"Shane Hird" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
acclod$5qn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:acclod$5qn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > ---
> >
> > [b.] Because of the above problem, I am using a .procmailrc of;
> >
> > :0fw
> > |/home/user/bin/spamassassin/spamassassin -P -c
> > /home/user/bin/spamasssa
> ---
>
> [b.] Because of the above problem, I am using a .procmailrc of;
>
> :0fw
> |/home/user/bin/spamassassin/spamassassin -P -c
> /home/user/bin/spamasssassin/rules
>
> The paths will be changed once I install it globally. However at the
moment
> it doesn't seem to doing AWL properly.
I'm in the process of revising the date difference testing. So far,
here's what I've done:
- fix timezone addition/subtraction (it was sign-reversed!)
- don't compare unparseable dates (caused false positives)
- don't require seconds (per RFC-2822)
- added support for North American time
I am trying to deploy spamassassin site-wide on a Sun/Solaris machine but am
having a few difficulties.
[a.] I can't get spamd to run. I am using 'perl spamd' (because perl isn't
in the /usr/perl5/5.00503/bin/perl path) and get the error:
Can't locate syslog.ph in @INC (did you run h2ph?) (@INC
>> I have SpamAssassin running with Communigate, I just installed razor
>> (Downloaded, compiled, installed). How can I verify that it is
>> working with SpamAssassin and/or is there any configuration necessary
>> to get it to check the database for received emails?
I think you s
On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 17:17, Ed Kasky wrote:
> Could you post that procmail recipe to the list?
I started to, then did not because I have been lazy and took a shortcut
with it that really should be fixed before anyone else uses it. But I'll
post it now with lots of comments added. Maybe someone w
Sidney -
Could you post that procmail recipe to the list?
Ed
~~
At 04:27 PM Monday, 5/20/2002, Sidney Markowitz wrote -=>
>On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 14:18, Peter Scott wrote:
> > Does anyone have a rule for matching the Klez virus?
>
>Following Craig's suggestion, made earlier on this list, I instal
At 05:02 PM 5/20/02 -0500, Shane Williams wrote:
>On Mon, 20 May 2002, Peter Scott wrote:
>
> > Does anyone have a rule for matching the Klez virus? Normally I wouldn't
> > confound spam protection with virus protection, but this is one I want to
> > head off before it even gets downloaded.
>
>I'
On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 14:18, Peter Scott wrote:
> Does anyone have a rule for matching the Klez virus?
Following Craig's suggestion, made earlier on this list, I installed
f-prot for virus scanning and call it from procmail before any other
filters, sending any catches to /dev/null. That replaced
Matt,
| Unfortunately that's not strictly true.
|
| You could very easily poison the database using short english phrases. I
| see an awful lot of emails that just contain single words, such as:
| "Hello???" or "How did it go?" etc. Generating things like that using a
| Markov Chain system wo
Drop the colon, so just
header MUSI_CAL_GIG_GOPHERSubject =~ /Musi-Cal Tour Fetch:/
C
Skip Montanaro wrote:
SM>
SM> Given these lines in my user_prefs file:
SM>
SM> header MUSI_CAL_GIG_GOPHER Subject: =~ /Musi-Cal Tour Fetch:/
SM> describe MUSI_CAL_GIG_GOPHERSubject: indic
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 11:48:26PM +0200, Nipper, Arnold wrote:
> As I'm doing rbl checks already during receiving I wanted to turn off rbl
> checks. Setting skip_rbl_checks to 1 should do the trick. But output from
> below suggest that these checks are still performed. How can I check that?
Yo
On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 11:58:30AM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> You should do size-checking on the messages (or use spamc which does the size
> checking for you). Some of the tests get really really slow when run over large
> messages. If you're concerned about the time taken to process messag
Title: Razor
I have a dumb question. I have SpamAssassin running with Communigate, I just installed razor (Downloaded, compiled, installed). How can I verify that it is working with SpamAssassin and/or is there any configuration necessary to get it to check the database for received emails?
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Peter Scott wrote:
> Does anyone have a rule for matching the Klez virus? Normally I wouldn't
> confound spam protection with virus protection, but this is one I want to
> head off before it even gets downloaded.
I'm not entirely sure what mechanisms are available to you
As I'm doing rbl checks already during receiving I wanted to turn off rbl
checks. Setting skip_rbl_checks to 1 should do the trick. But output from
below suggest that these checks are still performed. How can I check that?
Arnold
spamassassin -t -D < /dev/null > /dev/null
debug: using "/usr/sh
Does anyone have a rule for matching the Klez virus? Normally I wouldn't
confound spam protection with virus protection, but this is one I want to
head off before it even gets downloaded.
--
Peter Scott
Pacific Systems Design Technologies
__
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yeah, I've got that working here. It's a pretty trivial change to
> SpamAssassin, but I haven't gotten around to integrating it yet. It's
> just a matter of setting the content-type to multipart/mixed, and set
> the first part to text/plain, and the
How do you log stats on SA? I know stats are logged inside the messages,
but is there a way to log them on the server? I am using SpamAssassin on
a site-wide basis, and would like stats on which rules are getting hit.?
Here's what I'm running in Procmail
--- snip ---
# Run SpamAssassin Daemo
Matt Sergeant writes:
> Every single one of these is a virus, not spam.
I think it's a worm, actually, but the headers are forged so I don't
know who's sending them, so unlike a trojan being sent from a
co-worker, it's basically unsolicited email that should be filtered.
I think trying to not f
I know there was a thread about this a little while ago, but this just happened to me
so I
thought I'd post.
Got this spam message in, and it was completely not scanned by SA.
