> > Just a thought, why not run SA on the delivery host instead of the MX > > hosts? (I'm assume that both of your MX servers must forward the mail to a > > central server.)
> Your suggestion is the exact opposite of the intended function. The idea > is to run two relays to share the load, or run as primary/secondary (MX), > filter via SA, then deliver to the main mail server. You are proposing to > dump the work back onto an already-overloaded main server, and remove the > two "helpers" doing the filtering. Doesn't make sense to me. YMMV. --Alan And in my case, completely impratical. We use a cluster of machines to handle mail. 2 mail exchangers and 2 customer smtp/pop3/imap servers. All 4 machines have access to the same mail spool using maildir (no locking problem there). We do filtering on all machines (all scan for infections and spam). A central bayes DB is the best solution. All machines benefit from the ham and spam learned from other machines. -- Thanks, --------------------------------------------------------- Joseph W. Breu, CCNA phone : +1.319.268.5228 Senior Network Administrator fax : +1.319.266.8158 Cedar Falls Utilities cell : +1.319.493.1686 support: +1.319.268.5221 url : http://www.cfu.net ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
