On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:18:06PM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> these are all mails that get learned about 30 days after being stored on
> the system. Basically people have 30 days to clean up their mail.. if
> not a FP, then we learn it as spam. So all learned mail is about 30
> days old to the
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:55:06AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> any advice on how to force an expire successfully here?
You can't force an expiry, you can only force an expiry attempt.
> I am running 2.60 on solaris 9.
I would first recommend upgrading to 2.63, then try again. You'll still
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 01:32:11PM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> hmm that is wierd b/c i learned about 500 a nite or so for the last 3 to
> 4 weeks...
were these mails recently sent or old mails that you're learning on now?
> sigh.. does this mean corruption in the DB ?
It could, but I doubt
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 12:27:53PM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> debug: bayes: expiry check keep size, 75% of max: 75
> debug: bayes: token count: 2203679, final goal reduction size: 1453679
> debug: bayes: First pass? Current: 1075482160, Last: 1075479068, atime:
> 1382400, count: 1019, newd
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 12:31:10PM -0500, Philip Mak wrote:
> Warning: I could not locate your pod2man program. Please make sure,
> your pod2man program is in your PATH before you execute 'make'
I really wish people would read the FAQ before posting questions...
http://wiki.spamassassin.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 08:56:54AM -0800, Evan Platt wrote:
> I think we need a FAQ entry for this - this is covered QUITE often.
You mean such as: http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/StatusRounding
:)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Software is like sex; it's better when it's free." - Linus Torva
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:18:45AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> Thanks Theo i will try that. Any idea why these tokens wont expire
> though? I learn a lot of spam each day and still nothing and my DB just
> keeps getting bigger and bigger.
Not without that extra debug output. :P
The problem i
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 11:17:15AM -0500, Robb Bryn wrote:
> Is there anyway to clear all the HAM for Bayes and retrain it without
> loosing all the SPAM?
If you have all the messages you've learned from, you could loop over
each one and do a "sa-learn --forget".
Otherwise, no.
--
Randomly Gene
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 03:01:46PM +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
> RH9 with exim-4.30
> make gives: Makefile:74: *** missing separator. Stop.
First guess: http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/MakeMissingSeparator
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Euler's Identity ... the Sine/Cosine thing..." - Ins
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:56:39PM +, thomas fritz wrote:
> debug: bayes: expiry check keep size, 75% of max: 112500
> debug: bayes: token count: 1215351, final goal reduction size: 1102851
Ok, so you want to keep 112k, and have 1.2m, for a reduction size of 1.1m.
> debug: bayes: atime to
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 12:53:27AM -0500, Scott Lambert wrote:
> The attached message sent through spamcop has tripped the
> FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA. Maybe it needs to be looked at?
I would say bad behavior by spamcop. They added:
X-Mailer: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/10
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 10:25:20PM -0500, Rick Mallett wrote:
> The issue is that bayes expiry is broken under some circumstances
> as evidenced by this listing of my bayes database area, possibly
> because its taking more than 10 minutes, or possibly because there
> is a bug in the code
Well, you
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:57:56PM +, David Lee wrote:
> The MailScanner maintainer, Julian Field, is very responsive, and he has
> already coded up an alternative way of driving SA from MS, so that its use
> of SA can avoid auto-expire (and thereby avoid the possible multiple
> simultaneous ex
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 03:32:39PM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Just wanted to find out if verson 2.63 inserts lines into message
> body of messages it sees as spam. Currently using 2.60 which does do
> that.
No 2.6x version will insert lines into the message body (no 2.5x
version either). You
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 04:05:49PM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> >From what I have read, we don't meed to move up on perl (perl5.8x) until
> SA-2.70 is released.
2.70 (which is actually going to be 3.0.0) only requires 5.6.1, not 5.8.x. FYI.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"And the next time you
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 09:39:27AM -0700, Joshua Thornburg wrote:
> error: Failed dependencies:
> perl(Digest::SHA1) is needed by spamassassin-tools-2.63-1
>
> I added Digest::SHA1 via perl -MCPAN -e shell and it took with no problems.
> But I still get the same dependency error. Any sugg
SpamAssassin is a mail filter which uses advanced statistical
and heuristic tests to identify spam (also known as unsolicited
commercial/bulk email).
Downloading
---
Pick it up from:
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.63.tar.gz
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:55:58AM -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> Any idea when we'll get RPMs available for the new release?
