Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc4 released

On Thursday, September 11, 2003 @ 6:59:16 PM [-0700], Theo Van Dinter wrote: > http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc4.tar.gz Hi...just upgraded from rc3 to rc4 and am now seeing this in the logs... razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor Insecure dependency in connect wh

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 was hit-and-miss for me

On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 09:38:21PM -0700, Creede Lambard wrote: > http://www.spamassassin.org/released/ > > there's a set of 2.60 files there -- but now that I look at the page, the > dates on them are earlier than either rc3 or rc4. > > Don't know what's up with that, but as far as I can tell Ge

Re: [SAtalk] Ham and Spam script

On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 10:53:38AM +0100, James Gardiner wrote: > Has anyone written a script that run sa-learn through an IMAP folder? Here's a couple of cron jobs I use to do it: # Run user-supplied spams through SA's Bayesian learner 31 */2 * * * rootmv /var/mai

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc4 released

One more thing (this will be noted in the documentation in 2.60 or the next release candidate) ... if you use Razor2, you need to apply a small patch to avoid taint-mode problems. Here are the instructions. --- start of cut text -- This information is originally from http://www.ij

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 was hit-and-miss for me

Hi, On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:52:39 -0700 Creede Lambard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, new to the list, so apologies if this has already been covered. > > I upgraded my version of SpamAssassin from 2.55 to 2.6 this morning, turned > it on, and started watching the mail log when obvious sp

[SAtalk] Elusive AWL filename

Hi, I just upgraded to 2.60rc4 from 2.60rc2. I changed nothing in my local.cf, and in fact, the AWL path is not specified there (I just use the default) I've noticed though, that the filename is written as "auto-whitelist.db" in this version; in rc2, it was written as "auto-whitelist". So I ren

[SAtalk] 2.60rc4: always_add_headers now defaults to 0?

Upgraded from rc2, and now the X-Spam-Level and X-Spam-Status headers do not get added unless I set this variable to 1. In all previous versions I've used, the reverse was true. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek he

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 was hit-and-miss for me

Creede Lambard wrote: Hello all, new to the list, so apologies if this has already been covered. I upgraded my version of SpamAssassin from 2.55 to 2.6 this morning, turned it on, and started watching the mail log when obvious spams started appearing in my mailbox. At first I thought it was onl

Re: [SAtalk] Header problem, intermittent, SpamAssassin 2.60 rc3

I understand. In this case, my suggestion - to never lower the X-Spam-Status score if it already exists (and is higher than the newly calculated score) - is even more relevant. This would prevent mail score being lowered after going through more than one SA. - Original Message - From: "A

Re: [SAtalk] No BAYES_* ?

On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 03:10:53PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote: > I don't know but I have the same problem. It seems to > happen when my bayes_toks file reaches about 5k. > So far, I've lost the bayes database 3 times. If I monitor Thanks for the warning, I'll start to make a backup copy insid

[SAtalk] whitelist entire domain

Hi guys! I'm new to SA but I'm have my system wide configuration up & running. Now, I'm trying to whitelist an entire domain... which is the best way to do it? I'm trying this line in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf: whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain.com but it is n

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60rc4: always_add_headers now defaults to 0?

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:46:57AM +, Jim wrote: > Upgraded from rc2, and now the X-Spam-Level and X-Spam-Status headers do > not get added unless I set this variable to 1. > > In all previous versions I've used, the reverse was true. always_add_headers doesn't affect X-Spam-Level and X-Spam-

Re: [SAtalk] Editing scores

Excellent catch. Thank you. I still think that score is a little high for a subject having spaces. Can I configure that test in local.cf to be lower? Any other way without changing 50_scores? >>> Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 9/11/2003 2:19:22 PM >>> At 01:07 PM 9/11/2003 -0400, Alicia Fors

[SAtalk] spell check email subject?

I think you are the right people to ask. Sorry if this is a mass-mailing. I receive a lot of spam email with what seem to be random character subjects. Is there a way to spell check the subject in .procmail so that if the density of non-words is high mark the message as spam? Thank you. __

Re: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM still in SpamAssassin version 2.60-rc3??

