On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 01:42:26AM +0100, Sean Rima wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Sean Rima said:
>
>
> >>> SR> Use of uninitialized value at
> >>> SR> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line
> >>> SR> 270. DCC check skipp
-3.0 is the correct score. I just fixed it in CVS.
C
Sean Harding wrote:
SH> So is +1.9 the correct score? I could just change it manually on my install
SH> for now. Actually, I just whitelisted apple.com, so I guess it doesn't
SH> matter much...
SH>
SH> And, yeah, I'd love to go back and orde
So is +1.9 the correct score? I could just change it manually on my install
for now. Actually, I just whitelisted apple.com, so I guess it doesn't
matter much...
And, yeah, I'd love to go back and order even more from the Apple Store to
help the stock, but I think today's $4k will have to be enou
Well, now that I've checked in the DCC stuff, I'd like to stabilize that
somewhat. Once I'm happier with it, I'll do 2.21 with the amended scores, and
probably with the phrases stuff switched back on again (so we can have 2.22 just
after that!)
C
Duncan Findlay wrote:
DF> On Mon, Apr 29, 2002
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 07:31:58PM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Doh! Another score in the wrong section of the scores file. The GA shouldn't
> have been able to modify that one.
>
2.21 soon? :-)
--
Duncan Findlay
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing li
Doh! Another score in the wrong section of the scores file. The GA shouldn't
have been able to modify that one.
C
Michael Moncur wrote:
MM> > X-Spam-Report: 5.1 hits, 5 required;
MM> > * 1.9 -- Subject looks like order info
MM> > * 0.6 -- From: does not include a real name
MM> > * -
> X-Spam-Report: 5.1 hits, 5 required;
> * 1.9 -- Subject looks like order info
> * 0.6 -- From: does not include a real name
> * -0.5 -- BODY: Contains 'Dear Somebody'
> * 1.1 -- BODY: Contains a tollfree number
> * 2.0 -- Subject contains a unique ID number
Wasn't ORDER_STATUS s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Craig R. Hughes yowled:
> I switched that use to a require following someone else's advice
> (forget whose) w/out thinking about what I was doing. Probably can
> instead just move that use to the top of the module, outside the
>
Woo woo! Go Sean! I bought a bunch of apple stock not long ago. Why not go
back to the store and order more ;) Actually, I ordered something from there
about 2 weeks ago, and it got through fine; I think that was still 2.11 so I
guess the new scores are hurting my portfolio :(
C
Sean Harding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Sean Rima said:
>>> SR> Use of uninitialized value at
>>> SR> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line
>>> SR> 270. DCC check skipped: Undefined subroutine
>>> SR> &Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus::open2 cal
I switched that use to a require following someone else's advice (forget whose)
w/out thinking about what I was doing. Probably can instead just move that use
to the top of the module, outside the function where it presumably won't be
executed over and over again.
As for what the wtr thing is, I
Confirmation of my Apple Store order got blocked, just barely...
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.1 required=5.0
tests=ORDER_STATUS,NO_REAL_NAME,DEAR_SOMEBODY,CALL_FREE,SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID version=2.20
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.20 (devel $Id: SpamAssass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Sean Rima spake:
>> SR> Use of uninitialized value at
>> SR> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line
>> SR> 270. DCC check skipped: Undefined subroutine
>> SR> &Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus::open2 called
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Craig R. Hughes moaned:
> Sean Rima wrote:
>
> SR> Reference found where even-sized list expected at
> SR> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 250.
>
> Weird -- that line looks just fine to me -- it's m
Sean Rima wrote:
SR> Reference found where even-sized list expected at
SR> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 250.
Weird -- that line looks just fine to me -- it's making a has be initialized
with an empty hash. Looks like an even-sized list to me. I'll try installin
On Monday, April 29, 2002 5:46 PM, Craig R Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Steve,
>
>FYI the file is /etc/procmailrc normally (no . on the front of the filename in
>/etc)
>
Thanks- there's the kind of little detail I'd missed out on, and appreciate having it
mentioned.