I made them available today: http://www.spamassassin.org/released/RPMs/ :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
And in the limiting case where the optimizer is completely broke
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 11:07:13AM -0600, Bob Apthorpe wrote:
> It's (usually) not difficult to build your own. This initial directory
> is for SuSE; Red Hat hides their build tree elsewhere, like
> /usr/src/redhat:
Yeah. I put one up though, it ought to get out to the released area
in the next
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:44:03AM -0600, Shannon Werb wrote:
> Hi Thanks, I am running:
> This is perl, version 5.005_03 built for i386-freebsd
>
> Will the known issue be resolved in a future release or should I consider
> upgrading?
Yes, we'll be releasing 2.63 in the next day or two
specifica
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 09:30:53AM +, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> F/FE/FELICITY/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.62.tar.gz
> where as the 2.61 and previous show..
> J/JM/JMASON/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.61.tar.gz
>
> has the author changed then?
I now have comaintainer status on CPAN to upload new versions. It us
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 05:19:46AM -0500, Pedro Sam wrote:
> I ran into the same problem, and was unable to find any documentation ... but
> here is my guess of what the columns mean:
yeah, the dumps weren't meant for general viewing (more of a debug thing),
so they're not very verbose.
> 0.995
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 07:06:42AM -0600, Shannon Werb wrote:
> Which of these should I focus on fixing, different from 2.61 requirements?
What version of perl are you running? If it's 5.005, there's a known issue.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
linux: because a PC is a terrible thing to waste
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 09:13:23PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote:
> You'll be happy to know that I just rebuilt SA from 5.6.1 and
> everything works without hacking stuff up. I guess nobody will be
> around to debug for 5.005 anymore!
:)
> Just one other question...do I have to rebuild pyzor and
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 01:26:59PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote:
> So should I just comment out the line or should I wait from a fix?
Comment out the line.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
I bet Einstein turned himself all sorts of colors before he invented the
lightbulb.
-- Home
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 01:16:26PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote:
> Anyone else seeing problems like this when they start 2.62
>
> [12:39:50 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /home/mike]# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/spamass.sh
> start Can't use subscript on split at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAs
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 08:06:47PM -0500, Pedro Sam wrote:
> I keep on reading these concerned postings on so-called "bayes-posion" ... My
> personal experience is that *NONE* of these had managed to get through my
> well trained bayes database.
There was an excellent presentation by John Graham
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 04:39:00PM -0800, Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
> Hey Theo - does this fix this bug as well?
>
> Don't see it updated in the bug list, so thought I'd check.
>
> http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2906
Nope, that's a 2.70 milestone bug currently.
BTW: please don't
SpamAssassin is a mail filter which uses advanced statistical
and heuristic tests to identify spam (also known as unsolicited
commercial/bulk email).
Downloading
---
Pick it up from:
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.62.tar.gz
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 11:58:52PM +0100, Quinn Comendant wrote:
> 1. Is it possible to run sa-learn to update all DBs en masse?
as root "su - -c 'sa-learn ...'" ?
> 2. Or should I simply upgrade to 2.61 and ignore the --import and --
> rebuild instructions. I assume this will delete all user's B
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 08:41:58PM -, Alan Munday wrote:
> Just had the mail below trigger on:
>
> 2.0 MY_HTTP_ODD_PORT URI: Link to a server on nonstandard port
>
> Why Vailresorts would want to go to the effort of declaring port 80 in their
> link is a mystery.
>
> However it is cle
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 11:25:25AM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >Hey does anyone know if there are any spamassassin books comming out?
>
> None that I'm aware of.
There's 1 that I've heard about, but at last check they're still in the
outlining stage.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
I didn't wan
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 08:32:03PM +1300, Scott Truman wrote:
> -rw-r--r--1 exim exim 1757 Jan 15 15:23 bayes_msgcount
> -rw-r--r--1 exim exim 4096 Jan 15 15:23 bayes_seen.dir
> -rw-r--r--1 exim exim 7878656 Jan 15 15:23 bayes_seen.pag
> -rw-r--r--1
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:02:35PM +1300, Scott Truman wrote:
> Sheesh...how do I know what was 'running' on the other box or atleast
> what SpamAssassin was using?
You could do "file bayes_toks" and see what comes back. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
We question most of the mantras around he
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:46:26PM +1300, Scott Truman wrote:
> The new server is running Redhat ES3.0 and I had to install the DB_File
> perl module. Do I need anything else?