At 08:40 AM 9/11/2003 -0600, Ken Gordon wrote: I just noticed the following in a spamassassin report. I thought 2.60 (which I think I am running) didn't use this test. Am I wrong? Should I be zeroing it in local.cf? RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM (0.9 points) RBL: Received via a relay in relays.osirus

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd

At 12:28 PM 9/9/2003 -0600, Alan Fullmer wrote: Am I doing something wrong? This is the statement I have in my list: whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] xnote.com but it isn't working. do i have the syntax right? where [EMAIL PROTECTED] is

[SAtalk] Autolearn

Hello List: My setup is as follows: /---\/\/--\/-\ | Virus Scanner | -> | qmail + SA | -> | Exchange | -> | Outlook | \---/\/\--/\-/ Although there are some clients using POP3/IMAP, most of th

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 was hit-and-miss for me

Oh good, maybe I'm not alone in this. :) I didn't check the sizes on the mails that slipped through, although some of them were just knockoffs I sent myself with a short body like "foo bar baz". Bob Apthorpe suggested that mails over a large limit (100K maybe) get dropped. That's not the problem

[SAtalk] Russian Translation

Hi, We translate messages, test descriptions, and templates for SpamAssassin 2.55 into russian language. We will very happy if you include attached file in next release of SpamAssassin. Thank you. for_SA.txt.bz2 Description: BZip2 compressed data

Re: [SAtalk] spamd vs spamassassin from .forward files

On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 04:03:02PM -0700, John Schneider wrote: > This seems to work OK, but I'm not sure it is an efficient setup. It is not. Provided that you have a scenario with non-linear delivery and/or multiple users, there is practically no use at all in calling spamassassin when you cou

[SAtalk] Custom RBL

Is there any way to make SA check other RBL's? Ever since the demise of Osirusoft, I've been using my own RBL zone file on my DNS server, but I'd like to have SA check it as well. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek

RE: [SAtalk] spell check email subject?

check the wiki at www.exit0.us fred rules have been working great. Much better then mine. Actually I use them both ;) > -Original Message- > From: Roger Kh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:53 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] spell check email

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60rc4: always_add_headers now defaults to 0?

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:00:35AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:46:57AM +, Jim wrote: > > Upgraded from rc2, and now the X-Spam-Level and X-Spam-Status headers do > > not get added unless I set this variable to 1. > > > > In all previous versions I've used, the re

Re: [SAtalk] What the F****??

On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:38:47PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: > Hrm. I'm wondering what that's gonna do to the Bayes_* scores for those > tokens? if it's only 1 message, not a lot. I always learn on error though. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "You can't run sausage backwards through a meat

Re: [SAtalk] Rule for no reverse DNS

Covington, Chris wrote: I've noticed that Columbia University has an SA rule for no reverse DNS: Have you used this technique before? For me, it was an incessant pain in the ass. You will be bombarded with complaints. The very reason that I'm using SA is that host-based blocking, with the except

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 was hit-and-miss for me

On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Creede Lambard spaketh thusly: -}Oh good, maybe I'm not alone in this. :) Oh no you are not. ;> I am currently chasing the same problem. We are running SA 2.55 site-wide and are seeing tons of these. Most go though fine however some do not. I can watch in the logs as th

[SAtalk] Clearing the database - messed up autolearn

Greetings! After not throroughly reading the documentation, I trained the Bayes database incorrectly, and the autolearn function also learned a LOT of incorrect spam/ham classifications (resulting in "penis enlargements" coming through as ham, Bugtraq getting marked as spam, etc). I am starting o

Re: [SAtalk] Custom RBL

See this page: http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs Frederic Tarasevicius Internet Information Services, Inc. Frank Pineau wrote: > Is there any way to make SA check other RBL's? Ever since the demise > of Osirusoft, I've been using my own RBL zone file on my DNS server, > but I'd like to

[SAtalk] Trying to install DB_File from CPAN

I'm trying to install DB_File from CPAN so I can use Bayes, but the install fails.  I get these error messages:   version.c:30:16: db.h: No such file or directorymake: *** [version.o] Error 1  /usr/bin/make  -- NOT OKRunning make test  Can't test without successful makeRunning make install 

[SAtalk] Re: [SA-Announce] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc4 released

