Dan Wing; Theo Van Dinter; Dean Gallea;
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for
SpamAssassin is here
I still don't get it. The report is not in attachment, the original message
is. The report is in message body.
- Original Me
Harri Pesonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I want to know: If I use Outlook Express and SAproxy, and get
> *SPAM*, then the original message is in attachment, and spam status
> is in headers, and also the message body has changed, it contains now
> "Content analysis details". What if I create
uot;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for
SpamAssassin is here
> If SpamAssassin is set to 'repo
uot;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:22 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for
SpamAssassin is here
> No, the answer is yes. If the repo
t;; "'Mike Burger'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 11:48 PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for
SpamAssassin is here
> Wow, too many assumptions left unsaid. L
arri Pesonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 10:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for
> SpamAssassin is her
L PROTECTED]>
To: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Harri Pesonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: [S
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Dan Wing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Theo Van Dinter"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtal
L PROTECTED]>; "Theo Van Dinter"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for
SpamAssas
No, it does not handle it correctly, so you should not learn messages that
have already been detected as spam. This is one thing that should be
improved (the VB6 source code is there).
SpamAddIn could also work like SpamBayes: Put the spam status and analysis
into user definable fields when it is
IL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "'Dan Wing'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Theo Van Dinter'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Mike Burger'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 5:42 P
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Harri Pesonen wrote:
> No, it does not handle it correctly, so you should not learn messages
> that have already been detected as spam. This is one thing that should
> be improved (the VB6 source code is there).
I believe this is really a weakness in SpamAssassin itself -- tha
ot;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 12:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for
> SpamAssassin is here
>
>
&
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:44 AM
To: Dean Gallea; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for
SpamAssassin is here
The problem here is that it says ' "real" message encapsulated as a
message/r
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Harri Pesonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cc: "Dan Wing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Theo Van Dinter"
eport before learning. But this is a minimal message: the
body is just a URL. No words to learn.
-- Dean
Coffee (n.), a person who is coughed upon.
-Original Message-
From: Harri Pesonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:44 AM
To: Dean Gallea; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PRO
000--
- Original Message -
From: "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Harri Pesonen'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:21 AM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for
SpamAssassin is here
> Har
Cc: "Dan Wing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Theo Van Dinter"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 5:49 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlo
ECTED]>; "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 5:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for
> SpamAssassin is here
>
>
> > What's to
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> The bayes system won't learn already learned messages (as per the
> Message-ID header). That's that whole bayes_seen db.
>
> There was a bug where messages w/out the Message-ID header could be
> learned/forgotten multiple times. That's fixed in 2.60.
Dan Wing writes:
> On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Harri Pesonen wrote:
>
> > No, it does not handle it correctly, so you should not learn messages
> > that have already been detected as spam. This is one thing that should
> > be improved (the VB6 source code is there).
>
> I believe this is really a weakne
21 matches
Mail list logo