It depends. If you used DB_File on the old box, you can probably get
away with running the appropriate db_update then let
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:57:13PM -0500, John Ruttenberg wrote:
> 1. Licensed mail sender has private pgp/gpg key provided by Habeas and
>uses it to sign outgoing mail. (Also adds haiku for legal purposes.)
I think you've just outlined the Verisign method of "stamping out spam".
At l
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 02:27:59PM -0500, Kevin Old wrote:
> I hear ya. Shame on me. How dare someone have an actual question that
> needed clearing up and after searching the archives still didn't find a
> suitable answer to their question. Why don't we just close down this
> list so we can all
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 01:55:43PM -0500, Kevin Old wrote:
> I have had a lot of the Habeas messages also and have reported them, but
> am extremely confused at the actual point of Habeas?
Ok, I'm getting tired of these types of messages. Habeas' business model
is not SA related, so please stop p
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:26:46AM -0500, Jack Gostl wrote:
> I sometimes wonder if the whole system wouldn't be smaller and stabler if
> it were entirely Bayes based.
Well, sure it would be. But frankly, if you want Bayes only, there
are several other projects out there to look at... SpamBayes,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:20:42AM -0500, Gerry Doris wrote:
> I just sent my copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it bounced. I personally
> think it was a REALLY bad idea to include these jokers in the scoring.
That's because it's habeas (note the "a", not a "u").
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Ph
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 05:26:16PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Send them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I dug through my spam corpus and found
> 8 so far this month and just sent them off. We'll see what happens.
BTW: I just found a bunch more today (to different spamtraps)... All of
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 05:18:30PM -0500, Jack Gostl wrote:
> Just got a bunch of these myself. Are you suggesting that we simply
> learn them as spam and ignore them otherwise and then let nature take its
> course? Or should I foward this stuff someplace.
Send them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I dug thr
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 10:03:09PM -, Andrew Cranson wrote:
> Any idea if this is being implemented in an upcoming release? I know
Since SA can _ONLY_ tag mails, it will never be able to delete messages.
If you want this functionality, you can have whatever calls SA to parse
the headers and de
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 03:14:37PM -0600, David A. Carter wrote:
> the message differ from the original, I figured I better --forget the
> original first. Was this not needed? Did I even need to remove the habeas
> marks first?
If you learn a message that has already been learned as the opposite
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:27:40PM +0100, Michael Jacob wrote:
> This is the first access to the new database. And then I found a
> leftover and damaged "_toks.new" database lying around in
> ~/.spamassassin. Seems there is a sanity check missing. I added this
> near the beginning of this sub:
Ple
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 01:53:48PM -0600, David A. Carter wrote:
> it down so low that it was autolearned as ham. To fix, I ran sa-learn
> --forget over the message and then re-learned it as spam, removing the
you can just learn it as spam, it'll auto-forget.
> habeas mark beforehand. Is there ma
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:51:45PM -0600, Kevin Roberts wrote:
> Is there a way to tell the bayes learning system to forget everything and
> start over from a clean corpus sa-learn session? The reason I ask is I may
> have many emails that were auto posted and learned that were learned the
> wrong
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 04:44:03PM -0500, Jonathan Calvert wrote:
> The tutorial only mentions adding rules to the local.cf file. If I place additional
> .cf files in the /etc/mail/spamassassin dir, will they be included? Or should I
> append my local.cf?
All .cf files in /etc/mail/spamassassin
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 02:32:33PM -0800, Mark Squire wrote:
> Why is it that I can do an nslookup on a particular server's A record ,
> and it's MX record successfully, but Postfix can't? Note the error
> below when the server from that domain connects:
>
> Postfix/smtpd[1368]: connect from unkn
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 08:17:57AM -0600, SAtalk Mail User wrote:
> I have a question i regards to razor2 and spamassassin - this is what I see
> from my maillog, I have spamd in debug mode, I am wondering if you can tell me
> if razor is being used. If so how can I tell that razor2 is being utili
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:07:40PM -0800, Russell Mann wrote:
> Jan 7 15:38:38 judah spamd[28532]: razor2 check skipped: Bad file
> descriptor Insecure dependency in connect while running with -T switch at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/IO/Socket.pm line 108.
>
> I've downgraded back to
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:42:56AM -0600, Dale wrote:
> I am getting an error when trying to start spamd
> Undefined subroutine &Mail::SpamAssassin::Util::untaint_var called at
> /usr/local/bin/spamd line 95.
