It'd be nice to be able to reject the spam on the way in, but I
guess we don't know its spam until we have it and the relay passing it
on to us has signed off...
Harold
Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 07:46:13PM -0400, Brian Kendig wrote:
> > I'm using spamd/spamc via fetchm
> SPAM: Content analysis details: (9.6 hits, 5 required)
> SPAM: EARN_PER_WEEK (4.3 points) BODY: Contains 'earn $something per
> week' SPAM: EXCUSE_14 (0.4 points) BODY: Tells you how to stop
> further SPAM SPAM: EXCUSE_10 (0.4 points) BODY: "if you do not
> wish to re
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 05:54:38PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
| On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 07:46:13PM -0400, Brian Kendig wrote:
| > I'm using spamd/spamc via fetchmail and procmail. When
| > SpamAssassin flags an email as spam, is there any way for me to
| > 'bounce' that mail back to the sender a
Older versions of SA didn't catch this at all ...
- Forwarded message -
SPAM: Content analysis details: (9.6 hits, 5 required)
SPAM: EARN_PER_WEEK (4.3 points) BODY: Contains 'earn $something per week'
SPAM: EXCUSE_14 (0.4 points) BODY: Tells you how to stop further SP
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 07:46:13PM -0400, Brian Kendig wrote:
> I'm using spamd/spamc via fetchmail and procmail. When
> SpamAssassin flags an email as spam, is there any way for me to
> 'bounce' that mail back to the sender as if I never received it?
Yes, but you need to do it at SMTP time. O
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 07:46:13PM -0400, Brian Kendig wrote:
> I'm using spamd/spamc via fetchmail and procmail. When
> SpamAssassin flags an email as spam, is there any way for me to
> 'bounce' that mail back to the sender as if I never received it?
Often, no. The return addresses are often
I'm using spamd/spamc via fetchmail and procmail. When
SpamAssassin flags an email as spam, is there any way for me to
'bounce' that mail back to the sender as if I never received it?
Right now I have it filter spam into a separate mailbox which I
occasionally glance through and delete. But
On Wednesday, July 10, 2002, at 08:54 , Ryan Cleary wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, David B. Bitton wrote:
>
>> I know this may seem like an odd request, but how can I disable the checks
>> relivant to porn?
>
> I'm on linux-kernel, and there are lots of messages with the following
> lines:
>
Her
Your better off to ask this on [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
Several of us have done what you want.
Some of use have even offered to give it away.
Might save you some work...
Brad,
I'll leave you to answer the forked question...
Shane Hawrysh wrote:
>
> I've been writing a utility to integrat
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:51:55PM -0400, Shane Hawrysh wrote:
| I've been writing a utility to integrate spam assassin with dmail's
| 'external_processor' feature. I'm wondering how well spamc works when you
| have, say, 50 forked processes each starting up spamc and tossing a message
| at it.
I've been writing a utility to integrate spam assassin with dmail's
'external_processor' feature. I'm wondering how well spamc works when you
have, say, 50 forked processes each starting up spamc and tossing a message
at it. I'm not subscribed to spamassassin-talk, so if you could cc: me
directl
You'd think that "increate penis size" would trigger some rule or another.
Maybe freehostchina.com should also be added for some score or another,
too? (I don't know how legit of a service this is, but most things coming
out of chinese webhosts these days aren't good).
-Chris
-- F
That did it! Thanks much.