The syslog entries show that spamd was contacted, but nothing came out
of it:
May 20 13:03:12 eclectic sendmail[2779]:
Ed Ames wrote:
>Has any thought been given to formatting the SpamAssassin "grading
> information" as a legit attachment rather than simple adding it to the
> beginning of the message body as text. Unfortunately, the text added
> to the beginning of the message really messes up some of the HT
On 20-May-2002 at 10:59:00 John Horne wrote:
> So, I thought I'd move this up onto one of the central mailhubs. These are
> Sun Solaris 8 (sparc) systems. They have perl version 5.6.0 on them; no
> razor. The 'perl Makefile.PL' worked okay, as did 'make'. But with 'make
> test' I get a whole load
We are proposing to use SA on our main mail gateways. Unfortunately,
users need (want) to know what rules caused a particular message to
classify as spam. I agree that keeping the info in the headers is a
technically eloquent solution, but it is a human factor thing...
Ed...
-Original Me
Klaus Heinz wrote:
> Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
>>Klaus Heinz wrote:
>
>
>>>
>http://www.05-cray.category.unique.zaam.net^A^T^T^T.co.fr;|https.am2002.goopt.com:8101
>>
>
>>Mozilla mail Highlights just one detected URL, from the http:// up to
>>(but not including) the pipe symbol. That doesn't s
On 20-May-2002 at 10:59:00 John Horne wrote:
> So, I thought I'd move this up onto one of the central mailhubs. These are
> Sun Solaris 8 (sparc) systems. They have perl version 5.6.0 on them; no
> razor. The 'perl Makefile.PL' worked okay, as did 'make'. But with 'make
> test' I get a whole load
Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Klaus Heinz wrote:
> >
>http://www.05-cray.category.unique.zaam.net^A^T^T^T.co.fr;|https.am2002.goopt.com:8101
> Mozilla mail Highlights just one detected URL, from the http:// up to
> (but not including) the pipe symbol. That doesn't seem to be what you're
> expectin
On 20-May-2002 at 14:38:53 Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2002, John Horne wrote:
>
>> I get a whole load of failed tests:
>
> Are you using the 2.20 release, or the latest SA from CVS?
>
> There was an errorneous cvs commit over the weekend that damaged one of
> the rules files. See b
On Mon, 20 May 2002, John Horne wrote:
> I get a whole load of failed tests:
Are you using the 2.20 release, or the latest SA from CVS?
There was an errorneous cvs commit over the weekend that damaged one of
the rules files. See bugzilla.spmassassin.org #338 for the correct file.
__
Two questions in this one. First, would it be difficult to add a rule
for blank headers? For example
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
Received: from mail.premiernet.net [205.229.224.233] by localhost with
POP3
(fetchmail-5.9.0) for ken@localhost (single-drop); Sun
On Mon, 20 May 2002 the voices made j.linn write:
> [Newbie Question]
>
> Is it possible to change the header field name for ther report from SPAM:
> to something else e.g. X-SPAM.
>
> Is it also possible to configure SA to remove some of the default headers
> as with "spam_level_stars"?
>
> If n
[Newbie Question]
Is it possible to change the header field name for ther report from SPAM:
to something else e.g. X-SPAM.
Is it also possible to configure SA to remove some of the default headers
as with "spam_level_stars"?
If not where do I patch SA to change "SPAM:" to "X-SPAM:"
John Linn
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2002, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 May 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
[...]
>> The simple filtering mode of Postfix, using a shell script and piped
>> data, can have the SMTP envelope information passed on the command
>> line. I
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 09:35:44AM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Michael Stenner wrote:
> > On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 04:15:34PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> >>I would be extremely surprised if two people report different messages
> >>that result in the same hash. Although completely possible, i
Hello,
I've been running spamassassin 2.20 on my work redhat (7.0) PC with no
problems at all. The make, make test and make install all worked first time.
I also had spam mail filtered to a separate mailbox successfully - I run the
exim MTA on the PC as well.
So, I thought I'd move this up onto
Hi !
I'm trying to install Spam Assassin for the first time, and on doing the
'make' as per the instructions I get:
> for f in spamassassin spamd/spamc.pod spamd/spamd spamproxy/spamproxyd
>lib/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm
>lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm lib/Mail/
Hi !
I'm trying to install spamassassin for the first time, and when doing
the 'make' I get:
> for f in spamassassin spamd/spamc.pod spamd/spamd spamproxy/spamproxyd
>lib/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm
>lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Persisten
Ugh, looks like SourceForge installed a lame text filter that attempts
to do virus protection (incorrectly, brokenly)... So my email didn't get
through.
I snipped the Content-Type lines from my reply this time so it will pass
the gateway.
Original Message
Subject: Mail deliv
Hi All,
Just a quick question regarding spamassassins
local.cf file. I have edited this file to whitelist all messages to one
address in my domain using the following rule:
all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have also added in a few blacklist rules using
the rule:
blacklist_from [EMAIL
Klaus Heinz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> these days I got my first spam mail containing control characters in URLs,
> I think from some spammer called Empire Towers.
>
> Although 20_uri_tests.cf contains the test HTTP_CTRL_CHARS_HOST, it wasn't
> triggered by this mail. I got curious because of this and the
Michael Stenner wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 04:15:34PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
>>I would be extremely surprised if two people report different messages
>>that result in the same hash. Although completely possible, it's also
>>very very unlikely.
>
>
> Someone said on this list tha
Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> MS> My MIME parser (posted to the dev list) croaks on invalid MIME. In
> MS> testing about 30,000 emails it only croaks on spams, so far.
> MS>
> MS> I just wish I had time to implement it inside SA (it's a big job as
> MS> currently SA's mail pars
42 matches
Mail list logo
