receiving server.
The way it is now, it is just another header that can be added by a spammer,
and as long as nobody turns him in to habeas.net, he is guaranteed an easier
path for his junk. (if I am missing something, please feel free to educate
me. Just be nice when you do it)
Terry
will follow suite and turn this rule off too.
Terry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Douglas Kirkland
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Turning off Habeas?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
I have several clients with valid .biz domains that only send legitimate
email.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dragoncrest
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Should I just outright block *.biz d
Thomas Nilsen wrote:
As you can see from the header info, the message got 8, and we have the
spam level set to 8.. Why would it not tag this email as spam?
Its because the X-Spam-Status: No. is rounded off, it may have only
scored 7.75, count the stars in X-Spam-Level, there's 7
tm
Try this:
http://www.spamassassin.org/full/2.6x/dist/USAGE
tm.
john walsh wrote:
Hi.
I am new to spamassassin, but it looks very good and I would like to use
it.
After reading a lot of DOC's, I have decided what I want to do, but none
of them have
shown me how to do it.
I want to run spamd
Mike Kuentz (2) wrote:
Terry Milnes wrote:
I am not exactly sure what you want, sprintspectrum.com is
NOT the same
domain as sprint.com, its irelevant that it may be hosted on the same
servers and owned by the same people.
I'm aware that sprintspectrum.com & sprint.com aren&#
I am not exactly sure what you want, sprintspectrum.com is NOT the same
domain as sprint.com, its irelevant that it may be hosted on the same
servers and owned by the same people.
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sprint.com
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sprintspectrum.com
Terry
Have you tried dropping the comma after [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't see
the comma included in the spamassassin.conf man page.
Marcio Merlone wrote:
Hello all,
I think my whitelist_to is not working, can someone help me?
On /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spam]# grep [EMAIL PR
re -f
:0
*
./the_users_name_here/Maildir/
Terry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I've tried to run Spamassassin (spamc/spamd) with vpopmail on a per-user
basis by adding the following line to the .qmail- file:
| spamc | /var/vmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox
but unfortu
Are you sure the earthlink servers don't have another name prepended?
eg mail server name = mail1.earthlink.com, therefore it would be
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tm.
Billy A. Pumphrey wrote:
I added a few entries in the local.cf to let all earthlink email come
through hopefully but it didn’t work. Her
Barb Bautista wrote:
Newbie question...sorry for my ignorance.
What do I do with the "tests performed" available here:
http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html
Could someone please explain if I should just copy this file into a .cf file
in my local.cf? I am currently running SA site-wide.
That's ju
Has anyone considered changing the spelling? Just changing the last i to an
e (spamassassen) just might be enough.
If you don't then you can expect exactly this type of activity from Mcafee.
Considering that Spamassassin is now the "preferred" spam tool for ISPs, and
getting some great press, th
Barry Porter sent me a link to the following (we were discussing this
off list):
http://www.xs4all.nl/~mvz/software/msgconvert.pl
This appears to be what I need
Terry
Terry Milnes wrote:
I am looking for a script that can convert the .msg file that is created
when you copy an outlook
extra stuff that MS likes to use to
pad a simple few byte message into kb's....
Terry
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux
Robert Harrison wrote:
Hi all,
Lots of helpfull people say this can be done by configuring SA to do it.
Well I guess lots of helpful people are wrong then.
However these same people don't mention how this can be done,
Thats because SA can't do it
so do any of you nice people out there know h
What do you mean by "user rules"? if you mean user preferences I
have preferences in mysql that are not in the local.cf and they do work.
Terry
Adam Denenberg wrote:
I believe Dallas touched on this some time ago when 2.55 was released
but not sure of the status. It appears sti
ting criteria that can only result in an
overall low score because its compared to products that it does not
claim to be.
I think I may understand why you felt it necessary to include SA, it is
after all the benchmark that many companies like to use for comparison,
and in many cases are
Frederick M Avolio wrote:
At 06:13 AM 11/25/2003 +0100, Mark wrote:
Is SA hard to install? Not harder than any other program based on
Perl. Perl
is the underlying engine, which, in and by itself, has nothing to do with
SA. It is good to keep that in mind;
Perhaps this is *my* problem. November
spend their spare time deleting
the emails opposed to spending the money.
