On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Kelson Vibber yowled:
> Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>You'd have to run the files through spamassassin -d before passing them
>>to razor, and sa-learn also has to do that, so spamassassin -r is faster
>>(you're only doing the equivalent of a -d once)
>
> Only if you have SA
Is there any simple config option to shut off all the assorted SA filtering
options, except Bayes and whitelisting by collecting 'outgoing' e-mail
addresses?
Something along the lines of "OptionsToTurnOn" rather than shutting down
each filtering option I don't want?
These are the two features
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.c
At 04:09 PM 7/18/2003 -0500, Jeff Funk wrote:
I'm sure this is a silly question, but it's one that I haven't been able
to find documentation on and has kept me from using the Bayes stuff in
SA. Does it matter whether the header info is included in the e-mail
when submitted to sa-learn? From what
Hi Guys,
(B
(BHere is another sneaky one. It is entirely in Japanese, so I have set the
(Bfollowing in my user_prefs:
(B
(B# Languages--rejects non-English spam
(Bok_languages en
(Bok_locales en
(B
(BLater--
(BTim
(B
(B-- Forwarded message --
(BReturn-Path: <[EMAIL PRO
I originally sent this to Jordan directly by accident and not the list. My
apologies!
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Jordan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Has anyone integrated SpamAssassin into Postfix such that any high
> scoring spam can be rejected during MTA rather than this pr
I'm sure this is a silly question, but it's one that I haven't been able
to find documentation on and has kept me from using the Bayes stuff in
SA. Does it matter whether the header info is included in the e-mail
when submitted to sa-learn? From what has been said in this thread, it
sounds like o
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, James Miller wrote:
> I'm having a similar problem and I'm still unclear how to completely
> disable HTML defanging in a message. I have set 'defang_mime 0' in
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf (for mimedefang) and
> /usr/share/spamassassin/10_misc.cf report_safe 0.
Chris Knipe wrote:
The South African Police Service are actually investigating multiple cases
of fraud and other crimes against these spammers. South Africans have been
asked to forward the mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] They have also
established a local web site, http://www.saps.org.za/cimeprev/nig
> "JJ" == Jason Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JJ> Has anyone integrated SpamAssassin into Postfix such that any high
JJ> scoring spam can be rejected during MTA rather than this process of
JJ> simply categorizing?
The latest postfix *snapshot* releases can do this using amavisd-new
(or a
> "SAC" == Scott A Crosby writes:
SAC> Yes. Thanks.. For my current work, observe this regexp used by SA:
SAC> 2 '[EMAIL PROTECTED](?:[\-.0-9A-Z_a-z]+\.)+\w+'
SAC> Feed it a bunch of dot's followed by a non-word...
SAC> Say... '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
SAC> and, on some regexp interpreters, t
At 03:02 PM 7/18/2003 -0400, Walter Ray wrote:
HI
What "exact" file should I be looking for to create a Whitelist and
Blacklist
Add your whitelist and blacklist commands to /etc/mail/local.cf OR
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs
Documentation of the commands can be found in:
man Mail::SpamAssas
> What "exact" file should I be looking for to create a Whitelist and
> Blacklist
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
or
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs
For example, see
http://maxo.captainnet.net/mailAdmin/spamAssassin/add.html
Joe
---
This
At 01:38 PM 7/18/2003 -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote:
Sorry for the repost, but trying to get this all figured out. Now that
i know defang_mime has evolved into "report_safe 2", does anybody know
how to get the defang capabilities without SA actaully putting a report
in the email?
You might be able t
Tony Earnshaw writes:
> David B Funk wrote:
>
> > OK, I'm sorry I wasn't clear enough about the environment. The AOL client
> > was using a web browser (HTTP not SMTP) to sent the message, via a
> > webmail (HTTP-2-IMAP/SMTP) gateway (running 'IMP'). I understand about
> > requiring dial-up clien
HI
What "exact" file should I be looking for to create a Whitelist and
Blacklist
Thanks!!!
Walter
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a
> > Add this to your sendmail.mc and you will get no mail from china.
> >
> > FEATURE(dnsbl,`cn.countries.nerd.dk', `SPAM from
> China:$&{client_addr} rejected' )dnl
>
> Except that Joe's relaying out via a Postfix server ;)
The most efficient way would be to block using Postfix then. It is
well i am actually trying to *enable* defanging, but i dont want the SA
report along with the defanging. thats what i am trying to figure out.
