Weyland wrote:
Which is intresting because it spurred me to check mine.
I'm using RH8 with Sendmail, supposedly using Bayes (I've been training it for a long time now, at least...), and didn't get *anything* when I cat and grep for "bayes". Nothing at all.


So how *do* you know it's working?

if you have 200 ham and 200 spam learned in your bayes db, you will start seeing BAYES_xx in your X-Spam headers, eg:


X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,
HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED autolearn=ham version=2.60-rc3


or on a match, you'll see :

Content analysis details: (6.9 points, 5.0 required)

pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
5.4 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]


-jsd-




------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to