I think that the autolearn is bad, because it only learns from those spam messages that it knows to be spam for certain in any case, and the same for ham as well. OK, it does not necessarily mean that Bayes agrees what SpamAssassin thinks. Anyway, currently I have autolearn disabled and only feed Bayes those messages that SpamAssassin misses, spam or ham. Is this a correct way of thinking?
 
Of course I had to sa-learn a minimum of 200 messages before Bayes started working. Could it be that the Bayes stops working correctly if autolearn is not enabled?
 
--
Harri
 

Reply via email to