How to defang html email without SA dropping a report in the email.
adam
On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 13:53, James Miller wrote:
> I'm having a similar proble
I'm having a similar problem and I'm still unclear how to completely disable HTML
defanging in a message. I have set 'defang_mime 0' in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf (for mimedefang) and
/usr/share/spamassassin/10_misc.cf report_safe 0. What am I missing to completely
disable HTML d
Sorry for the repost, but trying to get this all figured out. Now that
i know defang_mime has evolved into "report_safe 2", does anybody know
how to get the defang capabilities without SA actaully putting a report
in the email?
thanks in advance
adam
-
On Friday 18 July 2003 17:20 CET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 July 2003 20:21 CET Justin Mason wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > >1) Have spamd re-read local.cf when it receives a HUP signal, rather
> > > > that having to be
Mike Staver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok, I think I see what you man here - saying that I could use this
> procmail filter... and I could then blacklist fimble.com so any
> external mail from fimble.com gets blocked.
Well, what I'm suggesting is that you use an alternate method to
determine
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> On Thursday 17 July 2003 20:21 CET Justin Mason wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >1) Have spamd re-read local.cf when it receives a HUP signal, rather
> > > that having to be stopped and restarted
> >
> > Yep, that'll be in for 2.60.
>
> But
here is a version that only needs the spamd logs
http://mailhost.bccwebhosting.com/mrtg/sstats.tar.gz
it creates part of the stats on this page
http://mailhost.bccwebhosting.com/mrtg/
Jim Ford wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying spamstats, but there seems to be insufficient logging for it to
return meaningfu
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 1:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] How to get SAproxy to work with Outlook Express - my
> configuration
>
>
> No doubt - like the rest of you I HATE spam, to that end I
>
Hello Everyone! :-)
I have a program that does this:
use Mail::SpamAssassin;
$spamobj = Mail::SpamAssassin->new();
my $status = $spamobj->check_message_text(\"Email Message Text Goes Here\");
(In other words, I'm not using the "spamassassin" executable or spamd to
send the message to Mail::Spam
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Leghart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:03 PM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] (OT) DSL/DIALUP manual BL Catch 22
>
>
> --On Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:56 AM -0400 Chris Santerre
Just, FYI
I'm not sure if it's applicable to other countries - it more than likely is
if you can find the correct details...
The South African Police Service are actually investigating multiple cases
of fraud and other crimes against these spammers. South Africans have been
asked to forward the
Sorry to put this on the SA list, but I'm having a problem with SAProxy
and I can't find the list address.
By the way, the problem is that it hangs. If I have 10 or 20 messages at
my ISP, its fine. But somewhere around 50 it hangs and I have to use
Taskmanager to clean it up. This is version 1.2.
> The problem is that older versions of spamassassin aren't taint safe. I'm
> not sure if the proper code was already in the 2.5x series, but 2.60
> (currently in beta/prerelease state) will be able to run in taint mode.
> Which version of SpamAssassin do you run?
I did run Spamassassin 2.55 but f
On Friday 18 July 2003 15:46, you wrote:
Oh really, thats good to know, I am upgrading now then.
Thanks for the input
R
> At 11:32 AM 7/18/03 +0200, Ryan Lumsden wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >Simple quiestion, does Razor2 work with RA 2.20
>
> I doubt it, but a better point would be that nobody should
At 11:32 AM 7/18/03 +0200, Ryan Lumsden wrote:
Hi
Simple quiestion, does Razor2 work with RA 2.20
I doubt it, but a better point would be that nobody should be using SA 2.2x
unless they are GAing their own scoreset on a regular basis...
---
Hi Guys,
These Nigerian scammers are really getting creative. This one scored 1.1!
Tim
-- Forwarded message --
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.localdomain (Postfix)
Yes. I having been using Bayes since about the day Paul Graham published
his algorithm. I have always hand picked messages I knew where spam
(trollboxes) or ham (hand picked). I found that filter, which I still
maintain, was so much more effective than SA autolearn, that I disabled SA's
bayes fi
I updated this morning. Now it gives me the same message only on line 155
not 154?
--john
-Original Message-
From: Malte S. Stretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Hill, John
Subject: Re: spamd 2.60-cvs
On Thursday 17 July 2003 23
> I have a procmail file like this:
>
> LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail.log
> VERBOSE=yes
>
> :0fw
> * < 256000
> |/usr/bin/spamassassin -D
> :0e
> {
> EXITCODE=$?
