RE: [SAtalk] Upgrade problem . . .

2003-12-09 Thread Jeff Funk
d downloading the source and making manually. I get the same failure during 'make test'. -Original Message- From: Bill Landry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 7:34 PM To: Jeff Funk Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade problem . . . Did you install the Time::Hi

[SAtalk] Upgrade problem . . .

2003-12-09 Thread Jeff Funk
I'm trying upgrade on CPAN and I keep getting failed tests like below: t/spamc_c_stdout_closed.spamd start failed: log: debug: Score set 0 chosen. debug: Preloading modules with HOME=/tmp/spamd-57489-init Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for non-method Time::HiRes::time() is deprecated at ../blib/li

[SAtalk] upgrade 2.44 to 2.60

2003-12-09 Thread tst
I did an upgrade/install from 2.44 to 2.60 and I'm not sure what is going on? I installed 2.60 (tgz file) everything went ok. but had error messages in my mail log telling me that i need 2.44 but running 2.60. I unistalled both versions and reinstalled 2.60 and now it's not working. I'm using

RE: [SAtalk] Upgrade or Stay?

2003-11-17 Thread Todd Schuldt
/mail/spamassassin and restart spamd Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MIKE YRABEDRA Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:37 AM To: SPAMASSASSIN Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade or Stay? on 11/17/03 10:13 AM, Todd Schuldt at [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [SAtalk] Upgrade or Stay?

2003-11-17 Thread Erik Slooff
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens > MIKE YRABEDRA > Verzonden: maandag 17 november 2003 17:37 > Aan: SPAMASSASSIN > Onderwerp: Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade or Stay? > > > on 11/17/03 10:13 AM, Todd Schu

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade or Stay?

2003-11-17 Thread Chris Trudeau
Mike, Check out Chris Santerre's emporium... http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm CT - Original Message - From: "MIKE YRABEDRA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "SPAMASSASSIN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 1

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade or Stay?

2003-11-17 Thread MIKE YRABEDRA
on 11/17/03 10:13 AM, Todd Schuldt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > SA 2.6 with popcorn/weeds/evil rulesets added What are these rulesets and how are they added? ++ Mike Yrabedra (President) 323 Incorporated Home of MacDock.com, MacAgent.com and MacShi

RE: [SAtalk] Upgrade or Stay?

2003-11-17 Thread Paul Hutchings
It's hard to quantify as we didn't have a great deal get through with 2.5x, but I would have to say that in the short (6 months or so) that I've been using SA, 2.60 is the best version so far.. still staggered that it's all free! regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel

RE: [SAtalk] Upgrade or Stay?

2003-11-17 Thread Dan Kohn
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 05:44 To: SpamAssassin List Subject: [SAtalk] Upgrade or Stay? Yo ye cognoscenti, I've been running 2.55 since it came out, but since about the time 2.60 was released have been immersed in other things and not following the list discu

RE: [SAtalk] Upgrade or Stay?

2003-11-17 Thread Todd Schuldt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jess Anderson Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 7:44 AM To: SpamAssassin List Subject: [SAtalk] Upgrade or Stay? Yo ye cognoscenti, I've been running 2.55 since it came out, but since about the time 2.6

[SAtalk] Upgrade from source to CPAN?

2003-11-13 Thread Chris Santerre
Anything that needs to be watched out for when upgrading from source install to CPAN? I usually do source, but figured I would try CPAN for SA, as it has worked great for other packages. Any files I need to make sure are deleted? Any little ones hiding in the shadows to bite me in the bum? :) Als

Re: [SAtalk] upgrade to 2.60 broke SA

2003-10-20 Thread Matt Kettler
At 01:04 PM 10/19/2003, Masoud Pajoh wrote: I was running SA 2.5 with kmail and all was well, then I upgraded to version 2.60. Now, SA stopped pocessing incoming mail all togther. How can I correct this. Well, what exactly do you mean by "stopped processing incoming mail?" Do you mean that the me

[SAtalk] upgrade to 2.60 broke SA

2003-10-19 Thread Masoud Pajoh
Hi all: I was running SA 2.5 with kmail and all was well, then I upgraded to version 2.60. Now, SA stopped pocessing incoming mail all togther. How can I correct this. I use RH 9 with all the updates. Thanks for any suggestion, and sorry if this is an FAQ, I looked but could not find the answ

Re: [SAtalk] upgrade

2003-10-16 Thread Matt Kettler
At 05:20 AM 10/16/03 -0700, Doug Wolfgram wrote: I just deleted 2.55 from my system and installed 2.60 via RPMs. Although spamassassin is running (ps -ax | grep spamd) when i run the spam test message through it says spam score:0 and 'template not found' What template is it looking for?? It's lo

