Ron McKeating said: > Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their > ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points > awarded > > HTML_50_60 (2.1 points) BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML > HTML_MESSAGE (1.1 points) BODY: HTML included in message > BASE64_ENC_TEXT (3.6 points) RAW: Message text disguised using > base-64 encoding > MIME_HTML_ONLY (1.2 points) Message only has text/html MIME parts > > This really was an innocent user from a local council. What on earth > could they have set on their mail client to get a score like this?
They could be using pound signs, and the MUA in question is deciding that that needs base64 encoding (obviously not the right thing to do, but there you go.) Any idea what the MUA was? --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
