I'm having a little problem getting the firsthop tests to work with the
RBL+, I have:
header IHUG_RCVD_IN_RBL_PLUS rbleval:check_rbl('ihugrblplus',
'rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org.')
header IHUG_X_DUL rbleval:check_rbl_results_for('ihugrblplus', '127.1.0.2')
header IHUG_X_DUL_FH rbleval:check_rbl_results_for('ihugrblplus-firsthop', '127.1.0.2')
score IHUG_RCVD_IN_RBL_PLUS 0.01
score IHUG_X_DUL 2.0
score IHUG_X_RBL_DUL_FH -2.0
num_check_received 8
However even when I bump num_check_received up to 8 (as above) it still
never matches IHUG_X_RBL_DUL_FH even though the other 2 RBL rules are
matched.
However this works:
header IHUG_RCVD_IN_RBL_PLUS rbleval:check_rbl('ihugrblplus',
'rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org.')
header IHUG_RBL_FH rbleval:check_rbl('ihugrblfh-firsthop',
'rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org.')
header IHUG_X_DUL rbleval:check_rbl_results_for('ihugrblplus',
'127.1.0.2')
header IHUG_X_DUL_FH rbleval:check_rbl_results_for('ihugrblfh-firsthop',
'127.1.0.2')
score IHUG_RBL_FH 0.01
score IHUG_RCVD_IN_RBL_PLUS 0.01
score IHUG_X_DUL 2.0
score IHUG_X_DUL_FH -2.0
But the strange thing is that in the above the IHUG_RBL_FH never matches
even though the IHUG_X_DUL_FH does.
A sample from someone who has this working correctly would be great.
Using 2.43
--
Simon Lyall. | Newsmaster | Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Network/System Admin | Postmaster | Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ihug, Auckland, NZ | Asst Doorman | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
