[SAtalk] Checking for spelling errors

2004-01-13 Thread Joe Croft
through a spell check and them test the percentage of errors. -joe --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic cha

Re: [SAtalk] Integrating additional spam filters into SpamAssassin

2004-01-01 Thread Joe Landman
Hi Bob: Bob Apthorpe wrote: On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 22:47:39 -0500 Joe Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't believe the core development team will be too receptive to this, based on what I remember from the the last time this was brought up on SAdev. I'm counting on be

[SAtalk] Integrating additional spam filters into SpamAssassin

2004-01-01 Thread Joe Landman
in-line into SpamAssassin. I think it would be difficult to add this to the GA scores, as it is a function of the size, quality, and diversity of your spam/real corpus. You might be able to accomplish something similar by increasing the Bayesian weighting on the internal filter. Enjoy -- Joe La

[SAtalk] How to turn on logging

2003-12-31 Thread Kendall, Joe (PPA)
;s but I don't see how to control how, when , and where spamassassin logs what it's doing. Thanks, Joe Kendall IT Manager Professional Photographers of America (404) 522-8600 x273 PPA - Business first, creativity foremost and excellence always. -

Re: [SAtalk] SA performance tuning

2003-12-30 Thread Joe Rinehart
e up and have been using Procmail alone, until time permits further research, tuning, and testing. In any regard, I hope sharing my experience helps. Best 'net regards, Joe On Thursday 25 December 2003 01:57 am, Kevin Wormington wrote: > Hi, > > I have been performance testing with a

Re: [SAtalk] hundreds of spamd processes spawning

2003-12-30 Thread Joe Hamelin
files and then get the user to trim them. 23 0 * * * /usr/bin/find /usr/home -name caughtspam -size +1000c -ls I'm new to the list so I don't know if this issue has been dealt with before. -Joe -- ==== Joe Hamelin [

[SAtalk] This isn't Porn???

2003-10-30 Thread Joe Julian
This message wasn't tagged by any porn rules. Looking at the rules, it doesn't look like this is porn, hehe. I understand that someone is working on enhancing the porn filter, so maybe this might help. If the header's look a bit funny, it's because I'm pulling my yahoo email into my own mail server

Re: [SAtalk] grouping rules

2003-10-29 Thread Joe
Check the link in my sig. There is a link to Matt's guide and the wiki. What you are looking for is called META rules. Thank you again.. would have never thought they would be called 'meta rules' :) --- Joe Topjian email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web:

[SAtalk] grouping rules

2003-10-29 Thread Joe
and only have it work for the DOMAIN rule? If not, does anyone out there have a custom ruleset for porn that I could tag on to DOMAIN rule? thanks --- Joe Topjian email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://zaven.us --- This SF.net email is

Re: [SAtalk] problems with aol

2003-10-28 Thread Joe
://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm great! lots of info there :) --- Joe Topjian email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://zaven.us --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more

[SAtalk] problems with aol

2003-10-28 Thread Joe
oming in from aol? Instead of whitelisting them, maybe take away 3 points then beef up some other rules like the fake_helo_aol or rcvd_in_dynablock Any help, pointers, or redirects to custom rules would be greatly appreciated! Thanks --- Joe Topjian email: [EMAIL P

[SAtalk] Can't Get Bayes Working in 2.60

2003-09-28 Thread Joe Finkle
sin/BayesStore.pm line 1281. Only about 75% of spam is being caught at level 6 tolerance, could this be the reason? Any ideas how to fix this? Thanks, Joe _ Frustrated with dial-up? Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month (depending on

Re: [SAtalk] [SAdev] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc5 released

2003-09-18 Thread Joe Breu
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 16:46, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:12:46PM +0100, Brian Morrison wrote: > > Built this from .spec file, updated the rpms, identifies as 2.60-rc4 > > AFAICS. > > > > Slip up,or maybe I'm still running rc4 and the rpm -U failed? > > To build the RPM fro

RE: [SAtalk] Spam with score of 0.0

2003-09-09 Thread Joe Julian
Yeah, must be an installation problem. Without bayes I got: MONEY_BACK (1.0 points) BODY: Money back guarantee HTML_FONT_COLOR_UNSAFE (0.1 points) BODY: HTML font color not within safe 6x6x6 palette HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED (0.1 points) BODY: HTML font color is red HTML_50_60 (0.5 poi

Re: [SAtalk] Re: heads-up: 2.60 will drop support for bayes dbs innon-DB_File formats

