Title: Advice on gateway config?
I'm building a small gateway that will sit in front of an Exchange system - sending 'ham' through to the user and redirecting 'spam' to another email address - which will be a 'public' folder probably.
Scott L Henderson's guide to using Amavis and Postfix t
> -Original Message-
> From: AltGrendel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 9:05 AM
> To: SA-Talk
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Advice on how to create this rule
>
>
> On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 19:40, Stevens, John wrote:
> > Hi All,
> &g
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 19:40, Stevens, John wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am using SA 2.55 on a linux box (Cobalt Raq3) and have whitelisted our
> domain and a couple of others we handle. We are having problems with
> sender addresses of the form "joe blogs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and
> recipient <[EMAIL PROTE
Hi All,
I am using SA 2.55 on a linux box (Cobalt Raq3) and have whitelisted our
domain and a couple of others we handle. We are having problems with
sender addresses of the form "joe blogs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and
recipient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> , in other words smtp address of the
sender and recip
--On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:30 PM -0700 Marek Dohojda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it seems a lot of resumes are marked spam!
It would be useful to build a corpus of these for GA training. Are they
confidential? Are they triggering particular rules?
-
Thank you!
-Original Message-
From: Steve Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 4:33 PM
To: Marek Dohojda
Cc: 'Rick Macdougall'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 03:44:09PM -0700, Marek Dohojda is rumored to have
said:
>
> On the same note, I didn't se
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 03:44:09PM -0700, Marek Dohojda is rumored to have said:
>
> On the same note, I didn't see documentation for local.cf and user_defaults.
> Is there a place for this?
man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
--
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
- Thomas W
You could modify the person's spamassassin user preference file and
adjust required_hits to be a higher number.. so less e-mail are marked
spam.
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 18:30, Marek Dohojda wrote:
> I need to make sure that I mark one e-mail box as being able to receive
> spams (it seems a lot of r
I love community!!
Thank you everyone...
On the same note, I didn't see documentation for local.cf and user_defaults.
Is there a place for this?
Again once again Thank you!!
Marek
-Original Message-
From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:43 PM
Hi,
Marek Dohojda wrote:
I need to make sure that I mark one e-mail box as being able to receive
spams (it seems a lot of resumes are marked spam!). I don't see option in
that since whitelist_from isn't right, it be more like whitelist_to (option
that I don't see).
What would be best thing to do
I need to make sure that I mark one e-mail box as being able to receive
spams (it seems a lot of resumes are marked spam!). I don't see option in
that since whitelist_from isn't right, it be more like whitelist_to (option
that I don't see).
What would be best thing to do in this case? Should I a
- Original Message -
From: "Vivek Khera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Advice Please
> >>>>> "AL" == Alan Leghart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> AL&g
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > "L" == Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> L> The default formatting for Lotus iNotes messages is RichText (base64
> L> encoding).
> >> How does rich text imply base64 encoding? Apple Mail can do rich
> >> text, but it is sent clear.
>
> L> You
> "L" == Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
L> The default formatting for Lotus iNotes messages is RichText (base64
L> encoding).
>> How does rich text imply base64 encoding? Apple Mail can do rich
>> text, but it is sent clear.
L> You will need to ask IBM/Lotus why they do not do it the way
>L> The default formatting for Lotus iNotes messages is RichText (base64
>L> encoding).
>How does rich text imply base64 encoding? Apple Mail can do rich
>text, but it is sent clear.
You will need to ask IBM/Lotus why they do not do it the way Apple Mail does
;-)
--
> "L" == Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
L> The default formatting for Lotus iNotes messages is RichText (base64
L> encoding).
How does rich text imply base64 encoding? Apple Mail can do rich
text, but it is sent clear.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
< > They could be using pound signs, and the MUA in question is deciding
that
< > that needs base64 encoding (obviously not the right thing to do, but
< > there you go.) Any idea what the MUA was?
< >
<
< Lotus I-Notes is what they said when I spoke to them on the phone. I
< don't know anything
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 18:40, Justin Mason wrote:
> Ron McKeating said:
>
> > Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
> > ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
> > awarded
> >
> > HTML_50_60 (2.1 points) BODY: Message is 50% to
- Original Message -
From: "Ron McKeating" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 5:18 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Advice Please
> Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
> ordinary text. And why does i
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 13:26, Alan Leghart wrote:
> --On Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:18 PM +0100 Ron McKeating
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
> > ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
> > awarded
> "AL" == Alan Leghart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AL> to use different encoding (although, IIRC, it's not base-64 by
AL> default). I tested on one machine on our LAN, and from inside
AL> Excel 2000, select File and Send as email. Voici, base-64 encoded
AL> when it goes out. I'm glad I didn
Ron McKeating said:
> Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
> ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
> awarded
>
> HTML_50_60 (2.1 points) BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
> HTML_MESSAGE (1.1 points) BODY: HTML includ
--On Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:18 PM +0100 Ron McKeating
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
awarded
HTML_50_60 (2.1 points) BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
Quoting Ron McKeating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
> ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
> awarded
[...]
> This really was an innocent user from a local council. What on earth
> could they have set on
Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
awarded
HTML_50_60 (2.1 points) BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
HTML_MESSAGE (1.1 points) BODY: HTML included in message
BASE64_ENC_TEXT(
25 matches
Mail list logo