I am upgrading from rc3 to rc4 and I'm using the same spec file that I used to compile rc3 to compile rc4. I updated it to point to the new package, so it unzips correctly. Have any of these variables changes(they must have...)? from rc3 to rc4? INST_PREFIX INST_SITELIB INST_SYSCONFDIR DEF

Re: [SAtalk] Custom RBL

Sweet. Exactly what I needed. Thanks. On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Fred I-IS.COM wrote: > See this page: > http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs > --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _

Re: [SAtalk] Trying to install DB_File from CPAN

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 12:44:10PM -0500, AWShirley wrote: > I'm trying to install DB_File from CPAN so I can use Bayes, but the install fails. > I get these error messages: > Can anyone tell me what I'm missing on my system? I'm running Mandrake 9.1 Do you have the db* RPMs installed? ala db3

[SAtalk] One that slipped through 2.60 rc4

Hi, Here's a copy of one I just got with no mark up doing cat file | spamc -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't add any markup either. A spamassassin -t does mark it up though. Regards, Rick --- Begin Message --- fdifjhbbzv ltd xehvqs s lwrqtgrwyf ynjl eaq ey dsvhv djbqou nzwur jholq j cjg

Re: [SAtalk] Rule for no reverse DNS

Larry Gilson wrote: > I think that you will want to lower the score to maybe 1.0. There are > a lot of legitimate mail servers that do not have a reverse lookup. Like my own personal server at work. :/ For whatever reason, reverse lookups on the IP block it's on don't resolve from outside. I t

Re: [SAtalk] Re: [SA-Announce] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc4 released

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 12:07:35PM -0600, Lucas Albers wrote: > I am upgrading from rc3 to rc4 and I'm using the same spec file that I > used to compile rc3 to compile rc4. I updated it to point to the new > package, so it unzips correctly. You can't do that. Need to update the spec file. > Have

[SAtalk] Opendaemonsocket problem

Hello, Sep 12 18:29:35 ns1 sendmail[14913]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): opendaemonsocket: daemon MTA: cannot bind: Address already in use Sep 12 18:29:35 ns1 sendmail[14913]: daemon MTA: problem creating SMTP socket Sep 12 18:29:35 ns1 sendmail[14913]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): opendaemonsocket: daem

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc4 released

> "MT" == Matt Thoene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MT> Hi...just upgraded from rc3 to rc4 and am now seeing this in the logs... MT> razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor Insecure dependency in MT> connect while running setuid at MT> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/IO/Socket.pm lin

Re: [SAtalk] One that slipped through 2.60 rc4

2.60rc4 scored it 6.0 for me On Friday, September 12, 2003, at 11:17 AM, Rick Macdougall wrote: pts rule name description -- -- 0.8 TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL To: repeats address as real name 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE

Re: [SAtalk] Opendaemonsocket problem

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 06:36:27PM +0100, TUNC ERESEN wrote: > Sep 12 18:29:35 ns1 sendmail[14913]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): opendaemonsocket: > daemon MTA: cannot bind: Address already in use > Sep 12 18:29:35 ns1 sendmail[14913]: daemon MTA: problem creating SMTP socket > Sep 12 18:29:35 ns1 sendma

Re: [SAtalk] Trying to install DB_File from CPAN

On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, AWShirley wrote: > I'm trying to install DB_File from CPAN so I can use Bayes, but the > install fails. I get these error messages: > version.c:30:16: db.h: No such file or directory You need Berkley DB -- http://www.sleepycat.com/download/index.shtml if you like to build f

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 was hit-and-miss for me

So may be something like this hit us too... On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 02:57:14PM -0400, Scott Lambert wrote: > If spamc can't connect to spamd, (all slots full on the spamd server), > it just passes the message through. If spamd dies while running under > something like DJB's daemontools, one to se

[SAtalk] Has anyone written rules for Sobig:F

that I can just add? TIA -- -Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have - -happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ -Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- -individuals! What if this weren't a hy

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 was hit-and-miss for me

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 07:30:42AM -0700, Creede Lambard wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 06:08:42AM -0400, Rick Macdougall wrote: > > > > BSDi 4.3 handling the spamd, being called from a Slackware 8.1 box with > > spamc and I see the same thing in 2.60-rc3. Not often mind you, I get > > about

Re: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM still in SpamAssassin version 2.60-rc3??