> this started after I updated SpamAssassin from 2.53 to 2.61 can someone
> help?
My init
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:09:32AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> i am getting the following bayes error when trying to do a
> force-expire. Is there any way around this so i can expire my old
> tokens?
>
> debug: bayes: expiry check keep size, 75% of max: 75
> debug: bayes: token count: 0,
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 03:50:59PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 132 hit BAYES_99. Is there some way, with a meta rule if nothing else, to
> say if BAYES_99 hits, cancel out the USER_IN_WHITELIST hit?
Sure, but if you use whitelist_from_rcvd instead of whitelist_from,
you'll have a much smalle
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 02:15:47AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Yes. Don't install it from CPAN. It is better if your package
> manager knows about your installed files. Instead install the rpms
Also, ES 3 probably has the same problem as RH 8/9 and Fedora wrt the
LANG bit. You can try the fix f
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 07:54:34AM -0500, Mark London wrote:
> Actually, no. The rule is matching the username to the To: address, not
> From:. The purpose of spammers doing this is to think it's a personal
> message, so it has to be the username of the person receiving the spam.
Doh! You're
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 09:33:23PM -0500, Mark London wrote:
> Hi - I see the rule USERNAME_IN_SUBJECT, but I've never seen that
> triggered at my site, and a test message sent to myself did not trigger
> it. We are using spamassassin with sendmail, mimedefang, cyrus, and
> redhat linux. Any i
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 03:42:05PM -0800, Chris Petersen wrote:
> My question is why the auto *whitelist* is adding points to the
> message. Shouldn't it be subtracting them? Before the spam started,
The whitelist part is a misnomer. It's an automatic score adjuster
(white/black-list if you wan
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 08:03:19AM -0800, Regis Wilson wrote:
> It seems incredibly easy to me to write an eval routine that extracts the
> email address of the To: field, extracts the part before the "@", and then
> finds that substring in the subject.
Yup. already have a rule for that. The ver
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:17:54PM -0700, pjh wrote:
> I'm frustrated because I'm not getting unambiguous answers to my questions :-)
> Again, if I (as an end user) didn't use sa-learn at all, would Bayesian
> filtering occur
> on my incoming email (presumeably because of a default or generic
> mod
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 03:39:12PM +0100, Csaba Kiss wrote:
> debug: auto-learn: currently using scoreset 3. recomputing score based
> on scoreset 1.
> debug: Score set 1 chosen.
> debug: auto-learn: original score: 0.1, recomputed score: 0.001
> debug: Score set 3 chosen.
> debug: auto-learn? ye
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 04:28:29PM -0500, Daniel Ellard wrote:
> I thought perhaps spamc/spamd wasn't looking at my user_prefs, but
> this doesn't seem to the problem -- my whitelist and blacklist entries
> still are working as always. The only flags to spamd are -d and -L,
> so I don't see a prob
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 12:02:50PM -0600, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> spell checking hurts obfu because splitting a correctly spelled word
> with a word boundary will cause 2 or more mis spelled words...
>
> Subject: looking for xa/nax,
>
> looking: ok
> for: ok
> xa: not found
> nax: not found
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 10:02:35PM +0100, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Or has this already been taken into account when doing the GA
> process?
There's lots of issues with RBLs in the GA, but we're working on
addressing them. For instance, we're looking to get rid of the GA for a
better/fast
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 09:10:00PM +0100, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> (The RBLs aren't included in the GA process, are they?)
Yes. Everything, including the Bayes scores, are GA derived.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"I don't get the army: they kick you out for being gay, but their big pl
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 01:14:07PM -0500, John Sickles wrote:
> test USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO is triggered. But he is not listed in local.cf
> (or any files in /usr/share/spamassassin) in a "all_spam_to" entry. When I
> run this mail by hand with "spamassassin -D < mail" there is no hit for
> USER_IN_AL
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 12:09:36PM -0500, Mike Kuentz (2) wrote:
> What version of SA does this web page reference?
>
> http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
apparently 2.70. :(
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"It is our job to protect the magic smoke ..." - Prof. Mi
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 11:10:14AM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Note that this is just a summary of me looking at diffs, and any errors are
> the result of my misreading or misinterpretation of the data.
[...]
> 9) some general misc rule tweaks.
10) a completely rewritten MIME parser ... I'm fa
On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 02:17:05PM -0500, Robt. Miller wrote:
> INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamc', `S=local:/var/run/sendmail/spamass.sock, F=,
> T=C:15m;S:4m;R:4m;E:10m')dnl
> .. I checked and there's no spamass.sock anywhere in the system. I've
> installed it twice and it's not there, what should I try?
