running or better still where do I start looking for clues. Thanks Jon L. Miller, MCNE, CNS Director/Sr Systems Consultant MMT Networks Pty Ltd http://www.mmtnetworks.com.au "I don'

[SAtalk] permissions error

cannot create tmp lockfile /root/.spamassassin/bayes.lock.jfraleyx.glenraven.com.12514 for /root/.spamassassin/bayes.lock: Permission denied I have run spamd as root and as another user and still get the same results. Is there a fix for this? Thanks, -- Jon Fraley Unix Systems Administrator

RE: [SAtalk] No X-Spam-Report header line?!

ke one big playground." - Theo You have to edit the /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner.pl file and add it in there. It says: "my $spamc_subject='';". In between the single quotes in that line add something like ***SPAM*** or whatever you want. HTH, Jon

[SAtalk] configuration

on Red Hat 9.0 with no problems. That box is running sendmail-8.12.8-4. Any suggestions? -- Jon Fraley Unix Systems Administrator Glen Raven, Inc (336) 586-1148 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http

Re: [SAtalk] configuration

This is only to scan incoming local mail. Actually the server will set between a virus appliance and our email server. Jon On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 14:30, AltGrendel wrote: > On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 13:51, Jon Fraley wrote: > > I am trying to get Spamassassin 2.55, spamass-milter-

[SAtalk] adjusting required token hits for bayes

to set the minimum number of token hits required for bayes. Also is there a way to manually remove a bad token? Thanks, Jon. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkg

Re: [SAtalk] Changing Bayes scoring

The correct syntax for your local.cf file is: scoreBAYES_99 5.0 scoreBAYES_90 4.0 etc Cheers, Jon. On Friday 29 August 2003 11:42 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Greetings, > > I'd like to increase the score for certain bayes > confidence levels.

[SAtalk] hardware recomendations

I am planning on putting a Red Hat 9.0 box on our network to scan incoming email using sendmail, spamass-milter and spamassassin2.55. It will probably handle 3k to 5k messages daily. Does anyone have a recommendations on hardware. I have an old Pentium 166 that I thought about using. -- Jon

Re: [SAtalk] Changing Bayes scoring

Is there a way to change this behavior? It seems to me that a high bayes score also shows that it is spam and it might be possible to grab a few new tokens from the spam which you otherwise wouldn't get. Jon. On Friday 29 August 2003 12:22 pm, Tom Meunier wrote: > Somebody already answ

[SAtalk] spamd + bayes

i'm confused by something i read in the spamd documentation: If you plan to use Bayesian classification (the BAYES rules) with spamd, you will need to either 1. modify /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf to use a shared database of tokens, by setting the 'bayes_path' setting to a path all users ca

[SAtalk] Re: Learn

Francis wrote: I'm now using the default rules and receive some spam on my PC. I put those spam in a spam box on my PC. How can I use this box to to work with sa_lear on my Unix Server to find new rules? copy the box to your unix server and run sa-learn --mbox --spam /path/to/spam/mbox (assuming

[SAtalk] Re: Not sure if my Bayesian filter is adding to the score ...

Weyland wrote: Which is intresting because it spurred me to check mine. I'm using RH8 with Sendmail, supposedly using Bayes (I've been training it for a long time now, at least...), and didn't get *anything* when I cat and grep for "bayes". Nothing at all. So how *do* you know it's working? if y

Re: [SAtalk] RD - Here is a rule to check for Verisign redirect domain

The correct way to do this is not "nslookup sitefinder.verisign.com", but rather "nslookup www.safsdafdsfadsfsdafadsfdsaf.com" or some other garbage address. If you program spamassassin to do this, you can easily keep up with any ip changes that might happen. Jon. On Wednesd

Re: [SAtalk] RD - Here is a rule to check for Verisign redirect domain

Nope, it returns them all on my box. i.e. when i type "nslookup www.yahoo.com" i get about 20 ip addresses. So presumably, looking up a garbage address should also work even with round-robin. Jon. On Wednesday 17 September 2003 01:18 pm, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Jon Gabrielson <

