Okay, this is now clear. And the answer to my question is "no".
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harri Pesonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Dan Wing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Theo Van Dinter&q
No, my question had: "Content analysis in message body text".
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harri Pesonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Dan Wing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Theo Van Dinter&q
I would say A3 = YES (with SpamAddIn at least, if the message has internet
headers), but how can B1 and B2 be YES or MAYBE? This is news to me.
- Original Message -
From: "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Harri Pesonen'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
L PROTECTED]>
To: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Harri Pesonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: [S
I still don't get it. The report is not in attachment, the original message
is. The report is in message body.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harri Pesonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Dan Wing" <[EMAI
No, it does not handle it correctly, so you should not learn messages that
have already been detected as spam. This is one thing that should be
improved (the VB6 source code is there).
SpamAddIn could also work like SpamBayes: Put the spam status and analysis
into user definable fields when it is
f I create a mbox of these messages with DbxConv, so that
the original message is still in attachment, does sa-learn detect this and
only process the attachment?
- Original Message -
From: "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Harri Pesonen'" <[EMA
BAYES_99 bigger
scores:
score BAYES_90 0 0 4.027 4.0score BAYES_99 0 0 5.200 4.2
I have noticed that SA has missed a couple of mails, score about 4.8, even
though Bayes gave them 90% or 99% probability.
--Harri Pesonen
pii.net (Postfix)
; "
Learned from 1 messages.
debug: synced Bayes databases from journal in 1 seconds: 914 unique entries
(236
9 total entries)
...
- Original Message -
From: "Dean Gallea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Harri Pesonen'" <[EMAIL PROTEC
: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 23:34:48 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status:
fuerte
http://www.med12z.com/pa";>http://www.7x24pharm1.com/ra.gif";>
http://www.med12z.com/page/a.html";>easy exit
----=_3F369F94.D59A0
But if the original message is in attachment, spam status in headers, and
content analysis in message body text, does sa-learn to handle it correctly?
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harri Pesonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
rning.
Filtering is optional.
--Harri Pesonen
Use Bayes.
- Original Message -
From: "Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:23 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] bqtW Powerful DVD copy software. nhmW Now you can save
your favorite movies. (fwd)
> Hi Guys,
>
> Here is another one that sneaked past Spam
I added the following, is that
correct?
whitelist_from_rcvd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sourceforge.net
--Harri Pesonen
age -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harri Pesonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] The correct use of Bayes
> At 05:02 PM 8/3/03 +0300, Harri Pesonen wrote:
> >
I think that the autolearn is bad, because it only
learns from those spam messages that it knows to be spam for certain in any
case, and the same for ham as well. OK, it does not necessarily mean that Bayes
agrees what SpamAssassin thinks. Anyway, currently I have autolearn disabled and
only
rri,
>
> On Saturday 02 August 2003 08:47 CET Harri Pesonen wrote:
> > So SAproxy or SpamAssassing (win32) uses a localized month name (elo =
> > elokuu = August), which Outlook Express 6 is unable to convert right. Is
> > this problem is SAproxy or SpamAssasin?
>
> Y
All *SPAM* that I get from SAproxy has invalid
date. Today the date is 2.1.2003, yesterday 1.1.2002, the month is wrong. I
checked the e-mail header, and it has
Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by
skywalker with SpamAssassin (2.55
1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp); la, 02 elo 2003 08:41:57
+
I found this:
http://sa.reusch.net/
I have not tried it yet, but I will, at
work.
--
Harri
The --dir option in sa-learn must be broken. I guess that it does not
process files that have spaces in them, or something similar. I solved the
problem by converting Outlook Express folder (.dbx) into mbox format using
DbxConv utility (http://people.freenet.de/ukrebs/dbxconv.html), and then
proces
Thanks, sounds good.
-Original Message-
From: Klaus Mueller
Harri Pesonen wrote:
>
> Is it possible to integrate SA with Outlook client, when I use
> Exchange server, not POP3? Or at least clean the Inbox periodically
> if tight integration is not possible.
Hi,
I created
Title: Message
Is it possible to
integrate SA with Outlook client, when I use Exchange server, not POP3? Or at
least clean the Inbox periodically if tight integration is not
possible.
--
Harri
Title: Message
I just yesterday
installed SAProxy for use with Outlook Express POP3 account. It works, but when
I try to teach it my old spam collection, it does not learn from it! I use the
--dir option, and save e-mails in .eml format from OE. Sometimes it learns
a couple of messages from
23 matches
Mail list logo
