Larry Gilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Bayes token is a great possibility. The tokens in this case would > be time rather than words.
The only thing that worries me when I hear people say "Just let Bayes do it" is that it makes me think this is rolled into the singular Bayes score check that SA already does. It seems to me that this would be more effective as a separate, Bayes- trained database, which simply keeps track of spam scores received at various times of the day, and tries to determine, based on what time it is, what is the probability of spam? This would become a separate score (positive or negative) in SA's normal scoring process. And Bayesian word-tokens would be a different, separate score as well. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience. sometimes known as David DeSimone || Experience comes from bad judgment." ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