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:27:01AM -0800, Don Caprio wrote:
> This email had a rating of 5.3 however the X-Spam-Level: only has two
> stars?
>
> Anyone know what's up with this?
I could have sworn this was in the FAQ.
The problem is that the message is being filtered through SpamAssassin twice.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 05:50:24PM -0600, Rachael Stewart wrote:
> I have SA 2.61 running on RedHat 8. I've compiled a set of spam and ham
> messages (using Pine) for the Bayes seed, but I'm having trouble with
> the initial call to sa-learn. Has anyone seen this before?
Do you have the MIME::Base
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:22:29AM -0500, J. S. Greenfield wrote:
> I've seen a few comment here that SA has issues with perl 5.8. Anybody
> have a thumbnail sketch of what the issues are? Looks like RHELv3 comes
> with 5.8.0, so I'm trying to figure out whether it's necessary to
> downgrade t
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 03:04:48PM -0500, Amnon wrote:
> So I guess one cannot just replace the .cf files with newer ones, right?
Can, with some kluging. Want to? Probably not. Most rule changes take
place via code than via the cf files.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
I can't believe I ate th
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 11:49:37AM -0800, Bill Landry wrote:
> I was wondering if the SA developers are considering adding support for
> "Sender Permitted From" (SPF) in SA, as defined at spf.pobox.com? I have
We have test rules in 2.70 already. If you weren't at LISA 2003, we
pushed SPF at the
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 04:23:36PM -0800, S. M. C. Butler wrote:
> When I try to install DB_File using cpan I get
>
> version.c:30:16: db.h: No such file or directory
>
> Can anyone give me a clue as to how to resolve this?
Install the Berkeley DB libraries and development files. see your OS
ve
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:44:33PM -0400, Ricki wrote:
> Is there a was to prevent spamassassin from scanning mail from a particular IP
> address ?
The only way to do so is to not send mail from the IP address to spamassassin.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"To win, you must treat a pressure si
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 03:52:24PM -0600, jeremiah johnson wrote:
> I'm trying to install spam-assassin, but this is what is happening. I'd
> fix the makefile myself but I don't know anything about makefiles.
>
> also, pod2man IS in my path, contrary to what this script tells me.
>
> what can i
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:12:25AM -0600, Robert Nicholson wrote:
> So how do you forget a message then?
why do you want to forget a message?
> #forget old spam
> $spamtest->learn($learnmail, undef, 0, 1);
> #learn as ham
> $spamtest->learn($learnmail, undef, 1, 0)
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 02:07:25AM -0600, Robert Nicholson wrote:
> Consider the possibility that you have learnt something as spam and you
> want to relearn
> it as ham and vice-versa. Currently, if I'm not mistaken this requires
> the following
>
> wouldn't it be easier to simply say
>
> $m->
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 02:06:13AM -0700, Lukreme wrote:
> Now, somehow after processing a single message spamd has set the perms
> on the bayes_journal file to --
What is "bayes_file_mode" set to? By default it's 0700.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
If you want to program in C, progra
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 04:06:17AM -0600, Robert Nicholson wrote:
> Other than this I've been able to use Mail::Audit with Spamassassin but
> is there
> another way to go about this then?
We've pretty much already dropped Mail::Audit support.
Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit is really the only way
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:01:22PM -0500, Tim B wrote:
> I don't think I've seen this covered ever. can required_hits = 5.5?
yes. the documentation (and code) specifies 5.0 as the default.
integers are used just for simplicity, but floats are allowed.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"The most u
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 05:31:28PM -, Alan Munday wrote:
> Does this include the SDK?
No. You wouldn't find the SDK in a single RPM anyway. I should have
all the required module SRPMs in that directory though. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Anyone who thinks UNIX is intuitive should be
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:38:32AM -0500, Larry Gilson wrote:
> Does anyone have up-to-date source RPMs for DCC (1.2.22) and Razor2 (2.36
> including the patch)?
I have Razor at
http://www.kluge.net/ftp/pub/felicity/SRPMS/razor-agents-2.36-1tvd.src.rpm
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
I'm just sa
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:37:46PM -0800, Kirk Moore wrote:
> Is there a tool that would take and expand out a regex rule showing all the
> possibilities that rule makes?