Re: [SAtalk] RD - Here is a rule to check for Verisign redirect domain

The correct way to do this is not "nslookup sitefinder.verisign.com", but rather "nslookup www.safsdafdsfadsfsdafadsfdsaf.com" or some other garbage address. If you program spamassassin to do this, you can easily keep up with any ip changes that might happen. Jon. On We

Re: [SAtalk] RD - Here is a rule to check for Verisign redirect domain

The correct way to do this is not "nslookup sitefinder.verisign.com", but rather "nslookup www.safsdafdsfadsfsdafadsfdsaf.com" or some other garbage address. If you program spamassassin to do this, you can easily keep up with any ip changes that might happen. Jon. On Wednesd

Re: [SAtalk] Rule for MS Security Alert

name=".*.exe"|name=".*.com" /tmp/viruses Cheers, Jon. On Friday 19 September 2003 01:29 pm, Frank DeChellis wrote: > Hi > > I was just fiddling around and I entered a rule to catch some of the text > in the MS Security Alert patch but it never seems to go over

Re: [SAtalk] New virus posing as Microsoft

name=".*.exe"|name=".*.com" /tmp/viruses Cheers, Jon. On Friday 19 September 2003 09:54 am, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > This new virus appears to generate many (random?) subjects, so it's getting > difficult to narrow down. > > Has anyone filters for Spamas

Re: [SAtalk] New virus posing as Microsoft

name=".*.exe"|name=".*.com" /tmp/viruses Cheers, Jon. On Friday 19 September 2003 09:54 am, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > This new virus appears to generate many (random?) subjects, so it's getting > difficult to narrow down. > > Has anyone filters for Spamas

[SAtalk] reporting tools

I was wondering if there are any reporting tools out there for generating reports for spamassassin. I am using Spamassassin 2.55 with sendmail and spamass-milter. -- Jon Fraley Unix Systems Administrator Glen Raven, Inc (336) 586-1148

[SAtalk] sa-learning

that is actual ham, because sa-learn knows what to do with it. But, when a message was not flagged as spam, but is spam and a user forwards it to an account to for sa-learn to learn from, does sa-learn think that the user that forwarded the message is a spammer? How does this work? -- Jon

[SAtalk] bayes looking to wrong directory

amassassin/bayes_toks It should be looking in /home/stopspam/.spamassassin. Can anyone tell me how to rectify this? -- Jon Fraley Unix Systems Administrator Glen Raven, Inc (336) 586-1148 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to g

[SAtalk] AOL addresses

have required_hits 6. This seems to be the perfect level except for the aol accounts which seem to score in the 6 to 7 range on all messages. What is the best way to handle these? -- whitelist, change the score in local.cf? Thanks, Jon --- This SF.net

Re: [SAtalk] AOL addresses

On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 09:58, Keith C. Ivey wrote: > Jon Fraley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It seems that we do business with alot of people with aol.com > > email addresses. Practically all of these are getting flagged > > as SPAM with: > > > > 4

[SAtalk] RBL checks from behind firewall and virus appliance

not get any decent reporting about what is going on. Thanks, Jon --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services

Re: [SAtalk] RBL checks from behind firewall and virus appliance

On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 21:14, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 05:00 PM 10/13/03 -0400, Jon Fraley wrote: > >I currently have RBL checks turned off on our SA 2.6. We do our RBL > >checks at the firewall. Can SA do the RBL checks from within our > >network behind a virus appliance,

[SAtalk] Troubleshoot rbl checking

I am running SA 2.60. I had skip_rbl_checks set to 1 and now changed it to 0. I have started spamd with -D to get debugging, but do not see any thing about checking rbl's. Is there away to debug the rbl checks? Is there something I should look at? Thanks,

