> -Original Message-
> From: AltGrendel
> On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 17:32, Bonny wrote:
> > In data 29 Jul 2003 15:31:04 -0400
> > AltGrendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva:
> >
> > > Yes, but you will probably have to use the nodeps option.
> >
> > Why this? I mean, when UNinstalling, what
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 17:32, Bonny wrote:
> In data 29 Jul 2003 15:31:04 -0400
> AltGrendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva:
>
> > Yes, but you will probably have to use the nodeps option.
>
> Why this? I mean, when UNinstalling, what is nodeps good for?
Ok, maybe I spoke out of turn here. But as I
In data 29 Jul 2003 15:31:04 -0400
AltGrendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva:
> Yes, but you will probably have to use the nodeps option.
Why this? I mean, when UNinstalling, what is nodeps good for?
--
Bonny - Registered Linux User #251752
--- VB LUG Moderator ---
All E-mail gladly receiv
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 13:45, Bonny wrote:
> In data Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:01:53 -0700
> Jason Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva:
>
> > install Mail::SpamAssassin
> >
> > Spell it correctly, it is caps sensitive.
>
> OK, just wanting to know the last thing:
>
> can I remove all the RPMs relate
In data Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:01:53 -0700
Jason Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva:
> install Mail::SpamAssassin
>
> Spell it correctly, it is caps sensitive.
OK, just wanting to know the last thing:
can I remove all the RPMs related to SA or not, when installing from
CPAN?
Thanks
--
Bonny
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:14:36 -0400, you wrote:
>Sorry if it sounded like I was replying just to you. I was following the
>thread and suggesting a different route and supplying an answer rather than
>just do something else.
>
>Great, but the advisement was to go the CPAN route. I would counter t
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:49:55 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Michael W. Cocke
>
>> There's also some kind of dependency error in the redhat RPM/
>> SpamAssassin chain. I never did get the most recent RPM to install,
>> it keeps complaining about a dependency problem -
To install spamassassin via CPAN...
perl -MCPAN -e shell
(If you have not set it up before, It will have a configuration that you
need to go through. Read through it and adjust it accordingly.)
Once that is done and you are at the cpan prompt:
install Mail::SpamAssassin
Spell it correctly, it
In data Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:53:50 -0400
"Michael W. Cocke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva:
> There's also some kind of dependency error in the redhat RPM/
> SpamAssassin chain. I never did get the most recent RPM to install,
> it keeps complaining about a dependency problem - and asking me to
> ins
On 28 Jul 2003 09:05:58 -0400, you wrote:
>On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 07:14, Bonny wrote:
>> In data Fri, 25 Jul 2003 20:27:44 -0400
>> Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva:
>>
>>
>> > If you want to know in-depth, check out the changelog:
>> >
>> > http://www.spamassassin.org/dist/Changes
>> >
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 07:14, Bonny wrote:
> In data Fri, 25 Jul 2003 20:27:44 -0400
> Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva:
>
>
> > If you want to know in-depth, check out the changelog:
> >
> > http://www.spamassassin.org/dist/Changes
> >
> > 2.44 was released 2003-01-31 and 2.55 was rele
In data Fri, 25 Jul 2003 20:27:44 -0400
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva:
> If you want to know in-depth, check out the changelog:
>
> http://www.spamassassin.org/dist/Changes
>
> 2.44 was released 2003-01-31 and 2.55 was released 2003-05-19.
OK, I'll check it. Now, as I got SpamAssas
At 01:43 AM 7/26/2003 +0200, Bonny wrote:
Hello!
I'm using spamassassin 2.44 and would like to know
a) the difference with the latest release (2.55 afair)...
There's a very significant difference.
First, 2.44's spamd has a buffer overflow vulnerability. This wasn't
completly fixed till 2.50 so
13 matches
Mail list logo