[SAtalk] upgrade

2003-10-16 Thread Doug Wolfgram
I just deleted 2.55 from my system and installed 2.60 via RPMs. Although spamassassin is running (ps -ax | grep spamd) when i run the spam test message through it says spam score:0 and 'template not found' What template is it looking for?? D ___ "Interactive Media that

[SAtalk] Upgrade your SA! (was: image only porn)

2003-10-13 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Monday, October 13, 2003 6:04 PM -0400 "Carl R. Friend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Do. 2.60 fixes quite a few things, shuts down now-long-gone > RBLs, improves scoring, and (even though I was originally a > skeptic) performs well enough (sans Bayes). And like anti-virus software, anti-

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade

2003-10-05 Thread Matt Kettler
At 03:16 AM 10/6/03 +0200, Jim Knuth wrote: >>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no >> version=2.60 >>Why is autolearn=no ? > What are your autolearn thresholds set to? bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -1 bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 7 well, then it won

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade

2003-10-05 Thread Matt Kettler
At 04:54 AM 10/5/03 +0200, Jim Knuth wrote: Hallo SA-List, since I upgraded of V 2.60 have I no tests (only bayes). --snip X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60 --snap Why is autolearn=no ? What are your autolearn thresholds set to? Bear in mi

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade

2003-10-05 Thread Jim Knuth
Hallo Matt Kettler, am Montag, 6. Oktober 2003, 03:00:29, schriebst Du: > At 04:54 AM 10/5/03 +0200, Jim Knuth wrote: >>Hallo SA-List, >> >> since I upgraded of V 2.60 have I no tests (only bayes). >>--snip >>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no >> versio

[SAtalk] Upgrade

2003-10-04 Thread Jim Knuth
Hallo SA-List, since I upgraded of V 2.60 have I no tests (only bayes). --snip X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60 --snap Why is autolearn=no ? -- Viele Grüße, best regards Jim Knuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Zitat -- Bei den

[SAtalk] Upgrade

2003-10-04 Thread Jim Knuth
Hallo SA-List, since I upgraded of V 2.60 have I no tests (only bayes). --snip X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60 --snap Why is autolearn=no ? -- Viele Grüße, best regards Jim Knuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Zitat -- Kolibris

[SAtalk] upgrade spamassassin from 2.44 to 2.55 on redhat 9

2003-08-31 Thread Andreas Mueller
Hi, i have fetchmail, sendmail, procmail and spamassassin 2.44 running and everything works like a charm. as the description of the rpm-package of spamassassin says, i just added: PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/bin INCLUDERC=/etc/mail/spamassassin/spamassassin-default.rc to my /etc/proc

Re: [SAtalk] upgrade spamassassin from 2.44 to 2.55 on redhat 9

2003-08-31 Thread Matt Kettler
At 02:47 PM 8/31/03 +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote: But NOTHING is filtered anymore? Why? First thing I'd suggest is running spamassassin --lint. This will tell you if spamassassin is unhappy with your user_prefs or local.cf and is spitting it out as a result. There are a few options that were pre

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to 2.5?

2003-06-09 Thread Justin Shore
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Scott Rothgaber wrote: > Good Morning! > > After hearing about SpamAssassin on the BSDI-Users list I decided to > build a box and check it out. Most impressive! I'm running v2.43 from > the FreeBSD 5.0 ports collection. > > Questions: > > 1) This version seems to be doing th

[SAtalk] Upgrade to 2.5?

2003-06-09 Thread Scott Rothgaber
Good Morning! After hearing about SpamAssassin on the BSDI-Users list I decided to build a box and check it out. Most impressive! I'm running v2.43 from the FreeBSD 5.0 ports collection. Questions: 1) This version seems to be doing the trick for me. I'm still tweaking some of the values but I'm

Re: SOLVED (Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade)

2002-12-17 Thread Justin Mason
Mark said: > Perhaps useful to know for others: Perl 5.005_03 needs "Errno.pm" in spamd > 2.43. This does not show up on needed dependencies, nor in the "make test" > run. The test just fails to start spamd (and you do not get to see why, cuz > it redirects STDERR to /dev/null). that's wierd --

SOLVED (Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade)

2002-12-13 Thread Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org --- "If you were supposed to understand it, we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx - Original Message - From: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jonathan Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade

2002-12-12 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "Jonathan Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 9:33 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade > > > > How easy is it to upgrade from 2.01

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade

2002-12-11 Thread Jonathan Nichols
> > How easy is it to upgrade from 2.01 to 2.43? Do I need to make substantion > config-changes? Is an upgrade even needed? > It's very easy. I did it not too long ago.. just did "install Mail::SpamAssassin" from CPAN. You might want to check the new manpage for spamd, as I think there were a few

[SAtalk] Upgrade

2002-12-11 Thread Mark
Hello, How easy is it to upgrade from 2.01 to 2.43? Do I need to make substantion config-changes? Is an upgrade even needed? Thanks! - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org --- "If you were supposed to understand it, we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx --

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to 2.43 = debug?

