> The processing time is a little higher than I like it though.. I would
> like it to be < 1 second for most messages. So, I want to drop one of
> those tests. Which one is least beneficial?
I find Razor2 to be the most beneficial when it works. Sometimes the servers
don't work for a day or two.
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:10:59PM +0800, Adrian Ho wrote:
> Does all the mail that originates inside your network have to be relayed
> through your mail servers? If so, consider setting up a separate
> mail relay that doesn't run SpamAssassin and is only accessible from
> within your network, the
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:16:32PM -0500, Ben Rosengart wrote:
> I want to protect mail that originates inside our network. Such
> mail carries return addresses from many different domains. In
> addition, there is no requirement that mail with a panix.com return
> address must originate inside ou
Andrew Brooker wrote:
I am running a sitewide config of SpamAssassin with Sendmail +
MIMEDefang.
I was wondering if it's possible to use a SQL database with this
configuration?
I was hoping to be able to pass the e-mail address to the SQL database,
if the user's e-mail address is not in the d
I'm having a little problem getting the firsthop tests to work with the
RBL+, I have:
header IHUG_RCVD_IN_RBL_PLUS rbleval:check_rbl('ihugrblplus',
'rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org.')
header IHUG_X_DULrbleval:check_rbl_results_for('ihugrblplus', '127.1.0.2')
header IHUG_X_DUL_FH rbleval:check_rbl_
NATIONAL ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY
NIGERIAN WATER WAYS APAPA,
LAGOS.NIGERIA
CELL PHONE:234-804-213-8559
REPLY TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DEAR FRIEND,
YOUR COMPANY'S NAME AND ADDRESS WAS GOTTEN FROM A
BUSINESS DIRECTORY IN MY SEARCH FOR A WELL KNOWN
BUSINESSMAN WHO HAS NO QUESTIONABLE CHARACTER AND
You can whitelist anything from *@panix.com, etc.
I wouldn't recommend doing so, though. This would allow spammers to fake
the @panix.com in their From: lines, allowing the spam to get in more
easily.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Ben Rosengart wrote:
> Hello spam assassins,
> Panix is about to deplo
> >
> > I am running a sitewide config of SpamAssassin with Sendmail +
MIMEDefang.
> > I was wondering if it's possible to use a SQL database with this
> > configuration?
> > I was hoping to be able to pass the e-mail address to the SQL database,
> > if the user's e-mail address is not in the datab
Andrew Brooker wrote:
Hiya All,
I am running a sitewide config of SpamAssassin with Sendmail + MIMEDefang.
I was wondering if it's possible to use a SQL database with this
configuration?
I was hoping to be able to pass the e-mail address to the SQL database,
if the user's e-mail address is not in
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:05:56PM -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
>
> Why not just whitelist *@panix.com? That should handle exactly what you
> want.
I want to protect mail that originates inside our network. Such
mail carries return addresses from many different domains. In
addition, there is
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:47:59PM -0500, Ben Rosengart wrote:
> Hello spam assassins,
> Panix is about to deploy spamassassin on a fairly wide scale.
[snip]
Why not just whitelist *@panix.com? That should handle exactly what you
want.
--
Ross Vandegrift
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A Pope has a Water
Hello spam assassins,
Panix is about to deploy spamassassin on a fairly wide scale.
We'd like to find a way to protect mail originated inside Panix
from being flagged by SA, without the sender having to do anything
special. My approach to this so far has focused on the Received
header:
header O
My experience, really, has been the procmail already being configured as
the default LDA, and the .forward being in place.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Dave Young wrote:
> this is an MTA error.
>
> try creating a symlink /usr/adm/sm.bin which points to /etc/smrsh
>
> I've noticed that some incarnations
Hiya All,
I am running a sitewide config of SpamAssassin with Sendmail + MIMEDefang.
I was wondering if it's possible to use a SQL database with this
configuration?
I was hoping to be able to pass the e-mail address to the SQL database,
if the user's e-mail address is not in the database then a gl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin J. Steil spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
> I have been looking for a good install faq for using sendmail and SA
> together on a SMTP Gateway server...anyone know of one..?
http://www.linux-sxs.org/sendmail_antispam.html
- --
Dou
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have this in my local.cf
> I am still getting huge CPU spiked from spamd
> I am trying to disable external lookups that may be taking CPU
> This does not seem to have much effect.
> I also have a dedicated and very fast DNS server for these 4 mail se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I don't see any German language rules in SA's default configuration and
most of my German spam (about 1 message a day) does not get tagged by SA.
Is someone working a on German ruleset already, collecting German spam or
anything related?
Jan
-
this is an MTA error.
try creating a symlink /usr/adm/sm.bin which points to /etc/smrsh
I've noticed that some incarnations of smrsh actually look in /usr/adm/sm.bin
instead of /etc/smrsh.
hth,
Dave
On Wednesday 06 November 2002 12:36 pm, Mike Burger wrote:
> First, and foremost, try rena
Well, after further investigations it looks like it actually is
spamassassin which is giving the problems. It checks the message in
0.00112 seconds with razor! The problem is when the message has big
attachments!
- Peter
> On Wed, 06 Nov 2002 10:40:34 +0100
> "Peter M. Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nope. The only parameters I'm passing are -u and a username, and -p and an
alternate port.
