Are you saying, that if SA inserts the original e-mail as an attachment, then it is OK to feed this message to sa-learn, even if it has a new body text:
"This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Content preview: Loading image ... URI:http://www32.com/gh/ URI:http://www32.com/gh/ghad.jpg URI:http://www32.com/gh/rm.htm URI:http://www32.com/gh/rm.gif [...] Content analysis details: (19.70 points, 5 required) X_MSMAIL_PRIORITY_HIGH (0.0 points) Sent with 'X-Msmail-Priority' set to high X_PRIORITY_HIGH (1.9 points) Sent with 'X-Priority' set to high FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS (0.6 points) From: ends in numbers MSGID_OE_SPAM_4ZERO (4.3 points) Message-Id generated by spam tool (4-zeroes variant) INVALID_DATE (0.6 points) Invalid Date: header (not RFC 2822) MSGID_SPAMSIGN_ZEROES (4.3 points) Message-Id generated by spam tool (zeroes variant) HTML_80_90 (0.5 points) BODY: Message is 80% to 90% HTML BAYES_60 (1.1 points) BODY: Bayesian classifier says spam probability is 60 to 70% [score: 0.6024] HTML_MESSAGE (0.0 points) BODY: HTML included in message HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_02 (1.4 points) BODY: HTML has images with 0-200 bytes of words MSGID_OUTLOOK_TIME (4.4 points) Message-Id is fake (in Outlook Express format) DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 (0.1 points) Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date MIME_HTML_ONLY (0.1 points) Message only has text/html MIME parts PRIORITY_NO_NAME (0.4 points) Message has priority setting, but no X-Mailer The original message did not contain plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor." I want to be 100% sure about this! :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Wing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Harri Pesonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 10:32 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for SpamAssassin is here > On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > > The bayes system won't learn already learned messages (as per the > > Message-ID header). That's that whole bayes_seen db. > > > > There was a bug where messages w/out the Message-ID header could be > > learned/forgotten multiple times. That's fixed in 2.60. > > > > sa-learn looks for the X-Spam-Status header, and if it exists, it'll > > remove the markup from the message, so report_safe mails are fine. > > Ah. I had thought it didn't work based on some testing I did, but > obviously my testing was flawed. > > Thanks. > -d ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