On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:34:12AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: > RC3 had them removed to the best of my knowledge. You're right. I can never keep track of what changes between releases. ;) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "You can start by removing your clothes. Not without flowers and dinner.

Re: [SAtalk] Trying to install DB_File from CPAN

Thanks for the help! That's exactly what I needed to do. - Original Message - From: "Gary Lopez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "AWShirley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 1:49 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Trying to install DB_File from CPAN > It is lookong for /usr/local/Ber

RE: [SAtalk] spamd vs spamassassin from .forward files

> -Original Message- > From: John Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 7:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] spamd vs spamassassin from .forward files > > > Please forgive me if this is already answered in the list > archives. But, if >

Re: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM still in SpamAssassin version 2.60-rc3??

--On Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:29:08 -0400 Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 08:40:54AM -0600, Ken Gordon wrote: I just noticed the following in a spamassassin report. I thought 2.60 (which I think I am running) didn't use this test. Am I wrong? Should I b

Re: [SAtalk] spamd failing

At 10:33 11/09/2003, Richard I. Kirkcaldy wrote: Hi, I'm using exiscan with spamd, and recently it's stopped working. I've been trying to get dcc working with spamassassin, but gave up - so I'm assuming that's what has caused it. Nope that's not it. I'm running Exim 4.22 and SpamAssassin

[SAtalk] Running Mailman 2.1.2 with Spamassassin 2.55 and Mimedefang. 2.36

I think the odds are against it being either of these 2 programs, but I'm losing what's left of my mind Mailman won't send any mail No error messages, logs look ok, and it doesn't LOOK like mimedefang or spamassassin has anything to do with the problem... but I figured I'd ask. Any wei

Re: [SAtalk] Rule for no reverse DNS

Just FYI, AOL is doing reverse DNS and won't accept incoming email if they don't approve of the sending IP address.. as in, they won't accept messages from my domain because I use dyndns and not a static IP. I wonder how long that stupid idea will last? Mike- Mornings: Evolution in action. O

Re: [SAtalk] Clearing the database - messed up autolearn

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 12:34:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > other than the expiration. Is "sa-learn --rebuild --force-expire" the option > I'm looking for to clean it entirely? Delete the db files. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Given enough time and money, Microsoft will eventually 'i

Re: [SAtalk] Rule for no reverse DNS

At 9/12/03 08:26 AM , Scott Rothgaber wrote: Covington, Chris wrote: I've noticed that Columbia University has an SA rule for no reverse DNS: Have you used this technique before? For me, it was an incessant pain in the ass. You will be bombarded with complaints. The very reason that I'm using SA

RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc4 released

Hello, Has something PATH wise changed on rc4? I installed rc4 and suddenly SA cannot find "dccproc" and "pyzor" which are installed in my mail/spam/virus bin directory. Creating link(s) in /usr/local/bin to dccproc & pyzor fixed the problem and SA can then find the programs, but I do not un

Re: [SAtalk] spamd performance

Sorry for jumping in. If performance is an issue, how about an option like... HIT_AND_RUN 1 ...that would cause spamd to stop processing once your threshhold had been met? IOW why keep scanning text once the message has been identified as spam? I'm sure that I'm missing something here but I'd

[SAtalk] 4 different scores

what do the 4 different scores mean? and how does one use them? HTML_MESSAGE 0.160 0.001 0.100 0.100 score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 0 2.25 0 1.50 Scott Kopel English Department, FSU Mail Code 1580 850 644 6177 --- This sf.net email is sponso

RE: [SAtalk] Clearing the database - messed up autolearn

Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 12:34:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > other than the expiration. Is "sa-learn --rebuild > --force-expire" the option > > I'm looking for to clean it entirely? > > Delete the db files. I installed amavisd-new an

Re: [SAtalk] spamd performance

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 11:32:16AM -0400, Scott Rothgaber is rumored to have said: > > If performance is an issue, how about an option like... > > HIT_AND_RUN 1 > > ...that would cause spamd to stop processing once your threshhold had > been met? IOW why keep scanning text once the message has