Coincindentally I've downgraded the system to perl 5.6.1 and it's been
running without issue for 24 hours. I'll monitor it for a few more days and
determine that the "fix" for the moment until I find more i
Set up a procmail recipe that forwards anything "X-Spam-Status: Yes" to
the single account...you can do that in the domain's users' accounts, or
you can do it in the global procmail.rc with a * ^TO.*@domain.com check.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, James Sizemore wrote:
> I use Spamassassin site wide (us
First, and foremost, try renaming your .forward to soemthing else, and
then try sending mail to that account, again.
In *most* default installs, procmail is already set up as the local
delivery agent. Putting a call in .forward to procmail will then confuse
the issue.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, [Win
Thanks Matt.
Yeah I am noticing a much higher processing time with Razor2 than with
DCC. I think I will just remove the Razor test.
The SA score for the DCC test is low enough to keep legit messages from
exceeding my threshold (6) for the most part, so I think I can keep that
one. :)
Thanks for
For what it's worth, here's a summary of what I've gleaned from my
experience and the various lists:
DCC isn't really concerned with a message being spam or not, they only are
concerned with it being "bulk". So they intend to match non-spam
newsletters, etc.
Razor is intending to only list mes
This is done easily in procmail, by checking for the spam status. Check the
procmail example that came with SA.
But this may NOT be a good idea. Suppose some worker's wife sends him an
email like,
"When you get home I'm going to RAPE you like the little love monkey you
are!" and ect
SHould t
> -Original Message-
> From: James Sizemore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 06 November 2002 05:50
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] There has to be a way.
>
>
> I use Spamassassin site wide (using Postfix and transports)
> This works great, I had a request from one of the
If you're setting up a check and forward box using sendmail on Linux,
check out the README in spamass-milter at www.milter.org
Quentin Krengel
\ \ ! / /
( @@ )
___o000--000o
___][__][___][___
___][__][__][___][
I use sendmail spamass-milter from www.milter.org and spamassassin to
tag spam on mail that my server forwards.
My server is the highest priority server for my client's domain (their
server is the lowest prority so that if mine goes down they still get
mail)
My server is set to forward all mai
This is indeed the problem. Looks like it will take more work to
set up the rules (ie one header and score for every server I want
blacklisted). I will continue to play with this.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt
Kettler
Sent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, John Schutz wrote:
> Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 11:31:46 -0600
> From: John Schutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jan Korger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: SpamAssassin ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] 60_whitelist.cf
>
> I'll abst
Right now I am running both DCC and Razor2...
The processing time is a little higher than I like it though.. I would
like it to be < 1 second for most messages. So, I want to drop one of
those tests. Which one is least beneficial?
Thanks!
-Paul
-
Greetings,
I am running Spamd/DCC/Razor2 with qmail/qmail-scanner/sophos on a
fairly high volume mail server.
I noticed that after adding the Razor2 test, my messages take about 1.2
seconds on average to be processed. So I thought that if I used the old
-S option to spamd, it would stop processin
Wait, are you trying to blacklist a subject or a received? The last time
you posted this rule it was a received header rule.
Your rule for MY_BLACKLISTED_RCVD is changing quite drastically. Do you
have multiple rules with this name?
Each of your own custom rules need to have their own distinct
Running the debug output shows no surprises. It is using my rules
directory and razor just fine. I can also test this because directly
about one of my custom rules another one is checked and found when
tested.
header FFL_FOR_FREDsubject=~/FFL*/
score FFL_FOR_FRED-20
works but
header
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 12:18:30PM -0500, Mike Schrauder wrote:
> Where can I find docs on what this is, how it is generated, etc
> X-Spam-Prev-Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
It's a defanged header. It used to be the same without the X-Spam-Prev
bit on it.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
I kn
I'll abstain on the debate as to whether places like amazon should be
whitelisted (I can see both sides), but:
If some people want to receive them, they can always whitelist them in
their personal configuration files but as long as this in the
/usr/share/spamassassin config files I cannot undo th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What's the point of this configuration file? Why should some sites
generally be allowed to send spamy looking messages. Take amazon for
example. They send a lot of commercial emails, people did never ask for.
They tell you you could opt out (as just ab
Where can I find docs on what this is, how it is generated, etc
X-Spam-Prev-Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
TIA
Mike S
SBI
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://a
I went ahead and upgraded to 2.43 yesterday afternoon, deleted the
whitelist, and let it start rebuilding.
As for the Joe-Jobs...has anyone had luck actually getting these caught
by SA, or coming up with local rules for these? The poor guy here is
getting pounded with them. It actually caught
I use Spamassassin site wide (using Postfix and transports)
This works great, I had a request from one of the domains
that go through my mail server to have all tagged mail
go to a single account.
I have look around and could not find a way to make
postfix do this. So using anything anywhere.
I have been looking for a good install faq for using sendmail and SA
together on a SMTP Gateway server...anyone know of one..?
Thank you,
Kevin
--
This e-mail transmission contains information intended only for the use of
the recipient(s) n
I'm trying to install spamassassin for "personal use" as stated in your
INSTALL page. When I try to send mail to the "protected" account, I get the
following:
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
"|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 #user"
(reason: 55
On Wed, 06 Nov 2002 10:40:34 +0100
"Peter M. Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After upgrading to qmail-scanner 1.15 I suddenly get some x-spam-status
> Yes even though spamassassin is not even run. Further it is not spam. I
> just snip' ing one of the mailheaders. I'm running spamassasin 2
Hi,
I added these lines to my spec file:
mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man5
ln -sf %{_mandir}/man3/Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf.* \
RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man5/spamassassin.5
> man -k spam
Mail::SpamAssassin (3pm) - Mail::Audit spam detector plugin
spamassassin (5) - SpamAssassin configura
44 matches
Mail list logo