[SAtalk] SA and Mailscanner

the report if it is spam? Or does Mailscanner do this? I can not find exactly how it works. Mailscanner's documentation on their web site is sparse. Jon --- This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo The Eve

[SAtalk] socre in local.cf

x27;d as a big ISP, but had no rDNS 2.4 FAKE_HELO_AOL Host HELO did not match rDNS: aol.com What could be wrong? Thanks, Jon --- This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo The Event For Linux D

[SAtalk] vmailmgr and SA

I am using vmailmgr and I want to be able to mark spam for all users under vmailmgr, could I just put a procmail receipe in the /home/dom/domain/users directory or is this impossible. -- Jon Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This SF.net

[SAtalk] FQDN in email

Is there a way to tell spamassassin to send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you, -- Jon Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to mak

Re: [SAtalk] subject line not be rewritten

Did I not give enough information for this? Is there anything else I can add that would help to fix this? Anything else that is needed please let me know. I really need to get this working. Thanks for any help, Jon On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 19:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 2003-05-29 at

Re: [SAtalk] subject line not be rewritten

Did I not give enough information for this? Is there anything else I can add that would help to fix this? Anything else that is needed please let me know. I really need to get this working. Thanks for any help, Jon On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 19:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 2003-05-29 at

Re: [SAtalk] subject line not be rewritten-SOLVED-

On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 06:02, Mark Pearce wrote: > Hi > > > > > > Did I not give enough information for this? Is there anything else I > > > can add that would help to fix this? Anything else that is needed > > > please let me know. I really need to get this working. > > I had the same problem.

Re: [SAtalk] Ok... I missed something.....

On Sat, 2003-05-31 at 10:01, Kirk Moore wrote: > I just upgraded to 2.55 and now the *SPAM* is not longer showing > on the subject line. I see a small note, and somewhat have searched > through 4000+ messages. > > Here's the idiot question. did I miss something... I moved from 2.50 >

[SAtalk] Thanks for all the help

been enjoying spam for the past week and lovin every piece of it. :) Thanks!! -- Jon Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-1

[SAtalk] adding more checks?

Is there a way to add more checks on messages or does SA-2.55 come with all of them bundled. -- Jon Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.

Re: [SAtalk] adding more checks?

On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 11:10, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 08:22 PM 6/2/2003 -0800, Jon Reynolds wrote: > >Is there a way to add more checks on messages or does SA-2.55 come with > >all of them bundled. > > All of the standard rules are bundled in whatever the current release

[SAtalk] re: SA installation problem

any advice. -- Jon Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MMT Networks Pty Ltd --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win a

[SAtalk] re: Help in installation

.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/HTML/Parser.pm /root/.cpan/build/HTML-Parser-3.26/blib/lib/HTML/Parser.pm Am I to assume that I need perl 5.8.0? Any leads would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Jon L. Miller, MCNE, CNS Director/Sr Systems Consultant MMT Networks Pty Ltd http://www.mmtnetworks.com.au

[SAtalk] re: e-mail with attachment

Looks like someone on the list has been infected with the sobig virus. I just received an e-mail from this address on list [EMAIL PROTECTED] It has an attachment your_details.zip -- Jon Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MMT Networks P

[SAtalk] re: configuration

I'm using SA with Anomy Sanitizer and Postfix. I sent the test which showed up in my maillog as being sent, yet I chave not seen the message. Does anyone using this combination of products have it working? Thanks -- Jon Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MMT Netwo

[SAtalk] re: Can I put a subject that states this is Spam Mail

age did not contain plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor. -- Jon Miller &

Re: [SAtalk] re: Can I put a subject that states this is Spam Mail

." - > presumeably that would push the offensive stuff outside the > viewable area of most email programs. > > -Abigail -- Jon Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MMT Networks Pty Ltd --- This SF.Net emai

[SAtalk] re: SA and Outlook

from e-mails. If so is there a way to instruct SA not to touch the formatting in the e-mail if it's not spam. Thanks Jon L. Miller, MCNE, CNS Director/Sr Systems Consultant MMT Networks Pty Ltd http://www.mmtnetworks.com.au "I don't know the key to success, but the key to failur

