I think that the autolearn is bad, because it only
learns from those spam messages that it knows to be spam for certain in any
case, and the same for ham as well. OK, it does not necessarily mean that Bayes
agrees what SpamAssassin thinks. Anyway, currently I have autolearn disabled and
only feed Bayes those messages that SpamAssassin misses, spam or ham. Is this a
correct way of thinking?
Of course I had to sa-learn a minimum of 200
messages before Bayes started working. Could it be that the Bayes stops working
correctly if autolearn is not enabled?
--
Harri |
- Re: [SAtalk] The correct use of Bayes Harri Pesonen
- Re: [SAtalk] The correct use of Bayes Matt Kettler
- Re: [SAtalk] The correct use of Bayes Harri Pesonen
- Re: [SAtalk] The correct use of Bayes Theodore Heise