through a spell check and them test the percentage of errors.
-joe
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic cha
Hi Bob:
Bob Apthorpe wrote:
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 22:47:39 -0500 Joe Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't believe the core development team will be too receptive to this,
based on what I remember from the the last time this was brought up on
SAdev. I'm counting on be
in-line into SpamAssassin. I think it would be difficult to add this to
the GA scores, as it is a function of the size, quality, and diversity
of your spam/real corpus. You might be able to accomplish something
similar by increasing the Bayesian weighting on the internal filter.
Enjoy
--
Joe La
;s but I don't see how to control
how, when , and where spamassassin logs what it's doing.
Thanks,
Joe Kendall
IT Manager
Professional Photographers of America
(404) 522-8600 x273
PPA - Business first, creativity foremost and excellence always.
-
e up and have
been using Procmail alone, until time permits further research, tuning, and
testing.
In any regard, I hope sharing my experience helps.
Best 'net regards,
Joe
On Thursday 25 December 2003 01:57 am, Kevin Wormington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been performance testing with a
files and then get the user to trim them.
23 0 * * * /usr/bin/find /usr/home -name caughtspam -size +1000c -ls
I'm new to the list so I don't know if this issue has been dealt with
before.
-Joe
--
====
Joe Hamelin [
This message wasn't tagged by any porn rules. Looking at the rules, it
doesn't look like this is porn, hehe. I understand that someone is
working on enhancing the porn filter, so maybe this might help. If the
header's look a bit funny, it's because I'm pulling my yahoo email into
my own mail server
Check the link in my sig. There is a link to Matt's guide and the
wiki. What
you are looking for is called META rules.
Thank you again..
would have never thought they would be called 'meta rules' :)
---
Joe Topjian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:
and only have it work for the DOMAIN rule?
If not, does anyone out there have a custom ruleset for porn that I
could tag on to DOMAIN rule?
thanks
---
Joe Topjian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://zaven.us
---
This SF.net email is
://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm
great!
lots of info there :)
---
Joe Topjian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://zaven.us
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more
oming in from
aol? Instead of whitelisting them, maybe take away 3 points then beef
up some other rules like the fake_helo_aol or rcvd_in_dynablock
Any help, pointers, or redirects to custom rules would be greatly
appreciated!
Thanks
---
Joe Topjian
email: [EMAIL P
sin/BayesStore.pm line 1281.
Only about 75% of spam is being caught at level 6 tolerance, could this be
the reason? Any ideas how to fix this?
Thanks,
Joe
_
Frustrated with dial-up? Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month
(depending on
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 16:46, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:12:46PM +0100, Brian Morrison wrote:
> > Built this from .spec file, updated the rpms, identifies as 2.60-rc4
> > AFAICS.
> >
> > Slip up,or maybe I'm still running rc4 and the rpm -U failed?
>
> To build the RPM fro
Yeah, must be an installation problem. Without bayes I got:
MONEY_BACK (1.0 points) BODY: Money back guarantee
HTML_FONT_COLOR_UNSAFE (0.1 points) BODY: HTML font color not within
safe 6x6x6 palette
HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED (0.1 points) BODY: HTML font color is red
HTML_50_60 (0.5 poi
> color me confused as well. Are we talking about a Perl module that needs to be
> installed? If so, which one?
> - --
> Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
> http://doug.hunley.homeip.net && http://www.linux-sxs.org
Perl module. It can be found on CPAN (install
Got this while running sa-learn
debug: Score set 0 chosen.
debug: running in taint mode? no
debug: using "/var/spool/mail/filer/bayesian_database2/sa-learn.cf" for
default rules dir
debug: using "/etc/mail/spamassassin" for site rules dir
debug: using "/root/.spamassassin/user_prefs" for user pr
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 10:32:51AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > What are you doing to call spamc?
>
> Ah, thanks. I found it - was calling "spamc -c -f".
> After removing the "-c", it worked.
>
Thanks I have b
Dear list,
I'm having some problems getting spamc/spamd working on a qmail gateway. I'm wondering
what is the most lightweight way to get mail scanned and then re-injected back into
the qmail-queue? I have qmail patched to work with the QMAILQUEUE variable. If I point
my QMAILQUEUE to spamc noth
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of David B Funk
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 11:48 AM
> To: Joe Julian
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist ignored for auto-learn?