If I recall my Computer Science classes correctly, the answer is no.
Which doesn't mean the trivial regexps aren't possible to
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:00:04AM -0500, Pedro Sam wrote:
> Why did I suspect that 3 did not work? because I found many tokens in the
> bayes database that could only had come from SA markup. Tokesn like
> "BAYES_99" were considered VERY spammy.
I was going to tell you that it's not a valid a
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:38:09AM -0500, Jason Lieurance wrote:
> Received: (qmail 85522 invoked by uid 85); 17 Dec 2003 14:27:45 -
> Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by redhat.vipersystems.biz by uid 82 with
> qmail-scanner-1.16
> (clamscan: 0.65. spamassassin: 2.61. Clear:SA:0(-8.0/7.5)
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:16:07AM -0500, Jason Lieurance wrote:
> It tags the message with X-Spam-Status: YES/NO and the hits number but no list of
> the tests it ran, no rewrite of the subject, and no attachment of the original. 2.55
> did all these things and I don't see the problem with my loca
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:26:18AM -0500, Jason Lieurance wrote:
> tagged a message SPAM yes/no it used to list what tests were done but not anymore
> and it does NOTHING to messages tagged as spam. It use to rewrite subject, say the
When you say it does "NOTHING", are there any X-Spam-* headers?
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:33:31PM +, Muhannad Tamemi wrote:
all HTML -- boo!
the answer to your question is in the FAQ.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Windows 95 is the only true Operating System -- it does whatever it wants.
All others should be called Co-Operating Systems." - Unknown
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:40:49AM -0500, stan wrote:
> Will, for instnace spmassaina -r --mbox mailbox_name work?
nope. 1) --mbox isn't a spamassassin option, 2) spamassassin only
handles 1 message at a time.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Choose your weapons to match the war." - Brad
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:53:30AM +0200, Emil Samovsky wrote:
> I'm running SA v2.61 on RedHat 5.0 with sendmail and spamass-milter.
> Evrething is working fine.
RH 5.0? Really?
> bayes expire_old_tokens: panic: sv_setpvn called with negative strlen at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Ma
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:26:04AM +0100, hans mayer wrote:
> i am using SpamAssassin-2.60
> in conjunction with mimedefang 2.37
> and sendmail 8.12.10 on solaris 8
>
> but subject is still the original text
> without the word spam.
>
> any ideas ?
sounds like a mimedefang question.
--
Rando
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:02:54PM -0800, Jean-Francois Guilmard wrote:
> So I wonder if it's clever to install perl 5.8 or I'd better stay on 5.6
> ?
You can use either. I personally prefer 5.6, but SA runs fine on 5.8
as well, you'll just have to deal with the LANG= thing during install.
--
R
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:35:39PM -0500, Covington, Chris wrote:
> Try using amavisd-new instead of spamd:
another option is spampd (notice it's different than spamd). take a
look on google for it. I'm using it for site-wide filtering for the ol'
employer, works great. :)
--
Randomly Generate
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:34:11AM -0700, Nels Lindquist wrote:
> Huh. When did that change? The manpage definitely agrees with you,
> but it would seem that "auto_learn 1" is still accepted; no errors
> from --lint and bayes is behaving properly.
I changed the bayes configs to all have "bay
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 03:25:44PM +1000, Peter Kiem wrote:
> Well it definately was a LOT higher than 20 so I guess that means my
> Bayes database is stuffed :(
:(
> So I delete the bayes_seen and bayes_tok files and start again with my
> spam collection?
Sounds like a plan.
> Or would just de
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 02:17:49PM +1000, Peter Kiem wrote:
> Number of spams = 20? It was over 1500 at least! It must have been
> Bayes expiring out heaps of stuff.
The # ham/spam count doesn't change during an expire. If it is 20 now,
it was 20 before.
> Should Bayes be expiring messages
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 12:33:26PM -0800, sabat wrote:
> The spamassassin manpage talks about setting up an alias to report spam,
> piping the mail to spamassassin -r. Since this reports to DCC and Razor,
> shouldn't one clean up the headers first? Isn't there risk of getting
> your own domain n
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 05:40:49PM -0800, Fred Bennett wrote:
> version.c:30:16: db.h: No such file or directory
>
> Now I'm at a loss. It's probably staring me right in the face, but being
> a Linux/Spamassassin/CPAN noob and a tired, fried one at that, I don't
> see what should be tried next. So
1 - 100 of 1108 matches
Mail list logo