Terry...
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code?
front than down the road. Software upgrades are done
in the comfort of my house, using SSH and webmin, usually taking only a
couple hours, if that, at my convenience...
-Jim
-Original Message-
From: Terry Milnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 11:16 AM
To: Je
The company I did this for is a small company, a large user base doesn't
mean a large company. The same can be said for the larger companies,
they may have an admin who makes 20 bucks an hour so their costs would
be in the $30 an hour range.
There were other considerations I didn't even mentio
From spamassassin man page:
-a, --auto-whitelist, --whitelist
Use auto-whitelists. Auto-whitelists track the long-term average score
for each sender and then shift the score of new messages toward that
long-term average. This can increase or decrease the score for
messages, depending on the l
2,700 for 2 years
Postini $ 2,700 for 2 years
ProofPoint $ 2,000 for 2 years
SpamAssassin$ 3,100 for 2 years
51 users, is another story though..
Terry
Jeremy Dold wrote:
Does someone want to respond to this guy and point out the obvious?
http://www.infoworld.com/articl
n't need to
keep telling me its "Still running as root..."?
Terry...
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE
Ditto, kinda, mine is specific to this list:
whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] lists.sourceforge.net
Works for me and is harder for spammers to abuse.
Note that for this to work your mail system must be set up in such
a way that spamassassin can "see" the e
erprefs would be removed, If this
is the case, and support for an option to use a username is to be
dropped, I guess I would have to look elsewhere for an anti spam
solution because it just isn't going to work in my environment where
there are no "real" users.
Terry
---
Marco Schnüriger wrote:
Hi all
I've got spamassassin 2.60 running (as root, not fine I know). Sendmail
is working with spamass-milter which calls spamassassin. My system is a
red hat 8.0 box. In /var/log/maillog I see those recurring events:
Nov 17 10:19:36 probivirix spamd[30674]: cannot write to
Margit Meyer wrote:
Further I created accounts for all these "spamboxes". As a result every
user has two mailboxes: his "normal" mailbox, e. g. peter and a second,
the"spambox", e. g. peter_spam.
Now a user may (if he misses a mail) or may not look at his spambox to
control whether Spamassassin is
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Terry
Milnes
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 4:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bounce all but whitelist
Haha I just had to try this Blacklist [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the db for that
particular u
This list seems to be worse than most though, go figure .
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 07:18 AM 11/12/03 -0500, Terry Milnes wrote:
Are the threads on this list screwed up by the list program, or is it
just users replying to existing mail to create new?
Just wondering, because it seems to be
Haha I just had to try this Blacklist [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the db for that
particular user, then add his acceptable senders as whitelisted entries.
Don't know about any negative ramifications, but it does work and will
fit in with the way you want it to.
tm
Tim Merkel wrote:
I have a clie
Are the threads on this list screwed up by the list program, or is it
just users replying to existing mail to create new?
Just wondering, because it seems to be terribly messed up
Terry...
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon
Margit Meyer wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:51:51 -0800
"Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All seems good. I am trapping all spam and viruses in /var/virusmail (they
are in .gz format)
Does anyone have any suggestions on how I can add some better management
around spam that we have blocked, that we ne
and what happens when you run spamd -D from the command line?
Rajdeep Larha wrote:
I installed SpamAssassin as per the documentations available at the
spamassassin.org. I instaleld all the dependent modules and it installed
fine w/o any error,
I checked and verified using the command listed in
ess I could start with my corpus and add to it as I do mine, and
watch the test accounts to see how well it works.
Thanks
David B Funk wrote:
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Terry Milnes wrote:
The bayes filtering works great, but the typical user is not going to
want to jump through what he would conside
Lukreme wrote:
On 10 Nov 2003, at 07:33, Terry Milnes wrote:
The typical user is capable of making toast in his electric toaster,
but when it comes to the overwhelming complexities involved in
operating a computer he is totally lost. He will become extremely
agitated when he looses the *REALLY
IN_DYNABLOCK 0" etc. to their local.cf to ignore this feature.