> -Original Message-
> From: CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:04 PM
> To: Jeremy Oddo; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SA + qmail + vpopmail + maildrop
> Filter Spam on Alias'
>
>
>
> Hey all--
>
> I'm using SA to filter out spam and it works great. The only problem I
> have, is that I cannot filter mail that goes through an alias. For
> example, let's say I have an account "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and I make an alias
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (aliased to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]). My "f
Hey all--
I'm using SA to filter out spam and it works great. The only problem I
have, is that I cannot filter mail that goes through an alias. For
example, let's say I have an account "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and I make an alias
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (aliased to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]). My "foo" account
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 the voices made Ryan Cleary write:
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 the voices made Darren Coleman write:
> >
> > > This is such a special case that it would probably be the wrong thing to
> > > do to insert additional rules into the pu
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 the voices made Darren Coleman write:
>
> > This is such a special case that it would probably be the wrong thing to
> > do to insert additional rules into the public distribution of SA just to
> > take account of this. Easiest
> This is such a special case that it would probably be the wrong thing to
> do to insert additional rules into the public distribution of SA just to
> take account of this. Easiest solution is just to zero the rules or, if
> this isn't acceptable, write your own regexps to handle the cases you'v
At 7/9/02 6:36 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>Hi Robert and Justin,
>
>I've documented the original idea (well, saved some emails :-)
>at http://bl.reynolds.net.au/ksi/
>
>I've been focusing on learning who to run a dnsbl service,
>scanning, and integrating it all together. Current system
>was spread
Good thinking :)
Dunno how I missed that.
Daz
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony L. Svanstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 July 2002 17:20
> To: Darren Coleman
> Cc: Ryan Cleary; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David B.
> Bitton
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Disable Porn Filtering
>
>
> On Wed, 10
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 the voices made Darren Coleman write:
> This is such a special case that it would probably be the wrong thing to
> do to insert additional rules into the public distribution of SA just to
> take account of this. Easiest solution is just to zero the rules or, if
> this isn't a
This is such a special case that it would probably be the wrong thing to
do to insert additional rules into the public distribution of SA just to
take account of this. Easiest solution is just to zero the rules or, if
this isn't acceptable, write your own regexps to handle the cases you've
mentio
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, David B. Bitton wrote:
> I know this may seem like an odd request, but how can I disable the checks
> relivant to porn?
I'm on linux-kernel, and there are lots of messages with the following
lines:
#
# Amateur Radio support
#
# CONFIG_HAMRADIO is not set
which triggers th
Jim Hale wrote:
> I know that SquirrelMail has something that will do it, but I'm using
> the Horde Suite.
Horde are working on just such a package, called "sam". It's not released,
but it is in their CVS repository. I grabbed a copy last week and had a wee
bit of a poke, but didn't have much l
Is there some sort of Web Based front end that a person can get into to modify
their own personal setting for what they want filtered or not want filtered?
I know that SquirrelMail has something that will do it, but I'm using the Horde
Suite.
Thanks! :)
Jim Hale
---
http://hale.dyndns.org
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 the voices made [EMAIL PROTECTED] write:
> Matt suggests (and IMO it's a good plan) that we modify the AWL to use
> "mailaddr:sendingip" as the key instead of just "mailaddr". This would
> avoid this problem, and the similar one where spammers are now forging
> spams with a F
Hi,
You could just set all the PORN_* scores to 0.0 in your relevant user
prefs. files.
Daz
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
> B. Bitton
> Sent: 10 July 2002 13:48
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Disable Porn Filte
I know this may seem like an odd request, but how can I disable the checks
relivant to porn?
--
David B. Bitton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.codenoevil.com
Code Made Fresh DailyT
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Two, two, TWO treats
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 02:54:35 -0600
"Michael Moncur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks! I'll have to play around with that. Now I just wish there was some
> way to report messages from Outlook without losing 90% of the headers.
"Forward as attachment"?
Of course, then you'd have to handle the m
> It's a few bits of perl I threw together. I didn't make it public mostly
> because I just didn't get around to it. ;)
Thanks! I'll have to play around with that. Now I just wish there was some
way to report messages from Outlook without losing 90% of the headers.
--
michael moncur mgm at
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Bob Proulx mused:
[Hormel SPAM]
> their trademark. It is their revenue source. What would you do in
> their place?
Um, I hate to point this out, but Hormel's revenue source is a physical
product, not a trademark.
(sheesh, IP madness)
--
`There's something satisfying about
31 matches
Mail list logo