Re: [SAtalk] Russian Translation

Can you create a bug for this and add it to SpamAssassin Bugzilla at bugzilla.spamassassin.org? After you create the bug, please attach the translations using the "create an attachment" link. (Do not cut and paste.) Thanks. Daniel --- This s

Re: [SAtalk] Has anyone written rules for Sobig:F

On Friday, Sep 12th 2003 at 15:49 -0500, quoth Larry Rosenman: =>--On Friday, September 12, 2003 09:11:10 -0400 "Steven W. Orr" =><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: => =>> that I can just add? =>> =>> TIA => =>add a virus scanner. => =>LER Ok. Let be be more clearerer. What I'm looking for is a set of

Re: [SAtalk] Clearing the database - messed up autolearn

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 04:38:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I installed amavisd-new and spamassassin from FreeBSD ports. > Are these the files I'm looking for: > > /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes_msgcount > /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes_seen > /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes_toks

[SAtalk] Wolfgang Fuertbauer: Ich bin außer Haus! / I'm out of the office

Ich werde ab 12.09.2003 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 13.09.2003. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht(en) nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. mfg I will answer after returning to the office. Regards Wolfgang Fuertbauer --- This sf.net email i

[SAtalk] (no subject)

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Nougen Canada Inc. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_QM90VpaqliA7JXtz7mI5dw)" X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030901 Thun

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60rc4: always_add_headers now defaults to 0?

Jim wrote: >>> Upgraded from rc2, and now the X-Spam-Level and X-Spam-Status headers do >>> not get added unless I set this variable to 1. >>> >>> In all previous versions I've used, the reverse was true. Theo Van Dinter wrote: >> always_add_headers doesn't affect X-Spam-Level and X-Spam-Status

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc4 released

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 11:49:59AM -0500, Henrik Schmiediche wrote: > Has something PATH wise changed on rc4? I installed rc4 and suddenly SA > cannot find "dccproc" and "pyzor" which are installed in my > mail/spam/virus bin directory. Creating link(s) in /usr/local/bin to > dccproc & pyzor fixed

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60rc4: always_add_headers now defaults to 0?

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 10:00:02AM -0700, Dan Quinlan wrote: > >> always_add_headers doesn't affect X-Spam-Level and X-Spam-Status. > >> They're both added by default to all messages, unless your configuration > >> disables them. doh. sorry about that. I was confusing always_add_headers with alw

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 was hit-and-miss for me

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 02:57:14PM -0400, Scott Lambert wrote: > Spamd running with -m parameter? Um, I have no idea. I can check. > > If spamc can't connect to spamd, (all slots full on the spamd server), > it just passes the message through. If spamd dies while running under > something like D

Re: [SAtalk] Has anyone written rules for Sobig:F

--On Friday, September 12, 2003 09:11:10 -0400 "Steven W. Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: that I can just add? TIA add a virus scanner. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboa

Re: [SAtalk] Has anyone written rules for Sobig:F

Spamassassin is a spam blocker not a virus checker. You want a virus checker such as antivir, see http/www.antivir.de. This is free for personal use. Nigel On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:11:10 -0400 (EDT) "Steven W. Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > that I can just add? > > TIA > > -- > -Time flies

RE: [SAtalk] Has anyone written rules for Sobig:F

Steve, Something like this: header _VBOUNCE_h_sobigf Subject =~ /(?:Re\: Details|Re\: Approved|Re\: Re\: My details|Re\: Thank you\!|Re\: That movie|Re\: Wicked screensaver|Re\: Your application|Thank you\!|Your details)/ body _VBOUNCE_b_sobigf /(?:See the attached file for details|Please see the

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60rc4: always_add_headers now defaults to 0?

Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > doh. sorry about that. I was confusing always_add_headers with > always_add_report. :( I had to re-read the options about 3 times for each version myself. :-) The old options are rather confusing. The new methods are much better and easier to gro

Re: [SAtalk] Has anyone written rules for Sobig:F

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 05:09:02PM -0400, Steven W. Orr is rumored to have said: > > What I'm looking for is a set of recipes for rejecting the Sobig:F virus > based on the text that appears in the Subject line. Filenames would be better. I wrote a rule a couple of weeks ago for the filenames fo

