Ugh, looks like SourceForge installed a lame text filter that attempts
to do virus protection (incorrectly, brokenly)... So my email didn't get
through.
I snipped the Content-Type lines from my reply this time so it will pass
the gateway.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 01:32:59 -0700
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
save to /var/spool/exim/rejects/embeddedmimeattachement
generated by message filter
failed to lock mailbox
/var/spool/exim/rejects/embeddedmimeattachement (lock file):
retry timeout exceeded
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message has been rejected because it has
a potentially executable attachment
"CVS\270\305\277\366\241\242\271\334\300\355\326\306\266\310\272\315\311\350\326\303\307\351\277\366.doc.exe"
This form of attachment has been used by
trecent viruses such as that described in
http://www.fsecure.com/v-descs/love.htm
If you meant to send this file then please
package it up as a zip file and resend it.
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hippo.star.co.uk ([195.216.14.9])
by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
id 179iai-0003FI-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 20 May 2002 01:32:28
-0700
Received: from MATT_LINUX by hippo.star.co.uk
via smtpd (for usw-sf-lists.sourceforge.net
[216.136.171.198]) with SMTP; 20 May 2002 08:24:11 UT
Received: (qmail 25198 invoked from network); 20 May 2002 08:21:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO startechgroup.co.uk) (10.2.100.178)
by matt?dev.int.star.co.uk with SMTP; 20 May 2002 08:21:30 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 09:30:34 +0100
From: Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc1)
Gecko/20020426
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] botched MIME tests?
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Here are all of the emails that correctly triggered the rule. All are
> the application test. I think we should put the test into SA, but the
> far more effective test is the MIME_MISSING_BOUNDARY one.
>
Every single one of these is a virus, not spam.
Matt.
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
Hundreds of nodes, one monster rendering program.
Now that's a super model! Visit http://clustering.foundries.sf.net/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
