Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Are you learning a proportionate amount of ham as well ? [...] > * Bayes doesn't "learn" particular messages, it learns the statistics > of the words used in the messages. [...]
None of this addresses the original posted concern: When you feed one or more messages to sa-learn, it should report: "Learned from X messages", where X is some number greater than zero. If sa-learn reports "Learned from 0 messages," it means that it didn't put anything into the Bayes database. The main reason that I have seen for this, is that SA thinks that it has already seen the message before, meaning that the Message-ID in the mail is already stored in the bayes database. However, the original poster already stated that he used "sa-learn --forget" to try to remove any traces of the message, and yet sa-learn STILL continues to say "Learned from 0 messages", meaning that it does not want to learn from the particular message. I had several spams not too long ago in which all of them used the same Message-ID. SA refused to learn from any of them except the first one. What can be done to combat that? Of course, duplicate Message-ID's are a violation of RFC's, but spammers don't care. :) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Good judgment comes from experience. sometimes known as David DeSimone || Experience comes from bad judgment." ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
