I would say A3 = YES (with SpamAddIn at least, if the message has internet
headers), but how can B1 and B2 be YES or MAYBE? This is news to me.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Harri Pesonen'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Mike Burger'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 11:48 PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for
SpamAssassin is here


> Wow, too many assumptions left unsaid. Let's try to clarify:
>
> Scenario A: User sets report_safe 0 (SAProxy's "Low Safety") = Leave
> original spam messages alone, put report in headers
> Scenario B: User sets report_safe 1 (SAProxy's "Normal Safety" default) =
> encapsulate original spam messages and put report in body
> Mail reader 1: Non-MS (such as Eudora, Mozilla), messages in an "official"
> mbox file, with MIME attachments as per the RFC spec
> Mail reader 2: Outlook Express, spam messages converted using third-party
> utility to mbox format with structure/attachments intact per RFC
> Mail reader 3: Outlook, spam messages converted using to mbox format using
> third-party utility with structure altered to not comply with RFC
>
> The answers to the question "can SA-learn properly learn my spam", as I
> understand them, are as follows:
>
> A1, A2, B1 = YES
> B2 = Maybe (Can anyone confirm that messages so converted get properly
> learned?)
> A3, B3 = NO
>
> -- Dean
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harri Pesonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 1:24 PM
> To: Mike Burger
> Cc: Dan Wing; Theo Van Dinter; Dean Gallea;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for
> SpamAssassin is here
>
>
> Okay, this is now clear. And the answer to my question is "no".
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Harri Pesonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Dan Wing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Theo Van Dinter"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 8:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: [Spamassassin-saproxy] Outlook Add-In for
> SpamAssassin is here
>
>
> > If SpamAssassin is set to 'report_safe 0", the entire spam report,
> > including the analysis, is in the header.
> >
> > On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Harri Pesonen wrote:
> >
> > > But if the original message is in attachment, spam status in
> > > headers,
> and
> > > content analysis in message body text, does sa-learn handle it
> correctly?
> > >
>
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to