Appreciated procmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Craig R. Hughes spake:
> Ooops, looks like a perl 5.6ism -- Anyone who knows enough about 5.0x
> want to fix this? Seems to me like opening to a variable is entirely
> reasonable thing to attempt... Looking at other bits of cod
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> # First stop loops
> :0
> * ^[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> {
>:0:
>/var/spool/mail/auto
>
>:0
>{
> EXITCODE=0
> HOST=
>}
> }
>
> That will match [EMAIL PROTECTED] on any of the various To,Cc,etc lines,
> then store those message
Martin,
Thanks for the help! The file numbering is just to ensure the order that the
files are read in. higher-numbered files will be read in after lower numbered
files, and will override anything in the lower files. So that way english can
be the default, but local languages can override p
Ooops, looks like a perl 5.6ism -- Anyone who knows enough about 5.0x want to
fix this? Seems to me like opening to a variable is entirely reasonable thing
to attempt... Looking at other bits of code which open things, it looks like
simply removing the $ and the my() declaration will probably
Steve,
FYI the file is /etc/procmailrc normally (no . on the front of the filename in
/etc)
In answer to your question, what you'll want to do is have something
like this at the top of your procmailrc file:
# First stop loops
:0
* ^[EMAIL PROTECTED]
{
:0:
/var/spool/mail/auto
:0
Hello.
I'm a big fan of SpamAssassin, and I'm interested in translate it to
Swedish, but I'm a bit confused about how to go about it. I notice that
there is a file 20_body_tests.cf, but 25_body_tests_pl.cf and
25_body_tests_es.cf. What is the significance of the number? Should I copy
20_body_test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Craig R. Hughes spake thusly:
> I put it in CVS last night. Thanks a lot for the work on this Tobias.
> I haven't installed DCC on my own machine yet, nor written a dcc.t,
> but will do that probably this afternoon or evening.
Hi,
I am running spamassassin on a mail relay and it seems that
my procmail recipe is breaking aliases on the downstream
mail servers. I am running Postfix-1.1.7-2 on the mail relay
and it is configured to pass all mail to procmail for
filtering (this is done as a special user "filter") where
/hom
Hi List,
I'm new at this type of thing, so bear with me. I recently installed SA and
.procmailrc files for 4 users at my small company, and it's working well- so well that
it's time to let everyone benefit from this magic tool. But before I do that, I have
2 things I have to understand:
1)
> > it "hangs" on trying to open the auto-whitelist db, and after the default
> > 30 tries it gives up with the message "Cannot open
> > ~/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist: permission denied" or similar. I've tried
> > to set permissions of files and directories without luck.
>
> One cause of thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Craig R. Hughes muttered drunkenly:
> I put it in CVS last night. Thanks a lot for the work on this Tobias.
> I haven't installed DCC on my own machine yet, nor written a dcc.t,
> but will do that probably this afternoon or even
I put it in CVS last night. Thanks a lot for the work on this Tobias. I
haven't installed DCC on my own machine yet, nor written a dcc.t, but will do
that probably this afternoon or evening. The patch looked good though, and
passes all test w/out problem when DCC is *not* installed, so I checke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Tobias von Koch yowled:
> Hi,
>
> attached is a patch which adds support for the Distributed Checksum
> Clearinghouse (DCC) System to spamassassin. As discussed earlier on
> this list, DCC is a system similar to Razor, which sup
> I would like to use RH's SendMail with SA. While I have SA up and
> working, I don't understand the steps to get it hooked into SendMail.
> Since I have never installed a Milter, the help on SA's site is over my
> head.
You don't need milter. Install the procmail RPM that comes with RedHat an
Hello,
In case anyone out there is using Stalker CommuniGate Pro mail server, I've
written a spam throttling content filter that's used to prevent outgoing and
incoming spam by throttling connections. It basically keeps historic data in a
MySQL database to keep track of how many messages a user s
Ok, sounds like a probable bug then -- I haven't looked at the allow_user_rules
stuff too closely (nor tested it much). Could you please file a bugzilla ticket
on this at http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org?
Thanks,
C
Brian Kendig wrote:
BK> Craig R Hughes wrote:
BK>
BK> > Brian,
BK> > did you r
Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Brian,
> did you restart spamd after adding the allow_user_rules line to
> local.cf?
Yup. I've rebooted the machine since then, too. I've verified
that the 'allow_user_rules 1' line is in local.cf, that my custom
rule is in '~/.spamassassin/user_prefs', that I'm rece
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 12:22:42AM +0200, Mark wrote:
> Built-in Milter support in sendmail only exists in versions 8.12 and up.
> I would like to use RH's SendMail with SA. While I have SA up and working, I don't
>understand the steps to get it hooked into SendMail. Since I have never install
OK, can we file this under the 'duh' category? I can't believe
its that simple ...
*Thank you* !!
Dave Strickler CEODWS - "The GroupWise Integration
Experts" Boston * Austin * Belgium * Denmark http://www.emailsolutions.com
(800) 999-5412 x10>>> Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
4/28/2002 6:22:4
35 matches
Mail list logo
