The trouble is though Chris that SA keeps trying to do things like open
$HOME/.spamassassin (what's $HOME set to under cygwin?), or open a
connection to syslog on localhost (does cygwin redirect syslog stuff to
the Event log or something?). I think the problem is not so much that
it won't run on
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 17:11, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> The only problems come when you get "spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-
> spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-
> spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-crash-and-burn" as
> soon as fetchmail k
Yes, I'd say relay reporting is outside the scope of SA. Even razor
reporting is a little dodgy, given that Razor has its own program to do
exactly that. But razor reporting is in there already, so I probably
won't take it out.
C
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 16:33, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Ap
At 23:33 02/04/2002, you wrote:
>I wrote a fairly decent script that automates the handling of spam
>messages (reports to razor, does the open relay check and reports to as
>many openrelay sites as you want, reports to spam cop, spits out entries
>for a sendmail accessdb, etc.):
> http://w
I didn't see the warnings about 1.20 razor in time and now I am well and
truly hosed. I installed 1.19 over 1.20 (never did figure how to uninstall
perl-hairballs) and now I get..
[esj@harvee esj]$ cat IMap/00missedspam | formail -s spamassassin -rRD
debug: using "/usr/share/spamassassin" for
[Reply-to set to mailing list]
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 10:06:39AM -0800, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
>On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 09:53, S?ren Boll Overgaard wrote:
>> Not everybody watches good morning america. I, for one, do not.
>> Sorry for the misguided attempt to be helpful.
>
>At the risk of being of
Related to an earlier message I sent the list. I'm working with a small
ISP to improve their spam handling. I've got them on track to using
spamassassin very soon. One of the issues is giving the users the
ability to report spam that is missed so that it can be reported. We've
decided to handl
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 09:59:44PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I got back from a trip this evening and the mail box was running so many
> childs of spamd that the mail box was unreachable. I cannot trace back
> to see where the box when hey wire b
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:29:01AM -0700, Michael Moncur wrote:
> Rich Wellner writes:
> > You might also consider setting up an email service for $5 a month or
> > so that runs spamassassin. I'd be willing to help if you are
> > interested but don't have time.
>
> I've actually been planning to
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 12:45 pm, Jose Morales wrote:
> Hello list... How can I use SpamAssassin with
> .qmail-default file
Put something like:
|~/develop/spamassassin/spamassassin -c ~/develop/spamassassin/rules
into .qmail-default
--
Visit http://dmoz.org, the world's | Give a man a
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:00:12PM -0500, Craig Hughes wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 04:27, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > AHA Lists wrote:
> > > I am running spamd on my redhat 6 box and spamd is taking up 5.3% memory.
> > > IS this normal?
> > >
> > > root 3401 0.0 5.3 7848 6792 ?S
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 08:52:44AM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Craig Hughes wrote:
> >Well, one issue is that rules are sometimes evals, with corresponding
> >updates to Mail::Spamassassin::EvalTests
>
> Then EvalTests should move from being a .pm module to being another .rc
> file that gets e
On 02 Apr 2002, Ken Causey muttered drunkenly:
> I'm wondering what reporting spamassassin -r actually does. I realize
> that it reports to the razor database. I'm wondering what else.
Nothing else, at present.
>whether or not it attempts to detect
> relayin
> Hello list... How can I use SpamAssassin with
> .qmail-default file and vpopmail without
> qmail-scanner.
It would be to your advantage to read the archives.
Refer to my 2 posts from 03/29/02
http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/11679/2002/3/50/8247915/
http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/116
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 03:00:51PM -0600, Ken Causey wrote:
> I'm wondering what reporting spamassassin -r actually does. I realize
> that it reports to the razor database. I'm wondering what else. In
> particular, I'm very interested in whether or not it attempts to detect
> relaying and repor
I'm wondering what reporting spamassassin -r actually does. I realize
that it reports to the razor database. I'm wondering what else. In
particular, I'm very interested in whether or not it attempts to detect
relaying and reports possible open relay servers to services such as
ordb. If not cur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I got back from a trip this evening and the mail box was running so many
childs of spamd that the mail box was unreachable. I cannot trace back
to see where the box when hey wire but as soon as I closed the master
spamd, the box came back into control
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Rob McMillin wrote:
> There is already a "funky character set" test; see
> CHARSET_FARAWAY_BODY. It doesn't work because it doesn't parse MIME
> correctly.
I see. Is there a workaround in the meantime? I'd be happy with
CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER, but that rule doesn't seem to f
Hello list... How can I use SpamAssassin with
.qmail-default file and vpopmail without
qmail-scanner.
Regards.
Jose Morales
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://http://taxes.yahoo.com/
_
Yeah, you're wrong. spamc will automagically pass the username it's
executing as to spamd. So spamc -u $LOGNAME is identical to spamc.
spamc -u somethingelse is however not the same as spamc by itself. So
the distinction is based on what userID spamc is running as. I myself
use spamc -u becau
> (Get rid of -u $LOGNAME -- it's deprecated anyways)
Depending on your settings, the -u option may be the ONLY way for
spamc/spamd to create the user_pref files.
And the setting I am thinking about is when the user's dir are NFS
mounted on the mail server, from another machine, and that they ar
At 12:56 PM 4/2/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>It's almost certainly a rule with a "bad" regex -- could you send me an
>email with attached a sample of an email that causes the high cpu usage?
Once it starts -- shortly after I put up the CVS version almost every piece
of mail seems to get stuck. I had
Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
>On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 the voices made Rob McMillin write:
>
>>There is already a "funky character set" test; see CHARSET_FARAWAY_BODY.
>>
>
> But no "funky e-mailaddresses"? I got an e-mail with a from that was something
>like Å"Å"Å"@something.tld; and I was surprised that
Please ... please ... put the downgrade to Razor 1.19 in the FAQ until the
next stable version
has all the 'razor' bugs worked out ...
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: dinsdag 2 april 2002 20:06
> To: Bradley Glonka
> Cc: SpamAssassin Users
> S
File a bugzilla ticket on it, and attach the patch, then assign the
ticket to me.
C
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 10:12, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Jim Holmes wrote:
>
> > --On Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:21 AM -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Jus
Looks like the solution is right there to me. Is there some way I could
make it more apparent? No point having the FAQ if people are seeing it,
but not finding the answer!
C
FAQ
I'm having trouble with Razor 1.20 and SpamAssassin. Help!
SpamAssassin claims that Razor is not installed when it
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 04:27, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> AHA Lists wrote:
> > I am running spamd on my redhat 6 box and spamd is taking up 5.3% memory.
> > IS this normal?
> >
> > root 3401 0.0 5.3 7848 6792 ?S08:44 0:00 perl
> > /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -a
> >
>
> This is Perl. It
No, it's not spam. It's stuff like views into SAP systems, supply chain
exception notices, things like that. Definitely stuff you don't want to
not get in your inbox immediately.
C
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 04:13, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Craig Hughes wrote:
> > Update from Silicon Valley: I've seen
It's almost certainly a rule with a "bad" regex -- could you send me an
email with attached a sample of an email that causes the high cpu usage?
Thanks,
C
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 17:33, Phydeaux wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> Today I found one of my systems almost hung because of spamd
> processes that
Sorry to jump in but I have a similar question. I have read the "man
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf" but still dont understand how I could fix a
score for exampel every mail where the sender is for example *@*.com.tw
and a score if the body contains also a com.tw address.
Any help would be appriciated.
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> David Coppit wrote:
> > Can someone tell me how the values get assigned to the various
> > "detectors" in SpamAssassin? Has anyone explored automated
> > techniques for assigning these scores based on genetic algorithms,
> > hill climbing with random res
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 the voices made Rob McMillin write:
> There is already a "funky character set" test; see CHARSET_FARAWAY_BODY.
But no "funky e-mailaddresses"? I got an e-mail with a from that was something
like Å"Å"Å"@something.tld; and I was surprised that it didn't get any hits
whatsoever.