Re: [SAtalk] Custom RBL

Fred wrote: >> See this page: >> http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs Frank Pineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sweet. Exactly what I needed. Thanks. You can also read Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf (look for the string "check_rbl") and read the examples in the 20_dnsbl_tests.cf file that ship

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 was hit-and-miss for me

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:39:18PM +0200, Chr. von Stuckrad wrote: > So may be something like this hit us too... > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 02:57:14PM -0400, Scott Lambert wrote: > > If spamc can't connect to spamd, (all slots full on the spamd server), > > it just passes the message through. If

Re: [SAtalk] Has anyone written rules for Sobig:F

Steven W. Orr wrote on Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:11:10 -0400 (EDT): > that I can just add? > Lots at www.exit0.us ! Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org

[SAtalk] Re: spamd performance

This might be an issue of scale. I'm probibly 800 messages every few minutes. A couple of thouasnd e-mail acconts forwarded via spamc. Is the script you ran available for download? Jim writes: On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 09:42:02PM -0400, Paul Farber wrote: New machine... dual 1.2Ghz AMD CP

[SAtalk] sa-learn produces errors

Hi, this is the 3rd time I try to get help. I'm running successfully SpamAssassin (spamd) on a freeBSD VPS. However when I try to train SpamAssassin with sa-learn I get the following error:Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CmdLearn.pm in @INC I should also mention I had to patch spamd with the fol

Re: [SAtalk] Re: [SA-Announce] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc4 released

--On Friday, September 12, 2003 12:07 PM -0600 Lucas Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Could someone post an updated redhat spec file for rc4? ln -s Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc4.tar.gz Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60.tar.gz rpmbuild -ta Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60.tar.gz (The spec file in the tarball isn't expe

RE: [SAtalk] spamd performance

I've suggested this myself; run all of the negative score tests first, then the positive ones, and stop when you hit threshold. I'm told there are architectural reasons why this can't currently be done. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve T

Re: [SAtalk] Has anyone written rules for Sobig:F

On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:09:02 -0400 (EDT) "Steven W. Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok. Let be be more clearerer. > > What I'm looking for is a set of recipes for rejecting the Sobig:F > virus based on the text that appears in the Subject line. Are you quite happy to accept all other viruses

[SAtalk] Runaway spamd

I installed 2.60 rc4 over 2.55 which had not been used. This is the result: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ Command 26711 omega13 15 0 27324 23m 13m R 30.3 13.2 1:22.34 spamd 26559 omega13 18 0 26624 17m 7972 R 30.0 9.6 9:23.79 spamd The only changes

[SAtalk] spamd running as "nobody"

I have several aliases on my machine that are not users on the machine, and so when procmail calls spamd it's user nobody. Maybe I should not have done this, but I created /.spamassassin owned by nobody, so spamd could write bayes tokens and user_prefs to be shared by those aliases. I'm getting t

Re: [SAtalk] Runaway spamd fount the problem

On Friday 12 September 2003 04:02 pm, Robin Lynn Frank wrote: > I installed 2.60 rc4 over 2.55 which had not been used. This is the > result: > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ Command > 26711 omega13 15 0 27324 23m 13m R 30.3 13.2 1:22.34 spamd > 26559 omega

Re: [SAtalk] Clearing the database - messed up autolearn

abmc> I am starting over, and need to "clear" or "untrain" the database of abmc> whatever incorrect info it has in it, but the sa-learn man page doesn't seem abmc> to have a specific option for clearing all information and starting over, abmc> other than the expiration. Is "sa-learn --rebuild --for

[SAtalk] Autowhitelist giving ME bad score

I'm filtering email addressed to alias users and mailman lists on my machine, and today I'm finding that my own email to these lists is getting a huge score from the auto-whitelist. I've had to do: spamassassin [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm not sure I understand what's going on here. Spamassassin 2.60-

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamd performance

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 05:38:17PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This might be an issue of scale. Might be. How many simultaneous spamc processes do you usually have at any given time? > I'm probibly 800 messages every few minutes. Do you also use any RBLs to reject anything at the SMTP s

Re: [SAtalk] Has anyone written rules for Sobig:F

Hello Steven, Friday, September 12, 2003, 6:11:10 AM, you wrote: SWO> that I can just add? 1. Spamassassin did a good job of stopping Sobig.F without any extra rules, as it apparently ran afoul of other recipes. 2. SobigF expired on September 10th. There may be a few errant worms floating aroun