2003-08-28 Thread Joe Breu
> color me confused as well. Are we talking about a Perl module that needs to be > installed? If so, which one? > - -- > Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 > http://doug.hunley.homeip.net && http://www.linux-sxs.org Perl module. It can be found on CPAN (install

[SAtalk] sa-learn and 'gibberish entry found'

2003-08-28 Thread Joe Breu
Got this while running sa-learn debug: Score set 0 chosen. debug: running in taint mode? no debug: using "/var/spool/mail/filer/bayesian_database2/sa-learn.cf" for default rules dir debug: using "/etc/mail/spamassassin" for site rules dir debug: using "/root/.spamassassin/user_prefs" for user pr

FW: [SAtalk] No X-Spam-Report header line?!

2003-08-26 Thread Joe Ruddy
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 10:32:51AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > > What are you doing to call spamc? > > Ah, thanks. I found it - was calling "spamc -c -f". > After removing the "-c", it worked. > Thanks I have b

[SAtalk] spamc/spamd question on a qmail gateway

2003-08-23 Thread Joe Cave
Dear list, I'm having some problems getting spamc/spamd working on a qmail gateway. I'm wondering what is the most lightweight way to get mail scanned and then re-injected back into the qmail-queue? I have qmail patched to work with the QMAILQUEUE variable. If I point my QMAILQUEUE to spamc noth

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist ignored for auto-learn?

2003-07-24 Thread Joe Julian
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of David B Funk > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 11:48 AM > To: Joe Julian > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist ignored for auto-learn? > > > On Wed,

[SAtalk] Whitelist ignored for auto-learn?

2003-07-23 Thread Joe Julian
I have a list of specific trusted addresses in my whitelist, but it still won't autolearn from them. Why not? Their scores are quite negative, way below -2, but it still won't autolearn from them. It looks like it's ignoring the whitelist when checking whether or not it should autolearn. What can I

Re: [SAtalk] Blacklist & Whitelist file help

2003-07-18 Thread Joe Flowers
> What "exact" file should I be looking for to create a Whitelist and > Blacklist /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf or ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs For example, see http://maxo.captainnet.net/mailAdmin/spamAssassin/add.html Joe

[SAtalk] whitelist_from not working :-(

2003-07-18 Thread Joe Flowers
l.cf or user_prefs files, those entries are ignored. Is there something else I need to do in my program to enable the whitelist_from options? Thanks! Joe --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operat

[SAtalk] Why won't this auto-learn?

2003-07-17 Thread Joe Julian
Title: Message I have a list of specific trusted addresses in my whitelist, but it still won't autolearn from them. Why not? Their scores are quite negative, way below -2, but it still won't autolearn from them. It looks like it's ignoring the whitelist when checking whether or not it should

[SAtalk] China

2003-07-17 Thread Joe Nicholson
ssassin as downloaded check against the various blacklists? I can't believe these chinese ISP's aren't on them. Thanks Joe --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on

[SAtalk] Quote (") marks in check_message_text() causing trouble

2003-07-13 Thread Joe Flowers
and quote (\") and feed sample-nonspam.txt back to spamassassin again , then I get the same PGP_SIGNATURE for tests and a hits number of -2.9 again. Any ideas how to deal with these quote marks in the check_message_text() function? Joe --

[SAtalk] Adding Perl 5.6.1 to RH Linux 9 that already has Perl 5.8 installed.

2003-07-10 Thread Joe Flowers
and then to re-install after back revving Perl, will leave the OS in an unstable state. Any ideas? How are others handling this problem? Does SpamAssassin (v2.55 and v2.60) seem to be running fine on Perl 5.8? Joe --- This SF.Net email sponsor

RE: [SAtalk] Bayes and IMAP

2003-07-07 Thread Joe Julian
s database. Hope that helps, Joe > I just installed SA 2.55, so I am rather new to Bayes. And I > was wondering whether Bayes learning will work on IMAP > folders too. The reason I ask is that I started collecting > mail on a special "spamtrap" account, and, if possible, I&

[SAtalk] Embedding Perl (Mail::SpamAssassin) in a C program

2003-07-07 Thread Joe Flowers
over the internet, but I still don't understand how to deal with these "Mail::SpamAssassin->new()" objects. Basically, I need to pass the "$input" string from the C program to the Perl code above and then get the "$output" string back from the Perl code above to

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail-scanner

2003-07-01 Thread Joe Young
Joseph Young Involved.com System Admin Thanks for replying. I know spamd is listening, because some email gets marked as spam. ~10% or ~20% are not. I have spamd enabled with the debug option. It shows no errors,failures or (0/0). joe - Original Message - From: "Ralf Guen

[SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail-scanner

2003-07-01 Thread Joe Young
D] by wezen.involved.com by uid 512 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 2.52. Clear:SA:0(0/0):. Processed in 1.089797 secs); 30 Jun 2003 13:08:26 - >From this I can tell that qmail-scanner or spamc failed to connect to spamd. I am sure that spamd has a max amount of connection

[SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail-scanner

2003-07-01 Thread Joe Young
D] by wezen.involved.com by uid 512 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 2.52. Clear:SA:0(0/0):. Processed in 1.089797 secs); 30 Jun 2003 13:08:26 - >From this I can tell that qmail-scanner or spamc failed to connect to spamd. I am sure that spamd has a max amount of connection

[SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail-scanner

2003-06-30 Thread Joe Young
D] by wezen.involved.com by uid 512 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 2.52. Clear:SA:0(0/0):. Processed in 1.089797 secs); 30 Jun 2003 13:08:26 - >From this I can tell that qmail-scanner or spamc failed to connect to spamd. I am sure that spamd has a max amount of connection

[SAtalk] Wrapping spamassassin in a multi-threaded C program?

2003-06-30 Thread Joe Flowers
me machine at the same time so spamassassin won't get confused or trip over the other messages (or itself) that are getting processed at the same time? Thanks! Joe --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites inc

RE: [SAtalk] Yet another stats program, this time with RRDtool graphs

2003-06-17 Thread Joe Julian
Hmmm... How much negative score should smileys get... ;) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Benjamin A. Shelton > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 8:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Yet another stats program, this ti

Re: [SAtalk] Docs or "cheat sheets" on installing SpamAssassin on MS Windows?

2003-06-17 Thread Joe Flowers
ust need something as easy as possible (given the circumstances/restraints) to develop on so I don't have to have as many servers around me (at home and at work) to get this done. Joe --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INet

[SAtalk] Docs or "cheat sheets" on installing SpamAssassin on MS Windows?

2003-06-16 Thread Joe Flowers
Hello Everyone, I need to get Spam Assassin to work on a MS Windows XP machine ASAP. Are there any docs, faqs , web pages, or "cheat sheets" available to help me get this does ASAP? Thanks! Joe --- This SF.Net email is sponsored

RE: [SAtalk] Really OT: Microsoft buys out RAV

2003-06-10 Thread Joe Julian
Heh, didn't take David long... > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of David F. Skoll > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Mimedefang] Notice: Dropping support for RAV AntiVirus > > > Hi, > > Just

RE: [SAtalk] "Marge Golomb's" go away post (was no subject)

2003-06-05 Thread Joe Julian
Received: from marge (ppp025.pfa.centurytel.net [207.230.201.227]) by r2d2.centurytel.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h541GkPB015914 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 20:16:53 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Marge Golomb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PR

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin on a high load mail system

2003-06-04 Thread Joe Breu
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 15:27, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Louis Bohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I am doing about 20k messages a day (inbound from the internet) on two > > Sun Netra T1's (1 gig ram, 440 mHz single cpu, mirrored 18 gig drives). > > For software I am using Sendmail, MimeDefang and SA

[SAtalk] sneaky spam - new user

2003-05-31 Thread joe
ike "bad words". I am not very good with regular expressions, co I am unsure how to filter these tags out so that SA can see and test against the text. Any suggestions are, of course, welcome. tia, Joe D --- This SF.net email is sp

Re: [SAtalk] looking for feedback on Wanadoo

2003-05-30 Thread Joe Julian
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Hannu Liljemark wrote: > > In the course of my research, I've become aware of the fact that > > Wanadoo was in a lot of hot water about 18 months ago because the > > wanadoo.fr domain was being used as the origin of a lot of hack > > attacks and spam. The company seemed unre

Re: [SAtalk] sharing Bayes DB between relays

2003-05-30 Thread Joe Breu
> > Just a thought, why not run SA on the delivery host instead of the MX > > hosts? (I'm assume that both of your MX servers must forward the mail to a > > central server.) > Your suggestion is the exact opposite of the intended function. The idea > is to run two relays to share the load, or r

[SAtalk] Test on Hostname having nmbers mixed in with letters

2002-12-04 Thread Joe Termine
For some reason, emails sent from *.teledailypromotionslist1090009.com or *.teledaily1234promotions430349list1090009.com don't raise the FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS flag. Does the FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS check the entire FROM header or just the userid that precedes the @ symbol?