>
>
> On Wed,
I have a list of specific trusted addresses in my whitelist, but it
still won't autolearn from them. Why not? Their scores are quite
negative, way below -2, but it still won't autolearn from them. It looks
like it's ignoring the whitelist when checking whether or not it should
autolearn. What can I
> What "exact" file should I be looking for to create a Whitelist and
> Blacklist
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
or
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs
For example, see
http://maxo.captainnet.net/mailAdmin/spamAssassin/add.html
Joe
l.cf or user_prefs files,
those entries are ignored.
Is there something else I need to do in my program to enable the
whitelist_from options?
Thanks!
Joe
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operat
Title: Message
I have a list of
specific trusted addresses in my whitelist, but it still won't autolearn from
them. Why not? Their scores are quite negative, way below -2, but it still won't
autolearn from them. It looks like it's ignoring the whitelist when checking
whether or not it should
ssassin as
downloaded check against the various blacklists? I can't believe these
chinese ISP's aren't on them.
Thanks
Joe
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on
and quote (\") and feed sample-nonspam.txt back to spamassassin
again , then I get the same PGP_SIGNATURE for tests and a hits number
of -2.9 again.
Any ideas how to deal with these quote marks in the check_message_text()
function?
Joe
--
and then to re-install after
back revving Perl, will leave the OS in an unstable state.
Any ideas?
How are others handling this problem?
Does SpamAssassin (v2.55 and v2.60) seem to be running fine on Perl 5.8?
Joe
---
This SF.Net email sponsor
s
database.
Hope that helps,
Joe
> I just installed SA 2.55, so I am rather new to Bayes. And I
> was wondering whether Bayes learning will work on IMAP
> folders too. The reason I ask is that I started collecting
> mail on a special "spamtrap" account, and, if possible, I&
over
the internet, but I still don't understand how to deal with these
"Mail::SpamAssassin->new()" objects.
Basically, I need to pass the "$input" string from the C program to the Perl
code above and then get the "$output" string back from the Perl code above
to
Joseph Young
Involved.com
System Admin
Thanks for replying. I know spamd is listening, because some email gets
marked as spam. ~10% or ~20% are not. I have spamd enabled with the debug
option. It shows no errors,failures or (0/0).
joe
- Original Message -
From: "Ralf Guen
D] by wezen.involved.com by uid 512 with
qmail-scanner-1.16
(spamassassin: 2.52. Clear:SA:0(0/0):.
Processed in 1.089797 secs); 30 Jun 2003 13:08:26 -
>From this I can tell that qmail-scanner or spamc failed to connect to spamd.
I am sure that spamd has a max amount of connection
D] by wezen.involved.com by uid 512 with
qmail-scanner-1.16
(spamassassin: 2.52. Clear:SA:0(0/0):.
Processed in 1.089797 secs); 30 Jun 2003 13:08:26 -
>From this I can tell that qmail-scanner or spamc failed to connect to spamd.
I am sure that spamd has a max amount of connection
D] by wezen.involved.com by uid 512 with
qmail-scanner-1.16
(spamassassin: 2.52. Clear:SA:0(0/0):.
Processed in 1.089797 secs); 30 Jun 2003 13:08:26 -
>From this I can tell that qmail-scanner or spamc failed to connect to spamd.
I am sure that spamd has a max amount of connection
me machine at the same time
so spamassassin won't get confused or trip over the other messages (or
itself) that are getting processed at the same time?
Thanks!
Joe
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites inc
Hmmm... How much negative score should smileys get... ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Benjamin A. Shelton
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 8:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Yet another stats program, this ti
ust need
something as easy as possible (given the circumstances/restraints) to
develop on so I don't have to have as many servers around me (at home and at
work) to get this done.
Joe
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INet
Hello Everyone,
I need to get Spam Assassin to work on a MS Windows XP machine ASAP.
Are there any docs, faqs , web pages, or "cheat sheets" available to help me
get this does ASAP?
Thanks!
Joe
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored
Heh, didn't take David long...
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of David F. Skoll
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Mimedefang] Notice: Dropping support for RAV AntiVirus
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Just
Received: from marge (ppp025.pfa.centurytel.net [207.230.201.227])
by r2d2.centurytel.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id
h541GkPB015914
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 3 Jun 2003
20:16:53 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Marge Golomb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PR
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 15:27, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Louis Bohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I am doing about 20k messages a day (inbound from the internet) on two
> > Sun Netra T1's (1 gig ram, 440 mHz single cpu, mirrored 18 gig drives).
