What's to get? If you use the two options I gave you, the report will be in the headers, and won't affect your ability to properly report the spam.
Try it and see. On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Harri Pesonen wrote: > I still don't get it. The report is not in attachment, the original message > is. The report is in message body. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Harri Pesonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Dan Wing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Theo Van Dinter" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 12:02 PM > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for > SpamAssassin is here > > > > If you edit your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and insert the following > > lines: > > > > report_safe 0 > > use_terse_report 0 > > > > You'll find that the report is put into the message headers, instead of as > > a MIME attachment. > > > > On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Harri Pesonen wrote: > > > > > Are you saying, that if SA inserts the original e-mail as an attachment, > > > then it is OK to feed this message to sa-learn, even if it has a new > body > > > text: > > > > > > "This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached > > > along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted > > > mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. > > > > > > Content preview: Loading image ... URI:http://www32.com/gh/ > > > URI:http://www32.com/gh/ghad.jpg URI:http://www32.com/gh/rm.htm > > > URI:http://www32.com/gh/rm.gif [...] > > > > > > Content analysis details: (19.70 points, 5 required) > > > X_MSMAIL_PRIORITY_HIGH (0.0 points) Sent with 'X-Msmail-Priority' set > to > > > high > > > X_PRIORITY_HIGH (1.9 points) Sent with 'X-Priority' set to high > > > FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS (0.6 points) From: ends in numbers > > > MSGID_OE_SPAM_4ZERO (4.3 points) Message-Id generated by spam tool > > > (4-zeroes variant) > > > INVALID_DATE (0.6 points) Invalid Date: header (not RFC 2822) > > > MSGID_SPAMSIGN_ZEROES (4.3 points) Message-Id generated by spam tool > > > (zeroes variant) > > > HTML_80_90 (0.5 points) BODY: Message is 80% to 90% HTML > > > BAYES_60 (1.1 points) BODY: Bayesian classifier says spam > > > probability is 60 to 70% > > > [score: 0.6024] > > > HTML_MESSAGE (0.0 points) BODY: HTML included in message > > > HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_02 (1.4 points) BODY: HTML has images with 0-200 bytes > of > > > words > > > MSGID_OUTLOOK_TIME (4.4 points) Message-Id is fake (in Outlook Express > > > format) > > > DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 (0.1 points) Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: > > > date > > > MIME_HTML_ONLY (0.1 points) Message only has text/html MIME parts > > > PRIORITY_NO_NAME (0.4 points) Message has priority setting, but no > > > X-Mailer > > > > > > The original message did not contain plain text, and may be unsafe to > > > open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, > > > or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view > > > it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor." > > > > > > I want to be 100% sure about this! :-) > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Dan Wing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Cc: "Harri Pesonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 10:32 PM > > > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for > > > SpamAssassin is here > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > > > > > > > > The bayes system won't learn already learned messages (as per the > > > > > Message-ID header). That's that whole bayes_seen db. > > > > > > > > > > There was a bug where messages w/out the Message-ID header could be > > > > > learned/forgotten multiple times. That's fixed in 2.60. > > > > > > > > > > sa-learn looks for the X-Spam-Status header, and if it exists, it'll > > > > > remove the markup from the message, so report_safe mails are fine. > > > > > > > > Ah. I had thought it didn't work based on some testing I did, but > > > > obviously my testing was flawed. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > -d > -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Pound II BBS telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000 To be notified of updates to the web site, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a message of: subscribe ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