[SAtalk] Spamassassin processing times 23sec plus

for for body tests. Does anyone have any suggestions? -- Jon Fraley Unix Systems Administrator Glen Raven, Inc (336) 586-1148 --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and

Re: [SAtalk] Message not SPAM; score is 5.1 :-/

flagging more spam than false positives. Jon. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Access Your PC Securely with GoToMyPC. Try Free Now https://www.gotomypc.com/s/OSND/DD ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list

[SAtalk] spamassassin and razor.

Does spamassassin give higher scores to items in the razor database with a higher confidence level? If not, is this something that is even possible? Jon. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site

[SAtalk] how to bounce mail above a threshhold?

received. I also realize that there needs to be some checks to make sure that the return address is valid and not just a fake spammer address. Has anyone tried something like this?, Jon. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek

[SAtalk] a false negative.

I have been getting a huge amount of false negatives since i upgraded spamassassin. Attached is one of the more obvious false negatives. Any suggestions about why this message got through spamassassin? It is loaded with tons of pornographic keywords, etc... Thanks, Jon. --- Begin Message

[SAtalk] false positive

happening? I can send the entire message on request. Thanks, Jon. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm00

[SAtalk] false negative and suggestion for new test.

imagine it ever being a valid reply address. opt-out maybe, but not opt-in False negative is attached, Jon Gabrielson >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 8 18:15:20 2002 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mtsbp519.opmnet.net (mtsbp519.op

[SAtalk] 2 more false negatives.

Attached are 2 more false negatives. Jon. p.s. is there a better place to report these? >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 11 22:20:37 2002 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zhuhai.mbfax.com (unknown [218.13.250.81]) by www.directfr

Re: [SAtalk] 2 more false negatives.

-spam/dcc/ Thanks, Jon. On Tuesday 12 November 2002 12:04, Paul Fries wrote: > Hmm. Those were both identified as spam by my scanner. However > falseng2.txt was caught only because of DCC and Razor. > > Here is the score details: > > Falsneg1.txt : > > X-Spam-Flag: YES >

[SAtalk] disabling nonlocal tests if score is already above the threshold

As far as I can tell, nonlocal tests only raise the score, never lower it. If this is the case, it might be nice to be able to skip nonlocal tests if the score is already above the threshold. Jon. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To

[SAtalk] installing DCC and pyzor breaks spamc but not spamassassin

last night spamc worked fine. Thanks, Jon. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html

[SAtalk] error message: sh: /tmp/sa.5249.BhnbyN: Permission denied

Procmail gives the following error message when spamassassin is run. What is this error, and how do I fix it? /tmp is already writable by all, so it shouldn't be having trouble writing to that location. Jon. sh: /tmp/sa.5036.BhnbyN: Permission denied sh: /tmp/sa.5036.BhnbyN: Permission d

[SAtalk] false negative

Here is a false negative i received today. I already reported it to razor. Is this the best place to report it for spamassassin? Jon. --- Begin Message --- Dear Sirs/Madam We found your company on www.directfreight.com's website and believe that our Hong Kong Fax Line service will assist

[SAtalk] SPAM_PHRASE_00_01

I have two questions: 1) How can you see what words are generating the spam phrase hits and how can you disable individual words? 2) shouldn't the below numbers be in order? ie. why does 00_01 score higher that 01_02 and why is 55_XX the second lowest? 50_scores.cf:score SPAM_P

[SAtalk] bouncing as an alternative to /dev/null

the filter, and also lamely try to unsubscribe from the lists. The url is at: http://www.directfreight.com/howtobouncespamwithprocmail.txt if anyone is interested. Jon. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven

Re: [SAtalk] bouncing as an alternative to /dev/null

On Sunday 24 November 2002 18:32, Dark Alchemist wrote: > Jon Gabrielson wrote: > > It seems to be a common question to ask how to > > /dev/null high scoring spam. This should probably > > be in the FAQs (as well as a few safer methods). > > Anyways, i thought t

Re: [SAtalk] bouncing as an alternative to /dev/null

your help, btw. Not a problem, you might direct any more questions about the script directly to me instead of to the listserve. Jon. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___

[SAtalk] Re: Spamassassin-talk digest, Vol 1 #794 - 38 msgs

in your razor config, and then just give RAZOR_CHECK a high score like 25. But again, 3 is not a high number and you WILL lose mail if you /dev/null razor > 3 Jon. On Monday 25 November 2002 08:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 15:00:11 -0600 > From:

Re: [SAtalk] bouncing as an alternative to /dev/null

I've heard this more than once, but the alternative to automatically bouncing mail is to change your email address every couple months which in effect starts automatically bouncing the mail anyways. I really don't see the difference. Jon. > Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 02:19:40 +0100 &

[SAtalk] FP and suggestion for new rule.

w positive points for something that was supposably already scanned be very effective? Or is this too easy to spoof? Jon. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compa

[SAtalk] blacklists of spamfriendly urls. (and suggestion for new test, if it doesn't exist)

y local.cf Thanks, Jon. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Visual Studio.NET comprehensive development tool, built to increase your productivity. Try a free online hosted session at: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?

Re: [SAtalk] blacklists of spamfriendly urls. (and suggestion for new test, if it doesn't exist)

s based on those IP blacklists would at least be a start. Jon. On Tuesday 03 December 2002 17:23, Rich Duzenbury wrote: > Seems like you could set up your own DNSBL using (perhaps) djbdns. I > _think_ you can configure SA to check any dnsbl you like. I'm out on a > limb here, tho

[SAtalk] Re: ideas for collaborative spam-filtering techniques?

and email addresses, you effectively limit them to saying stuff like 'you can find us by searching on google'. Of course to be effective it needs to pool from a large number of users and have trust ratings associated with each user similiar to the way razor does. Jon. -

[SAtalk] why sending to /dev/null is a really bad idea. (A 10+ FP)

ncing SPAM with a bypass passcode (which is what I currently do on scores > 9). Does anyone else have a good suggestion for this type of problem where a user is using a crap isp and you can't whitelist them beforehand(because you don't know who they are). Thanks, Jon. --- B

[SAtalk] Re: spamassassin at SMTP time (was: how do i turn off the automatic replies to spam)

This is exactly what I have been looking for. Does anyone know of any other MTAs that support these types of features? If not, I will probably be switching to exim. (i'm currently running postfix, but the SPAM features listed below would be worth the pain of switching) Thanks, Jon.

[SAtalk] Problem with make test

okay. *** Error code 11 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `test_dynamic' You have mail in /var/mail//join [join@ernie Mail-SpamAssassin-2.43]$ The platform is Sun Ultra 1, Solaris 8. Regards Jon Ingason Equant Sweden AB Solna strandväg 80 Phone: +46-8-5191 3316 Fax:

[SAtalk] whitelist seems to be ignored?

Hi spamassassin mailing list. I'm trying to avoid this email getting tagged as spam. at first i just tried to edit the user_prefs file, but after that didnt work i read http://useast.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECT

[SAtalk] RESOLVED - whitelist seems to be ignored?

Sorry for the trouble, but i managed to find the error :) JonB --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help

RE: [SAtalk] Clever spam (first of many, I'm afraid...)

which is a bit more justified than for a single user except where the satisfaction of blocking spam outweighs the amount of time doing it ... It's the age old closed vs open source arguement - just type "rant" or "holy war" into Google filtered according to taste for a

Re: [SAtalk] Habeas Responds to Spammer Violation of Habeas Warrant Mark

ment System offering > advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. > Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html > _______ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourcefor

Re: [SAtalk] Spamwriter

ng list > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. > Perforce is the Fast Software Configur