On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Kelson Vibber yowled: > Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>You'd have to run the files through spamassassin -d before passing them >>to razor, and sa-learn also has to do that, so spamassassin -r is faster >>(you're only doing the equivalent of a -d once) > > Only if you have SA alter the message. If all you do is add headers, > you can put them in your list for Bayes to skip. Razor, Pyzor and DCC > only act on the bodies.
That's true. I keep forgetting that that's possible... :) >>as well as being more >>effective (you're reporting to DCC and Pyzor as well, if you use them). > > But if you can bulk-submit to each service (possible with mbox, I'm > not sure about maildir), you save the overhead of connecting and > logging into each one. Yes. Bulk-submission *would* be nice. > AFAIK, you would have to run spamassassin -r for each message. This is what should change, really. (Maybe I'll do it, but not for a couple of months minimum; real life's got insanely hectic.) -- `We cannot get a new line down the pipe due to a blockage and we cannot dig up the road to clear the blockage because it is covered with the wrong type of tarmac.' --- British Telecom, via Mark Lowes ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
