Abigail Marshall wrote:
Hello Rich,
Wednesday, July 30, 2003, 4:20:52 PM, you wrote:
RP> I've been pondering an idea for an improvement to SA. Would anyone else
RP> find the following to be useful:
RP> report_safe_attach_threshold -- set threshold above which a mail has to
RP> score to have re
Mail from one of my domains (suckycentral.com) keeps getting marked as
spam due to the fact that SA insists it contains words of an adult nature.
Even if it's a blank message.
Is there anyway I can remove the word suck from "adult list" so my mail
won't keep getting bounced internally?
Thanks,
Jo
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 05:26:50PM +0100, Angel Gabriel is rumored to have said:
>
> Can someone give me a working example of how procmail should be calling
> spamassasin? This is all I have in my ~/.procmailrc file.
>
>
> :0fw | /usr/bin/spamassassin
Try this:
---cut---
VERBOSE=on
LOGABSTRAC
No, the answer is yes. If the report is in the headers, the body gets
left alone, and sa-learn will parse the body, just fine.
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Harri Pesonen wrote:
> Okay, this is now clear. And the answer to my question is "no".
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Burger" <[E
--On Thursday, August 07, 2003 5:01 PM -0500 Rich Duzenbury
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry to jump in here - The latest gook I received is below.
The main message was marked as SPAM for other reasons, but this thread
has gotten me thinking a bit.
Rather than trying to build a rule to find obvi
Folks --
just to add to this thread of absurd spam filtering.
Without naming names -- if you're going to mail me directly, and you're
blocking all mail from .ie using one of those country code blacklists,
YOU WILL NOT RECEIVE A REPLY because that's where my server lives.
It's also worth noting, i
I tried compiling razor-agents and razor-agents-sdk from
source...razor-agents-sdk comes with a number of the perl modules...that's
where I believe it got hosed, in the first place. However, the method I
used to reinstall Time::HiRes was to recompile and install the Time::HiRes
bundle that cam
Hey all!
I've just installer Razor with SA and got this problem that's driving
me crazy...
When I run SA on the trial spam mail by doing:
spamassassin -tD < sample-spam.txt
i get the following in the debug output and Razor isn't run:
...
debug: entering helper-app run mode
razor2 check skipped: No
Now that my mail is actually getting filtered, I'd like to know how I
can teach SA, what I actually consider to be spam? I'm not sure how to
get to grips with SA-learn.
I want to be able to forward mail to an alias, and have the attachment
sent to SA-learn so that mail from the same people ends up
> -Original Message-
> From: Angel Gabriel
> On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 18:03, Larry Gilson wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Angel Gabriel
> >
> > > I don't see anything from spamassassin in the mail headers.
> > > I'm not even sure how to check that spamassass
>> It looks like orbs.dorkslayers.com is, sadly, offline once again. If
>> there are any active queries against it perhaps they should be
>> removed to streamline the tests. Here is some information I was
>> able to find on it.
>
> First trustic, now dorkslayers, jeez I hope this isn't a trend.
- Original Message -
From: "Clark I Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 4:19 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] FORGED From: myself? use of unwhitelist_from ??
> 1) I do not know of anything I can do to stop Forgers from using
> my good email address to
Is it possible to have the attachemt only, piped into sa-learn ?
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 16:31, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 10:45 AM 8/11/2003 -0400, Russell Premont wrote:
> >setup an address that users could forward spam to, so I could then run
> >sa-learn on the mail folder. My question is can I u
At 20:59 4/08/2003 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 05:38 PM 8/4/2003 -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
Simon Byrnand writes:
>By default will it try to use one common AWL database, or will each user
>have their own AWL database ? If both options are possible which is
>recommended ?
By default, it will creat
I got all the debug info, and the result was this message is spam, i
just want to know how to get it to do that with all my incoming mail.
Can someone give me a working example of how procmail should be calling
spamassasin? This is all I have in my ~/.procmailrc file.
:0fw | /usr/bin/spamassas
> Forwarding adds the .qmail file involved the forward address
> and the original maildir address. Has anyone modified Dallas'
> example with spamassassin to allow routing to occur? I think
> it's a really simple use of maildrop for just this purpose...much
> easier than procmail overkill...a
I have upgraded the SpamAssassin rules wiki at http://www.exit0.us. It
has a new look & feel. I would appreciate it if you check any
contributions you have made and make sure they were migrated correctly.
Hope you enjoy the update.
---
This
Yes, it works. I run sa-learn with -D, and it shows that it parses correct
Received headers. So I can learn my whole Spam folder if I want!
...
debug: tokenize: header tokens for *F = "Tam Passier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
debug: tokenize: header tokens for To = "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
debug: tokenize: h
This is answered once a day, thank you Matt Kettler for posting the answer:
Read the manpage.. this is disabled by default in 2.55 for security
paranoia reasons, at least when you're running spamd it is. If you add
"allow_
Hi folks,
I just received the attached maessage, it tripped SA at 5.6 but the only
thing that got hit was the BL rules. How did this get such a low score?
curious,
Scott
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.6 required=5.0
tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_NJABL
At 01:33 PM 8/8/03 +0200, Alexander Pubanz wrote:
I want to disable the Version Info of Spamassassin in the mail headers.
I am talking about this line: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55
(1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Can someone telle me what to write in the config to disable it ?
As you see
I would suggest using RedHat as there are
many HOWTO's for using it with SA. You can either buy the RH CD's
from a retailer or download them from the Internet.
--
Benjamin Story
Dot Foods, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Paul Natola
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Hey everyone. Sorry if this has come up recently - I just got back on
the list.
I unsubscribed several months ago, shortly after upgrading to 2.55
because I was receiving *maybe* 1 FN every month. Not bad since I got
an average of 30 or 40 spams/day, and haven't has a single FP since
upgrading.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamc/spamd not checking all messages
>
> I use:
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -a 4000 /usr/bin/spamd -D
>
> I don't get mail from AOL users, so I can't check the headers of
> legitimate AOL messages. Are there any versions of the AOL software
> that use User-Agent instead of X-Mailer?
I used to run the mail development team there... the headers are added by
the AOL server software, not the client its
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:30:53PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:17:39PM -0400, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> > I checked. They are not 0. My user_prefs file contains the following:
> >
> > score BAYES_40 0.0 -0.056 -0.034
> > score BAYES_44 0.0 -0.010 -0.007
> > score BAY
26 matches
Mail list logo