[SAtalk] newb user looking for user_prefs help

2002-11-25 Thread Joe Beiter
e .spamassassin/user_prefs file but can not find a good example to work from. Is this designed to be used only at the MT level or can someone point me in the right direction to configure this at a user level? thank you! - JoeB -- Joe Beiter &l

Re[2]: [SAtalk] New, rather good variation on Nigerian spam

2002-11-15 Thread Joe Berry
Friday, November 15, 2002, 8:37:52 AM, you wrote: TVD> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:34:15PM -0500, Joe Berry wrote: >> Thought you might all be interested in seeing a rather good Nigerian >> spam email. It's even "customized" with my name in it (except the >

[SAtalk] New, rather good variation on Nigerian spam

2002-11-14 Thread Joe Berry
Thought you might all be interested in seeing a rather good Nigerian spam email. It's even "customized" with my name in it (except the "Mr." is missing). The spelling errors though spoiled it a bit. I can't imagine a British barrister having such poor English :-).

Re: [SAtalk] AWL problem ...

2002-10-22 Thread joe
lays, since they only have to send one message and the list does > the spamming for them. Exactly. ---- Joe Sotham Christianity got over the difficulty of furious opposites by keeping th

Re: [SAtalk] AWL problem ...

2002-10-22 Thread joe
ell-designed for this kind of mail profile. -------- Joe Sotham Christianity got over the difficulty of furious opposites by keeping them both and keeping them furiou

Re: [SAtalk] spamd connection refused.

2002-10-16 Thread joe
388]: connect() to spamd failed: > Connection refused > > I can't figure out what causes that.. Any ideas? > > Thanks, > -Neal. Is spamd running? -- Joe - We have been silent witnesses of evil d

[SAtalk] Why doesn't whilelist catch this?

2002-10-12 Thread Joe Berry
wfav_pearls.gif"; ALT="Find New Favorites" WIDTH="120" HEIGHT="60" BORDER="0">  http://clickthru.comics.com:81/Click?q=f5-lTqRQgwu2EaVoup6D1kVwSaBmRRR";>http://www.comics.com/images/comicsmail/ecard_icon.gif"; ALT="Free E-cards

[SAtalk] Probably trivial & unimportant but driving me crazy

2002-10-07 Thread joe-dated-1034609318 . a6d470
OM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.42 [snip ...body] -------- Joe - We have been silent witnesses of evil deeds... Will our inward power of

Re: [SAtalk] Proper procmailrc for SA and Razor

2002-10-06 Thread Joe Berry
eferencing the SA config option razor_config. I think that's exactly what I was looking for. Thanks, Joe --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf __

[SAtalk] Proper procmailrc for SA and Razor

2002-10-06 Thread Joe Berry
file in /etc/razor (where my conf file was to be found). Now I see no activity whatsoever. It is my understanding that SA automatically calls razor. Here's a copy of my current procmailrc file: :0fw * < 256000 |spamc :0: * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes /home/joe/spamassassin-caught I am inde

[SAtalk] cpan r command

2002-10-01 Thread Joe Nall
After installing SpamAssassin, when I use the cpan r command, I get the error below. I have not edited Conf.pm. cpan shell -- CPAN exploration and modules installation (v1.63) ReadLine support enabled cpan> r Going to read /root/.cpan/sources/authors/01mailrc.txt.gz CPAN: Compress::Zlib loaded o

[SAtalk] Newbie - Weird problem

2002-04-17 Thread Joe Nave
lly though, randomly (or so it seems) several e-mails seem concatenated into a single e-mail. Am I doing something wrong? Any help/feedback is appreciated. Running FreeBSD 4.4 RELEASE, sendmail 8.12.2, SA 2.11. Thanks, Joe ====== Joe Nave NetMeister, Inc. In

[SAtalk] sendmail & SA - Newbie Questions

2002-04-06 Thread Joe Nave
l (m4 & filter?)? Thanks in advance, Joe ====== Joe Nave NetMeister, Inc. InterNetwork Design & Integration 1146 N. Central Avenue #112 Glendale, CA 91202 818-247-5340 Fax 818-247-5073 [EM

[SAtalk] Installation problems

2002-02-19 Thread Joe Tan
ripts, 90.91% okay. 14/152 subtests failed, 90.79% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 29 /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK Running make install make test had returned bad status, won't install without force --- end snip --- Best Regards, Joe -- Joe Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED