--On Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:18 PM +0100 Ron McKeating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
awarded

HTML_50_60         (2.1 points)  BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
HTML_MESSAGE       (1.1 points)  BODY: HTML included in message
BASE64_ENC_TEXT    (3.6 points)  RAW: Message text disguised using
base-64 encoding
MIME_HTML_ONLY     (1.2 points)  Message only has text/html MIME parts

This really was an innocent user from a local council. What on earth
could they have set on their mail client to get a score like this?

Ron

On some bad advice, I set up a rule on my MTA to copy all base-64 encoded emails into a spam folder and delete them from the delivery queue. Slightly more than half of the message caught were spam. Almost half were email from/to corporate employees who were using MS-Excel and Outlook to email spreadsheets to each other. As well, I believe you can force Outlook to use different encoding (although, IIRC, it's not base-64 by default). I tested on one machine on our LAN, and from inside Excel 2000, select File and Send as email. Voici, base-64 encoded when it goes out. I'm glad I didn't follow the advice to _delete_ all base-64 encoded emails. I'm glad I was testing the rule first by quarantine.


HTH,
Alan


------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to