2002-11-08 Thread Drew Dowling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Well, I don't think this debug info is from SA (I've never seen this info > before). Personally, I would run spamassassin with a -D. I'm going to > guess the debug info is from DCC, Pyzor, or Razor (although it doesn't > look like that either). T

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to 2.43 = debug?

2002-11-08 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 03:05:25PM -0500, Drew Dowling wrote: > I've been a happy and silent user of SA for a while now. Running 2.30 now > for a whild I recently got a wild hair and decided to spend the ten > minutes needed to upgrade to 2.43. I'm just using SA as a user with > procmail, so the

[SAtalk] Upgrade to 2.43 = debug?

2002-11-08 Thread Drew Dowling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've been a happy and silent user of SA for a while now. Running 2.30 now for a whild I recently got a wild hair and decided to spend the ten minutes needed to upgrade to 2.43. I'm just using SA as a user with procmail, so the readme seemed cool to m

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade breaks SpamAssassin

2002-10-18 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Paulo Ney de Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Our sys-admin here in Berkeley upgraded SpamAssassin this week to > version 2.42 and all of a sudden it stop working form me! > After a lot of research I found that the culprit was an EMPTY file named > "rules" in my home directory that was causing

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade/rollback issues

2002-10-10 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:13:03AM -0500, Kip Turk wrote: > I seem to remember something on the list regarding critical failures on > upgrades from 2.20 to 2.4x, but couldn't google it out of the archives. > If I remember correctly, I need to install 2.3x, then upgrade to 2.42. No, that's no

[SAtalk] Upgrade/rollback issues

2002-10-10 Thread Kip Turk
I recently attempted to upgrade on of my systems using the CPAN install feature. Since I was running 2.20 and CPAN pulled down 2.42, I ran into some very bad things. As soon as 2.42 was installed, the system locked up. No errors, just complete system lock up. At the console, I came up wit

RE: [SAtalk] Upgrade 2.41?

2002-09-17 Thread McClung, Darren W.
I upgraded from 2.31 to 2.41 w/Razor2 about a week ago and have noticed a substantial improvement. Many fewer false-positives, (none so far) and no false negatives. I'd say go ahead and upgrade. Darren _ I noticed since the latest version was released that a va

[SAtalk] Upgrade 2.41?

2002-09-17 Thread Eric Mings
I noticed since the latest version was released that a variety of people have mentioned that it hasn't worked as well (rules changes) for them as the earlier version. I remember someone suggesting waiting for 2.5 before updating. Any thoughts on this? I would like to update but not sure whether to

[SAtalk] Upgrade Question

2002-07-24 Thread Richard J . Sears
I am ready (I think) to upgrade from 2.20 but I have made a large number of changes to the actual spamd/spamc, spamassassin and the rule sets themselves. I have the new version downloaded and ready to go, but I am assuming that if I backup everything up and install the new version, I would just n

[SAtalk] upgrade path

2002-05-22 Thread Ron Nau
can someone confirm that the upgrade path from 2.01 to 2.20 is simply to install again?  I can't find any mention of upgrading in the source or documentation (other than the Makefile warning that uninstall is deprecated) but can't find any reason not to re-install   it would appear that any

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-29 Thread Jeffrey J. Bacon
I'm using the standard IMAP server that comes with Red Hat LInux 7.1. I thought procmail was a mail delivery program??? BTW. I have a .procmailrc in my user's home dir that filters mail to subfolders and works no problem -- only when I have that global procmailrc file activated does mail fail

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-29 Thread Craig Hughes
I'm guessing you need to use some kind of deliver program to get the mail to the right place -- what IMAP server is that? It seems to not be expecting the user's mail spool to change without knowing about it, which seems like a weird thing to do in a mail server, but as I said, it probably wants

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-28 Thread Olivier Nicole
goh yeah, and this in my main log when the mailbox is accessed: > > Mar 28 22:58:55 bacon imapd[8163]: Fatal mailbox error user={user_name} > host={a_host} [{an_ip}] mbx=/var/spool/mail/{user_name}: Unexpected changes to > mailbox (try restarting): Return-Path: Jeffrey J. Bacon wrote: > > I ha