Dial up isn't literal it means for the most part you belong to a
residential class dynamic ip address.
Dunno nuttin' about the eudora thing though...
Terry...
Bob Rosenberg wrote:
I have been informed that a
with the procmailrc.
(I get confused when someone mentions "Exchange Server")
Terry
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML,
Lukreme wrote:
On 08 Nov 2003, at 06:46, Terry Milnes wrote:
Some of us though are system administrators and need a solution to
offer to the end users. The typical end user wants to open their
email and see no spam, period.
Since the definition of spam varies from person to person that is
you are correct, it doesn't resolve for me either
Mark wrote:
Is it just me, or is bl.spamcop.net gone? I am no longer able to get a DNS
resolution for it.
- Mark
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Ve
Now I don't expect SA to know dutch; that would be unfair. But what I
would
like is some way to score those english terms way higher than an american
would or could. For an american, mortgage does not spell spam per se. But
for ME it does, and I can practically guarantee I will not ever get an
em
-d -c -a -u spamd -H /home/spamd"
fi
Terry
Russell Mann wrote:
Yeah I can confirm a spamd startup script works
Send yours, also send what you use from the command line, what OS you
use. etc. etc.
tm.
I did send that stuff before - trying to save some list bandwidth. Ce'st la
vie
Although I use qmail/vpopmail/mysql etc. I call spamc from procmail,
don't use the qmail-scanner-queue, so my method is a little different
than yours but it may help, the spamc call uses the -u username option...
eg. users procmailrc file:
LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail
VERBOSE=ON
### Spam Assassin
Haha this guy "Doctor Electron" is a moron oops I defamed him...
His paper "The Smart Gateway: Port-to-Local-Host Address Mapping" was
also entertaining
tm.
Matthew Cline wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
Hmmm... The article claims that SA itself genera
Haha this guy "Doctor Electron" is a moron oops I defamed him...
His paper "The Smart Gateway: Port-to-Local-Host Address Mapping" was
also entertaining
tm.
Matthew Cline wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/ispassassin.html
Hmmm... The article claims that SA itself generate
This is a spammers wet dream come true, send out 15,000,000 'IMPORTANT'
emails, use a bell smtp server and it reaches the end user 8 times so he
doesn't miss the valuable message.
The same problem has been occuring at sympatico.ca as well, another
"Bell" company. It started about 3 weeks ago.
Don't know if I can be of much help here becaue I don't have a
required_hits directive in local.cf, I thought it would be redundant
when using the sql preferences.
Anyway I slapped that directive into local.cf, then reloaded spamd, ran
a test message and the answer is the local.cf does not appe
s.
--Larry
-----Original Message-
From: Terry Milnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:45 PM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin updates
Hold it a sec, not all rpms contain the source, in fact unless things
have changed I thought that most
Hold it a sec, not all rpms contain the source, in fact unless things
have changed I thought that most contained precompiled binaries, and
that was the problem with them.
I work primarily with source installations, I have no problem tracking
what was involved during the install process, granted
Hodgson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:09:36PM -0400, Terry Milnes wrote:
Personally I don't see how its possible to run a customized server using
rpms only.
You need to build your own RPM's for stuff that isn't already packaged
or for software that you want special optimizat
Darren Coleman wrote:
I'm Linux SysAdmin at the company I work for, I always install
everything from source.
A colleague, a Windows SysAdmin, installs everything on his Linux boxes
from RPMs.
Personally I don't see how its possible to run a customized server using
rpms only.
A windows system admi
l be a
Fedora n, I would also assume that the concern that started this thread
with regards to RPM support is unfounded.
tm
E R wrote:
That might be because it might not be called RedHat anymore, it's the
Fedora Project
Terry Milnes wrote:
I don't know how you arrive at that conclusio
I don't know how you arrive at that conclusion, versions prior to 7.1
have reached end of life. RH states that there will be no errata
released for those versions.
