-3.0 is the correct score. I just fixed it in CVS. C
Sean Harding wrote: SH> So is +1.9 the correct score? I could just change it manually on my install SH> for now. Actually, I just whitelisted apple.com, so I guess it doesn't SH> matter much... SH> SH> And, yeah, I'd love to go back and order even more from the Apple Store to SH> help the stock, but I think today's $4k will have to be enough for a SH> while ;-) SH> SH> sean SH> SH> On Mon Apr 29 at 07:31:58 PM, Craig R Hughes wrote: SH> SH> > Doh! Another score in the wrong section of the scores file. The GA shouldn't SH> > have been able to modify that one. SH> > SH> > C SH> > SH> > Michael Moncur wrote: SH> > SH> > MM> > X-Spam-Report: 5.1 hits, 5 required; SH> > MM> > * 1.9 -- Subject looks like order info SH> > MM> > * 0.6 -- From: does not include a real name SH> > MM> > * -0.5 -- BODY: Contains 'Dear Somebody' SH> > MM> > * 1.1 -- BODY: Contains a tollfree number SH> > MM> > * 2.0 -- Subject contains a unique ID number SH> > MM> SH> > MM> Wasn't ORDER_STATUS supposed to be a negative-scoring rule? SH> > MM> SH> > MM> -- SH> > MM> michael moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/ SH> > MM> "We forfeit three-fourths of ourselves to be like other people." SH> > MM> -- Arthur Schopenhauer SH> > MM> SH> > MM> SH> > MM> _______________________________________________ SH> > MM> Spamassassin-talk mailing list SH> > MM> [EMAIL PROTECTED] SH> > MM> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk SH> > MM> SH> > MM> SH> > MM> SH> > SH> > SH> > _______________________________________________ SH> > Spamassassin-talk mailing list SH> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] SH> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk SH> SH> SH> SH> _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