> }
> :0:
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> /usr/log/SPAM
>
>
> OK this makes a log of every sp
ok report_safe 2 seems to work, but i dont want the SA report in the body of
the message. Is it possible to get the funtionality of report_safe 2 ,
without the SA report? report_safe 1 seems to attach the original message
yet stiull print a report, and report_safe 0 doesnt do any "mime defanging"
On Friday 18 July 2003 07:18 CET Tomas Pluskal wrote:
> Is there any way how to tell spamassassin to NOT analyze large messages?
From [1]:
| 4.10. SpamAssassin/spamd seem to take a very long time to scan large
| emails, and are bogging down my server. What can I do?
|
| Spamassassin will attempt
Have you looked into MessageWall?
messagewall.org
you can use it to do rbldns lookups before
the mail gets to SA and is also very fast.
we check about 8 ip rbls including our own
and 3 source address rbls for every message
coming to our mailers and it does the checking
in about a second.
Hence we
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 01:20:42PM +0200, Henrik Larsson wrote:
> Hi
>
> I know this is properly not a pure Spamassassin issue as you can se below,
> but since all the Spamassasin experts is here, I would take the liberty to
> asking the question anyway.
>
> Please don't flame me to much if this
On Friday 18 July 2003 13:20 CET Henrik Larsson wrote:
> I know this is properly not a pure Spamassassin issue as you can se
> below, but since all the Spamassasin experts is here, I would take the
> liberty to asking the question anyway.
>
> Please don't flame me to much if this is this is way off
Hi
I know this is properly not a pure Spamassassin issue as you can se below,
but since all the Spamassasin experts is here, I would take the liberty to
asking the question anyway.
Please don't flame me to much if this is this is way off topic.
I have recently installed DCC to add this to my che
Hi
I know this is properly not a pure Spamassassin issue as you can se below,
but since all the Spamassasin experts is here, I would take the liberty to
asking the question anyway.
Please don't flame me to much if this is this is way off topic.
I have recently installed DCC to add this to my che
Klaus Pforte wrote:
I have an older Redhat 7.2 mail/web server and want to install SpamAssassin.
On this system I cannot upgrade to perl 5.6.1...
Some other tries didn't work.
Is someone here who has some experiences about this?
Or solved this problem?
This is a heavily updated RH 7.2 machine. I
Steven W. Orr wrote:
Add this to your sendmail.mc and you will get no mail from china.
FEATURE(dnsbl,`cn.countries.nerd.dk', `SPAM from China:$&{client_addr} rejected' )dnl
Except that Joe's relaying out via a Postfix server ;)
Tony
--
Tony Earnshaw
I love the music of Wagner. The only sound th
I have a procmail file like this:
LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail.log
VERBOSE=yes
:0fw
* < 256000
|/usr/bin/spamassassin -D
:0e
{
EXITCODE=$?
}
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
/usr/log/SPAM
OK this makes a log of every spam that enter in my ma
Hi
Simple quiestion, does Razor2 work with RA 2.20
R
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
- Original Message -
From: "Gorm Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "spamassassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:54 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] Configure Bayes Path
> To get a single database instead of one for each user, I added
> "bayes_path /this/that/bayes" to the local.cf fi
Hi,
I'm trying spamstats, but there seems to be insufficient logging for it to
return meaningful stats. Spamd logs OK, but spamstats appears to need
sendmail logging info in addition. Sendmail will probably forever remain a
mystery to me (I'm scared of the reputedly difficult creation of the conf
the problem is that I have the line too slow so if I make a test an
send an e-mail from my mail-server1 to my mail-server2 (are on my lan) it
takes 30-40 seconds to arrive.(are two biprocessor DELL with scsi
drive)..because we are waiting the response of rbldns...(osirusoft ,mail
abuse...
To get a single database instead of one for each user, I added
"bayes_path /this/that/bayes" to the local.cf file. The database was
formed and is being populated by sa-learn; however, when mail is
evaluated, the error "Cannot open bayes_path /this/that/bayes R/O:
Permission denied" is generated.
Yes but I'm using qmail..(this is not the problem because I think that qmail
have the possibility to block the mail arriving from an ip address )...in my
opinion the problem is that you througth out the e-mail and here we are
speaking about of "possible" spam mail .not sure...because no one lis
52 matches
Mail list logo
