On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 15:51, Ryan Bingham wrote:
> Did anyone ever figure out a fix for this on Exchange 2000? It will be a
> while before I can migrate to 2003.
>
> To recap: the problem involves retrieving intact headers from messages
> moved to Public Folders on Exchange 2000.
>
> Thanks,
>
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] exchange and IMAP Public Folder messages
Guys,
FYI I have upgrade to Exchange 2003 and there is no longer a problem
with full headers being retrieved by IMAP, even if some messages are
"posts" in the public folders and others are "no
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:39 PM
To: Bingham, Ryan; Tom Meunier; Martin Bene
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] exchange and IMAP Public Folder messages
Guys,
FYI I have upgrade to Exchange 2003 and there is no longer a problem
with full headers being
Tom Meunier wrote:
I don't know how you're doing this, but my Ham and Spam public folders work exactly as specified. Are you certain your users aren't forwarding them there, but rather dragging & dropping from Outlook? Are your users connecting to the server via IMAP or MAPI? (We don't use IMAP
Covington, Chris wrote:
Ryan,
I've found that if mail is sent directly to a mail-enabled Public
Folder's email address, IE from amavisd-new or Postfix, its headers will
make it through with IMAP. However, if an email is moved to or from a
Public Folder with Outlook (regardless of whether or not
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>I don't know how you're doing this, but my Ham and Spam public folders
work exactly as
>specified. Are you certain your users aren't forwarding them there,
but rather dragging
>& dropping from Outlook? Are your users conne
Tony Hoyle wrote:
Try in OutlookSpy... if you view the Imessage and look for PR_INTERNET_CONTENT that
will contain the exact text of the original message. If PR_INTERNET_CONTENT is
missing the
original message is lost.
If that attribute is there it should be relatively trivial to write an app wh
Hi Chris,
>What you're describing also happens to me. My question is,
>what happens when you open the message that you've moved
>to the public folder with an IMAP client? Does it maintain
>the full email headers in the IMAP client? For the 3 of us,
>Outlook still shows the full headers but
-Original Message-
> From: Covington, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 August 2003 17:39
> To: Ryan Bingham; Tom Meunier; Martin Bene
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] exchange and IMAP Public Folder messages
>
>
> Guys,
>
> FYI I
Guys,
FYI I have upgrade to Exchange 2003 and there is no longer a problem
with full headers being retrieved by IMAP, even if some messages are
"posts" in the public folders and others are "notes." And also,
PR_INTERNET_CONTENT still disappears on messages moved to the public
folders, but it does
ave the problem...
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Bingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 9:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] exchange and IMAP Public Folder messages
Tony Hoyle wrote:
>Try in OutlookSpy... if you view the Imessage and look fo
Hi Chris,
>Tony et al. I guess I'll let the cat out of the bag. Tom Meunier
>discovered the M$-known issue. The problem is
>http://support.microsoft.com/?id=817809 which is basically that public
>folders' emails are treated as PR_MESSAGE_CLASS IPM.Note instead of
>IPM.Post.
>Those of you who d
-Original Message-
>From: Martin Bene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Headers are still there; I haven't used a "normal mail client, instead
>I use teh perl script posted on the list earlier this year:
>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&m=104806917615490&w=2
>
>The downloade
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 03:41, Martin Bene wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> >make it through with IMAP. However, if an email is moved to or from a
> >Public Folder with Outlook (regardless of whether or not the public
> >folder is mail-enabled), then its headers get truncated.
>
> I can not confirm that.
> -Original Message-
> From: Covington, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 August 2003 16:15
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] exchange and IMAP Public Folder messages
>
>
> Tony et al. I guess I'll let the cat out of the bag. To
>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:39 PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] exchange and IMAP Public Folder messages
Guys,
FYI I have upgrade to Exchange 2003 and there is no longer a problem
with full headers being retrieved by IMAP, even if some messages are
"posts&qu
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Bingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ ]
> Once they drag them into the Public Folder, as you point out, the
> headers get truncated. I've even resorted to trying to
> reconstruct the
> original message by copying what little header information
> Outl
> -Original Message-
> From: Covington, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:33 PM
> To: Tom Meunier; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] exchange and IMAP Public Folder messages
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
Hi Chris,
>make it through with IMAP. However, if an email is moved to or from a
>Public Folder with Outlook (regardless of whether or not the public
>folder is mail-enabled), then its headers get truncated.
I can not confirm that. I'm using outlook 2000-SR1 (9.0.0.5414) + exchange
server 2000
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Bingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 August 2003 20:20
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] exchange and IMAP Public Folder messages
>
> Even more frustrating, Windows IMAP and POP clients have the
> same
-Original Message-
>From: Tony Hoyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Unfortunately that's not it... Your message for example shows
>up as an IPM.Note, and when I copy it to the public spam folder
>it remains an IPM.Note, except exchange deletes the
>PR_INTERNET_CONTENT property while copying.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Bene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>If I tell you that it "just worked" for me, this probably isn't very
helpful.
>Still:
> * I created the public folder in Outlook and selected "email" as
folder type.
> * mail dropped in the new folder apears as a
> -Original Message-
> From: AltGrendel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 August 2003 17:41
> To: SA-Talk
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] exchange and IMAP Public Folder messages
>
>
> > But I've noticed that Exchange 2000 Public Folders in IMAP
> mode
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Bingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Tony (or anyone else in the know),
>
>Could you post more details about how you were able to handle the
>headers problem in Exchange 2000? I have had the same problems as
Chris
>extracting meaningful header information fro
Tony Hoyle wrote:
If you can write some software to fetch it, the original text of the email is stored
in exchange 2000 (not 5.5, which always reconstructs the text from its MAPI
information).
I had a play with it and you can retrieve the original email in a lot of cases, but
in (seemingly random
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 18:44, Covington, Chris wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> RH 9, amavisd-new 06162003, Postfix 2.0.13, SA 2.55.
>
> I've been using the wonderful script from:
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&m=105622875610715&w=2
>
> I instruct users to move undetected SPAM to Publ
This doesn't seem to be the problem in exchange 5.5
I know what you mean by not being able to ditch exchange. :::Sigh:: ONE
DAY!!
-Original Message-
From: Covington, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 3:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
RH 9, amavisd-new
Hi all,
RH 9, amavisd-new 06162003, Postfix 2.0.13, SA 2.55.
I've been using the wonderful script from:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&m=105622875610715&w=2
I instruct users to move undetected SPAM to Public Folders.
But I've noticed that Exchange 2000 Public Folders in IMAP
28 matches
Mail list logo