Re: [SAtalk] Re: SA Won't Update from rc2 to rc4

Quoting "Malte S. Stretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Saturday 06 September 2003 03:26 CET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# spamassassin --version > > SpamAssassin version 2.60-rc3-mss2 > > > > Perl version: > > 5.006001 > >[...] > > That is odd, because: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[SAtalk] 2.60rc4 - sa-learn errors

Hi there. I thought I'd give RC4 a try just to make sure things are going to work for me. Everything seems to be working properly, with the exception of learning with sa-learn. Dumping the database/magic, etc. works fine, but calling "sa-learn --spam" results in the following error: > Insecu

[SAtalk] Re: SpamAssassin 2.60 rc4 released

On Friday 12 September 2003 07:38 CET Matt Thoene wrote: > Hi...just upgraded from rc3 to rc4 and am now seeing this in the logs... > > razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor Insecure dependency in > connect while running setuid at > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/IO/Socket.pm line 108,

[SAtalk] Wolfgang Fuertbauer: Ich bin außer Haus! / I'm out of the office

Ich werde ab 12.09.2003 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 13.09.2003. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht(en) nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. mfg I will answer after returning to the office. Regards Wolfgang Fuertbauer --- This sf.net email i

Re: [SAtalk] No BAYES_* ?

On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Carlo Wood wrote: > Ok, I re-learned most of it :/ > Does anyone have an idea why it can happen that > this database loses its content? > > When running the same mail again with debugging > turned on, I see the following: > > debug: bayes token 'HX-Qmail-Scanner-1.16:header'

[SAtalk] Bug: Can't have 2 SpamAssassin objects in 1 program

For implementing a major new feature of MailScanner, I need to have 2 SpamAssassin objects which have completely different directories for rules, user_prefs, etc. 1 is going to do spam checking (as now), the other is going to have content checking rules added as an entirely custom set of *.cf f

Re: [SAtalk] Editing scores

I attach a perl file that may help you identify where scores come from. Isolate the offending email (with SA markup) and run the email message into the perl program: perl perltest It will print the tests, scores and total score. It will attempt to look in /usr/share/spamassassin and /etc/mail/spam

RE: [SAtalk] What the F****??

Going forward, would it be possible to have a configuration option that allows you to take Bayes scores into account when autolearning? -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 12:49 AM To: Larry Rosenman; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: [SAtalk] Editing scores

At 01:07 PM 9/11/2003 -0400, Alicia Forsythe wrote: I just cought an FP where the SUBJ_HAS_SPACES rule gave 3.5 points. My local.cf has no reference to this rule, but I did find it in 50_scores.cf: SUBJ_HAS_SPACES 2.425 2.026 1.101 2.329 I think you're looking in the wrong place. That message was

RE: [SAtalk] Rule for no reverse DNS

Well, just to add one more post to this thread. I contacted Joe Brennan at Columbia. He let me know how he performs this check and said it would be ok to share with the list. Please don't ask me questions about this as he uses Mimedefang and Sendmail, both of which I do not use. Cudos to Joe fo

[SAtalk] 2.60 RC4 deletes local.cf

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Be careful! I just upgraded to 2.60rc4 and my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf got blown away. Not sure if this is just me or not. - -- Mike Loiterman grantADLER Tel: 630-302-4944 Fax: 773-868-0071 Email: [EMAIL PROTECT

[SAtalk] SA rc2-4 skipping certain messages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > I'm getting a growing number of messages that appear to have been > skipped by SA. > > I've mailed the list about this several times, but have yet to > receive answer. One other person noticed this, but he never > responded to my inquiry either >

[SAtalk] Sa-learn error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm getting this error when I do an sa-learn --spam Insecure dependency in glob while running with -T switch at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/ArchiveIterator .pm line 621. - -- Mike Loiterman gra

RE: [SAtalk] Rule frequencies

Some FAQs: 1. No parameters are needed. The $1 and $2 variables are field variables for awk. 2. This script is more of a "typing saver" rather than a piece of code. Hence, 3. The path to your spam-or-ham file is hardcoded. I have one script for ham and one for spam. Also, 4. I am too lazy

  1   2   >