On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 the voices made Darren Coleman write: > > > This is such a special case that it would probably be the wrong thing to > > do to insert additional rules into the public distribution of SA just to > > take account of this. Easiest solution is just to zero the rules or, if > > this isn't acceptable, write your own regexps to handle the cases you've > > mentioned - both on your own private installation. > > The correct solution is, of course, to whitelist the mailinglists...
Unless you don't want to receive the spam that gets sent to the lists... I agree that adding the Linux kernel specific rules is a bit much, but there are already rules for diffs and pgp headers, so maybe the geek code rule might be worthwhile as an indication that the message is probably not non-spam. -Ryan -- T Ryan Cleary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL: http://people.interdimensions.com/tryanc PGP: 82 93 32 D7 3A AC C0 8D 34 56 96 CC DA DB 5E 2B ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Two, two, TWO treats in one. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
