On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 18:44, Covington, Chris wrote: > Hi all, > > RH 9, amavisd-new 06162003, Postfix 2.0.13, SA 2.55. > > I've been using the wonderful script from: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&m=105622875610715&w=2 > > I instruct users to move undetected SPAM to Public Folders. > > But I've noticed that Exchange 2000 Public Folders in IMAP mode seems to > truncate mail headers, leaving (sometimes) only the last few received > headers and not all. > > I first assumed this was a problem with Mail::IMAPClient and its > message_to_file call when working with Exchange. > I then used Pine to access the same message and the headers are also > missing. > > So basically it's an Exchange problem when messages are pulled from > Public Folders. This doesn't happen when IMAP accesses a user's > mailbox. > > My questions: First, has anyone found a workaround? Second, is it OK to > sa-learn on messages that don't have complete headers (but do have > complete bodies)? > > I've attached an example of the behavior in my case. ham1 is an email > pulled with Pine/Mail::IMAPClient and ham1.exchange is an email pulled > from Outlook. > > I guess everyone should ditch the Public Folder method... unless > Exchange 5.5 or 2003 don't have this problem. > > Chris > > ps - yeah, yeah I know ditch Exchange altogether ;) That's not an > option, unfortunately
Is the public folder mail enabled? I'm not sure if it will make a difference, but you could try that. -- AltGrendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Visit the SpamAssassin rules wiki at www.exit0.us ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