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-28 Thread Jeffrey J. Bacon
oh yeah, and this in my main log when the mailbox is accessed: Mar 28 22:58:55 bacon imapd[8163]: Fatal mailbox error user={user_name} host={a_host} [{an_ip}] mbx=/var/spool/mail/{user_name}: Unexpected changes to mailbox (try restarting): Return-Path: I have: > > VERBOSE=yes > LOGABSTRACT=al

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-28 Thread Jeffrey J. Bacon
I have: VERBOSE=yes LOGABSTRACT=all LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail/procmaillog.`date +%m-%d-%y` :0fw | spamc -u $LOGNAME in my /etc/procmailrc file and then this in my main procmail log: procmail: Executing "spamc,-u,{user_name}" procmail: [8286] Thu Mar 28 22:58:05 2002 procmail: Assigning "PATH=/

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-28 Thread Olivier Nicole
For all debugging purposes, I suggest one runs spamd without the -d, and maybe with -D to see debug information onf screen. The running as root message is just a warning, not an error, and should not prevent spamc/d to tag the message (it can prevent it to create user preferences, for that purooi

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-28 Thread Jeff Bacon
I'll throw my 2-cents in and let y'all know I have the same problem Gene Ruebsamen wrote: > Quoting Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >>>when I run spamc < sample-spam.txt > spam.out >>>spamc seems to work; however, when I receive an incoming mail message, I >> >>get >> >>Does it work or

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-27 Thread Gene Ruebsamen
Quoting Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > when I run spamc < sample-spam.txt > spam.out > > spamc seems to work; however, when I receive an incoming mail message, I > get > > Does it work or not? Do you get a SA header in the output? Running spamc < sample-spam.txt > spam.out as a non-roo

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-27 Thread Olivier Nicole
> when I run spamc < sample-spam.txt > spam.out > spamc seems to work; however, when I receive an incoming mail message, I get Does it work or not? Do you get a SA header in the output? > the same error in the maillog: > > Mar 27 16:55:05 mail spamd[2590]: connection from sandman.realtyroad.co

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-27 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 05:54:37PM -0800, Gene Ruebsamen wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using the src .tar.gz file I downloaded and compiled myself. > > perl Makefile.PL > make > make install (as root) > > I may have spoken too soon, becuase I am still having the same exact problem > as before. > when

RE: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-27 Thread Gene Ruebsamen
> I see similar behavior, but my spamassasin is working, but I still see in > my maillog the line about "Still running as root:" > Mar 27 19:26:48 spamassasin spamd[25004]: identified spam (25/5) for > kenk:99 in 1 seconds. > Mar 27 19:28:11 spamassasin spamd[24987]: connection from > mercury.s

RE: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-27 Thread Gene Ruebsamen
-talk@lists. sourceforge. net > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!) > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 05:00:29PM -0800, Gene Ruebsamen wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Just recently upgraded to SpamAssassin 2.11 from 2.01 and now > my spamd is

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-27 Thread Brian
I see similar behavior, but my spamassasin is working, but I still see in my maillog the line about "Still running as root:" Mar 27 19:26:48 spamassasin spamd[25004]: identified spam (25/5) for kenk:99 in 1 seconds. Mar 27 19:28:11 spamassasin spamd[24987]: connection from mercury.shreve.ne

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-27 Thread Daniel Rogers
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 05:21:54PM -0800, Gene Ruebsamen wrote: > Apparently, the previous version of SA (2.01) used > /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf as the configuration file, and this new > version requires the configuration file to be called: spamassassin.cf That's odd, I'm using that file wi

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-27 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 05:21:54PM -0800, Gene Ruebsamen wrote: > I figured out the problem... > > Apparently, the previous version of SA (2.01) used > /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf as the configuration file, and this new > version requires the configuration file to be called: spamassassin.cf >

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-27 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 05:00:29PM -0800, Gene Ruebsamen wrote: > Hello, > > Just recently upgraded to SpamAssassin 2.11 from 2.01 and now my spamd is > not working properly. All mails are getting through, and nothing it going > through spam assassin. > > The Spamassassin perl script works fine

RE: [SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-27 Thread Gene Ruebsamen
, you may want to put this into the FAQ. Thank You, Gene Ruebsamen > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gene > Ruebsamen > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:00 PM > To: Spamassassin-talk@lists. sourceforge. net > Subject

[SAtalk] Upgrade to SpamAssassin 2.11 (spamd not working!)

2002-03-27 Thread Gene Ruebsamen
Hello, Just recently upgraded to SpamAssassin 2.11 from 2.01 and now my spamd is not working properly. All mails are getting through, and nothing it going through spam assassin. The Spamassassin perl script works fine with the test mails; however, I have been using the spamc/spamd combo since 2