On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 18:40, Justin Mason wrote: > Ron McKeating said: > > > Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their > > ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points > > awarded > > > > HTML_50_60 (2.1 points) BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML > > HTML_MESSAGE (1.1 points) BODY: HTML included in message > > BASE64_ENC_TEXT (3.6 points) RAW: Message text disguised using > > base-64 encoding > > MIME_HTML_ONLY (1.2 points) Message only has text/html MIME parts > > > > This really was an innocent user from a local council. What on earth > > could they have set on their mail client to get a score like this? > > They could be using pound signs, and the MUA in question is deciding that > that needs base64 encoding (obviously not the right thing to do, but > there you go.) Any idea what the MUA was? >
Lotus I-Notes is what they said when I spoke to them on the phone. I don't know anything about it, does it do odd things ? > --j. -- Ron McKeating Senior IT Services Specialist Internet Services and Software Solutions Loughborough University 01509 222329 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