> > For software I am using Sendmail, MimeDefang and SA
ike "bad words".
I am not very good with regular expressions, co I am unsure how to filter
these tags out so that SA can see and test against the text. Any
suggestions are, of course, welcome.
tia, Joe D
---
This SF.net email is sp
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Hannu Liljemark wrote:
> > In the course of my research, I've become aware of the fact that
> > Wanadoo was in a lot of hot water about 18 months ago because the
> > wanadoo.fr domain was being used as the origin of a lot of hack
> > attacks and spam. The company seemed unre
> > Just a thought, why not run SA on the delivery host instead of the MX
> > hosts? (I'm assume that both of your MX servers must forward the mail to a
> > central server.)
> Your suggestion is the exact opposite of the intended function. The idea
> is to run two relays to share the load, or r
For some reason, emails sent from *.teledailypromotionslist1090009.com
or *.teledaily1234promotions430349list1090009.com don't raise the
FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS flag. Does the FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS check the entire
FROM header or just the userid that precedes the @ symbol?
e .spamassassin/user_prefs file but can not find a good example to work
from. Is this designed to be used only at the MT level or can someone point
me in the right direction to configure this at a user level?
thank you!
- JoeB
--
Joe Beiter &l
Friday, November 15, 2002, 8:37:52 AM, you wrote:
TVD> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:34:15PM -0500, Joe Berry wrote:
>> Thought you might all be interested in seeing a rather good Nigerian
>> spam email. It's even "customized" with my name in it (except the
>
Thought you might all be interested in seeing a rather good Nigerian
spam email. It's even "customized" with my name in it (except the
"Mr." is missing). The spelling errors though spoiled it a bit. I
can't imagine a British barrister having such poor English :-).
lays, since they only have to send one message and the list does
> the spamming for them.
Exactly.
----
Joe Sotham
Christianity got over the difficulty of furious opposites
by keeping th
ell-designed for this kind of mail profile.
--------
Joe Sotham
Christianity got over the difficulty of furious opposites
by keeping them both and keeping them furiou
388]: connect() to spamd failed:
> Connection refused
>
> I can't figure out what causes that.. Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> -Neal.
Is spamd running?
--
Joe
-
We have been silent witnesses of evil d
wfav_pearls.gif"; ALT="Find New
Favorites" WIDTH="120" HEIGHT="60" BORDER="0"> http://clickthru.comics.com:81/Click?q=f5-lTqRQgwu2EaVoup6D1kVwSaBmRRR";>http://www.comics.com/images/comicsmail/ecard_icon.gif"; ALT="Free E-cards
OM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.42
[snip ...body]
--------
Joe
-
We have been silent witnesses of evil deeds...
Will our inward power of
eferencing the SA config
option razor_config. I think that's exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks,
Joe
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
__
file in /etc/razor (where my conf file was to be found).
Now I see no activity whatsoever. It is my understanding that SA
automatically calls razor.
Here's a copy of my current procmailrc file:
:0fw
* < 256000
|spamc
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
/home/joe/spamassassin-caught
I am inde
After installing SpamAssassin, when I use the cpan r command,
I get the error below. I have not edited Conf.pm.
cpan shell -- CPAN exploration and modules installation (v1.63)
ReadLine support enabled
cpan> r
Going to read /root/.cpan/sources/authors/01mailrc.txt.gz
CPAN: Compress::Zlib loaded o
lly though, randomly (or so it
seems) several e-mails seem concatenated into a single e-mail.
Am I doing something wrong? Any help/feedback is appreciated.
Running FreeBSD 4.4 RELEASE, sendmail 8.12.2, SA 2.11.
Thanks,
Joe
======
Joe Nave
NetMeister, Inc.
In
l (m4 &
filter?)?
Thanks in advance,
Joe
======
Joe Nave
NetMeister, Inc.
InterNetwork Design & Integration
1146 N. Central Avenue #112
Glendale, CA 91202
818-247-5340 Fax 818-247-5073
[EM
ripts, 90.91% okay. 14/152 subtests failed, 90.79% okay.
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 29
/usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK
Running make install
make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
--- end snip ---
Best Regards,
Joe
--
Joe Tan
[EMAIL PROTECTED
57 matches
Mail list logo