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/archives/
They also state that versions up to 9 will reach end of life at the end
of this ye
ften the consonant string is
longer than 5.
Anyway, I don't know if this info is useful to you at all. I am very
much a newbie at using SA, learning about tests, Bayes, etc. It was a
fun exercise, though. :)
--
Terry
---
This SF.net
I am relatively new to the SAtalk list, so forgive this "stupid" question:
Just what is HAM?
Terry Shows
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott
Blomquist
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 11:42 AM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R
s from falsly identifying the RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK.
Terry
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing lis
t what of all the people who use an ASP's mail
service opposed to their ISP?
Terry...
Ryan Moore wrote:
I guess I'm either confused or a little too tired, but I'm not seeing a
problem with what is happening. The IP 65.48.80.27 is listed in the
dynablock list, so when the receiving s
contained recipient addresses... I
ran this a dozen times to make sure it wasn't an isolated case, and was
incluing the recipient address in the content for fater reference.
Terry...
HEADER FROM RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK MESSAGE-
From - Wed Sep 24 14:06:52 2003
X-UIDL: 1064426808.23
ully their policies haven't changed.
Thanks for the response btw.
Terry
Gerry Doris wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Terry Milnes wrote:
This may be a little difficult to explain but here goes.
All of my systems are behind a nat box. My mail server OS is linux,
using qmail/vpopmail/mysql p
al up block, surely it should not be marked as such, even if the
RECIPIENT is in a dial up block.
Anybody have any ideas what could be causing this?
TIA Terry
HEADER FROM RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK MESSAGE-
From - Wed Sep 24 14:06:52 2003
X-UIDL: 1064426808.23355_0.london.interface.on
It could be relativly static if each admin makes up their own... The
admin could also write a script to verify the name resolution.
Alternativly perhaps verisign could register a domain name that could be
used for this purpose.
tm.
Gert Lynge wrote:
So presumably, looking up a garbage address
y a pretty tightly locked down mail server & which is
working well. I have around 15 domains that are handling mail, so I
need to try & keep the server up & running while not stuffing any
working things up. Thanks again.
I just wanted to ask , can I blacklist an entire domain for a particular
user in his spam settings (Web iterface)
blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Put that in the users config file
Chris
I prefer [EMAIL PROTECTED], the example above will not blacklist the entire
domain, mail from [EMAIL
uld be greatly appreciated.
--
Bye for now, Terry Allen
___
hEARd
Postal Address:
hEARd, 26B Glenning Rd, Glenning Valley, NSW 2261, Australia
Internet -
WWW:
http://heard.com.au or http://www.ozemail.com.au/~hma
Another dumb question. Where is "rbl_timeout" located? I can't find it
anywhere.
-- Terry
Rich Puhek wrote:
>
> The dsbl lists were not resolving earlier today, still appears to have
> problems.
>
> One fix (suggested by Matt Kettler in a different thread earlier
in a huge volley.
I only want it to check one or two of the RBLs. Is the correct way of doing
this done by setting the score to 0 or is it done by commenting the checks
out somewhere in /usr/share/spamassassin ?
Thanks,
Terry
---
This s
il to themselves all day long and not bother us at
all.
Terry Poperszky
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing
That explains it, thanks.
Terry Poperszky MCSE, CCNA
Network Manager
SOS Staffing Services
801-257-5706
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:23 AM
To: Terry Poperszky
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
does not, nor has ever hosted the email for this domain, why in the world would he be getting them?
Terry
I just upgraded (2.40 - 2.42)using the .tar and it was dead simple.
Three commands, then restarted spamd. Life is happy and no errors
showing in my log file.
Terry Poperszky
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Chris Santerre
Sent: Monday
I will be out of the office starting 07/20/2002 and will not return until
07/29/2002.
I will respond to your message when I return. If there is an immediate need
to contact a CCIS representative, you can call our office at 610-518-5700.
---
71 matches
Mail list logo
