boot when
testing newly-implemented init scripts. That way, one can be certain
that not only will the software continue to run until the next reboot,
but it will also start up correctly next time the system boots. :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experien
imply
ignore most of the time, and only check once a day, week, month,
whatever time frame suits you. Just to make sure some mail wasn't lost
or miscategorized.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
s
me corroborating evidence
in the headers.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
sometimes known as David DeSimone || Experience comes from bad judgment."
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM
t; > q=
> > r=A
> > s==
> > t=3
> > u=n
> > v=N
> > w=?
> > x=
x=*
> > y=R
> > z=
> > 0=
> > 1=
> > 2=
> > 3=
> > 4=
> > 5=
> > 6=
> > 7=
> > 8=
> > 9
. It can be
handled by procmail.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
sometimes known as David DeSimone || Experience comes from bad judgment."
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:Think
s
are seeing the same or similar (or different) behavior.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
sometimes known as David DeSimone || Experience comes from bad judgment."
---
This SF.ne
tch this case, simply not call spam
assassin for internal-only mails (which sounds like what you want).
Speeds things up, too.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
sometimes known as David DeSimone || Experien
t you start one.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
sometimes known as David DeSimone || Experience comes from bad judgment."
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Develo
trange to me that you'd be in a hurry to get ahold of some. A few
weeks is all you need to get yourself a couple hundred spams. :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
sometimes known as David DeSimone
rs
ever examine bounces, or do any sort of management on their lists
whatsoever. It would simply add to their costs.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
sometimes known as David DeSimone || Experience comes from bad judgment."
---
t this from happening, though replies won't be received to such a
message. This has nothing to do with spamassassin, though...
> I'm here to say thanks to all those people out there that gave me very
> good helpnone what so ever...so thanks very much..
Please find enclosed,
ne.
What can be done to combat that? Of course, duplicate Message-ID's are
a violation of RFC's, but spammers don't care. :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
sometimes known as David DeSimone || Experience comes from bad j
ount. If it gets to my account, then my
> SWO> .procmailrc will end up putting it into my spam folder (which is
> SWO> what I want).
>
> SWO> Any takers?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
sometimes known as David DeSimone ||
e
have not been problems. Although I had stopped using my ISP years ago,
for some reason. But now I can send mail to my brother who uses
RoadRunner.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
sometimes known as
fw
* < 256000
* ! ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
| spamc
If the message is already tagged as spam, then there is no need to
process it again.
Spammers who pre-tag their messages as spam are doing us all a favor.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment com
:0fw
* < 256000
* ^Received: .*(my-external-gateway.fimble.com)
spamc
If you have multiple gateways through which mail can travel, simply
include them all:
:0fw
* < 256000
* ^Received: .*((gateway1|gateway2|gateway3).fimble.com)
spamc
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy
forge his way past this. And I do not have to
implement any whitelisting or blacklisting for my domain.
In order for you to implement this, you should examine Received headers
for your own site, and see if you can also determine a set of headers
that only appear on externally-origin
fferent read/write programming model, where you use
"select" to read and write both of your pipes in tandem (which is a lot
of programming work for probably little gain).
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment com
is
looking for "X-Spam-Status: Yes^M", and this fails to match, because the
next character after "Yes" is "," and not "^M".
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
somet
s
classifier may help weight spammy messages more, irrespective of who it
appears to be from.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
sometimes known as David DeSimone || Experience comes from bad judgment."
---
the AWL?
SA doesn't really know who the envelope sender was.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
sometimes known as David DeSimone || Experience comes from bad judgment."
---
This SF.N
] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
sometimes known as David DeSimone || Experience comes from bad judgment."
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Po
o you will still see the occasional spam
slip through. Folks are always working on new ideas for rules to detect
these things, but it is a case of continuous improvement. At the
moment, confronted with these types of spams, I'm not sure what SA could
do to try and detect them. But someone will
s directions
depending on the presence of text in the headers, either paying
attention or not to SA's decision on the mail.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
sometimes known as David
e" rules have been severely cut back in later
versions, so you won't need to do that yourself.
It's also possible that you are not using DNS tests. These tests can
improve SA's ability to detect spam.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes fr
Gary Funck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is this an intentional choice by the developers to enable Bayes auto
> learning by defualt?
My recollection is that it has always been that way.
What is the problem?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment c
pam?
This would become a separate score (positive or negative) in SA's normal
scoring process. And Bayesian word-tokens would be a different,
separate score as well.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
sometimes known as David DeSimone ||
match everything that ends in 'umd.edu' but does not
# begin with '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Any ideas on how I would say this?
:0
* ^From:.*umd\.edu
* !^From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$DEFAULT
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment c
ably want this:
my $timeString = sprintf("%02d%02d", $hour, $min);
This is some really great work, by the way. :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience.
sometimes known as David DeSimone || Experience comes from bad judgment."
--
29 matches
Mail list logo