David Coppit wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Can someone tell me how the values get assigned to the various "detectors" in
>SpamAssassin? Has anyone explored automated techniques for assigning these
>scores based on genetic algorithms, hill climbing with random restarts,
>simulated annealing, or other optimiz
David Coppit wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>I'd like to add a couple rules to SpamAssassin:
>
>- Detect if the email is in some funky character set
>- Detect if the email is not in english
>- Detect if the subject ends in six or more digits
>
>How do I go about doing this? I hope I can just dump a couple f
Take a look at "man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf" this should give you
configuration help.
--
Ed.
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I'd like to add a couple rules to SpamAssassin:
>
> - Detect if the email is in some funky character set
> - Detect if the email is not in english
> - Detect if the subject ends in six
David Coppit wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can someone tell me how the values get assigned to the various "detectors" in
> SpamAssassin? Has anyone explored automated techniques for assigning these
> scores based on genetic algorithms, hill climbing with random restarts,
> simulated annealing, or other op
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Jim Holmes wrote:
> --On Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:21 AM -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Just curious, but in 2.11, spamproxyd requires '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to
> > be set, or it won't run ... with it set, all messages triggered as SPAM go
> > to
Hi all,
Can someone tell me how the values get assigned to the various "detectors" in
SpamAssassin? Has anyone explored automated techniques for assigning these
scores based on genetic algorithms, hill climbing with random restarts,
simulated annealing, or other optimization techniques?
Regards,
Hi folks,
I'd like to add a couple rules to SpamAssassin:
- Detect if the email is in some funky character set
- Detect if the email is not in english
- Detect if the subject ends in six or more digits
How do I go about doing this? I hope I can just dump a couple files in
.spamassassin/rules or
> Sounds similar to what I'm doing for our company. I'm using
> Exim and Cyrus
> IMAP. Our main internet SMTP server checks all incoming mail
> with SA, then
> the mail is sent on to the IMAP servers where mail that was
> flagged as spam
> is delivered to an IMAP folder called "_spam_". The use
--On Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:21 AM -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just curious, but in 2.11, spamproxyd requires '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to
> be set, or it won't run ... with it set, all messages triggered as SPAM go
> to a central address, which, IMHO, is "A Bad Thing" ..
Sounds similar to what I'm doing for our company. I'm using Exim and Cyrus
IMAP. Our main internet SMTP server checks all incoming mail with SA, then
the mail is sent on to the IMAP servers where mail that was flagged as spam
is delivered to an IMAP folder called "_spam_". The users just use Outlo
Just curious, but in 2.11, spamproxyd requires '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to
be set, or it won't run ... with it set, all messages triggered as SPAM go
to a central address, which, IMHO, is "A Bad Thing" ...
Has anyone looked at changing:
my $status = $spamtest->check($mail);
if ($status->is_s
>I've actually been planning to set up a service like this on my server. I've
>run into lots of people who think that SA is a good idea, but installing it
>themselves or convincing an ISP to do so is beyond them.
>
>Unlike other spam-filtering services, this one would admit up front that it
>runs
>Can someone please explain the razor 1.20 issue? spamassassin is
>convinced that its not installed even though it is.
Downgrade to Razor 1.19
As far as I understood, Razor had once a problem, so SA installed a
work around, but since Razor 1.20, the problem is solved, but SA still
has the wo
Rich Wellner writes:
> You might also consider setting up an email service for $5 a month or
> so that runs spamassassin. I'd be willing to help if you are
> interested but don't have time.
I've actually been planning to set up a service like this on my server. I've
run into lots of people who t
At 13:39 02/04/2002, you wrote:
>Can someone please explain the razor 1.20 issue? spamassassin is
>convinced that its not installed even though it is.
>
>The FAQ mentions this is a problem but not how to fix it.
OK maybe I shouldn't post to this because I'm not a 100% certain -
but I'll try an
Hi, all!
Today I found one of my systems almost hung because of spamd
processes that were using lots of CPU but apparently not doing
anything. This is on a Solaris box with Sendmail. Spamd is called via a
system-wide procmail script. After this happened twice I restarted
spamd and sendmail and t
Can someone please explain the razor 1.20 issue? spamassassin is
convinced that its not installed even though it is.
The FAQ mentions this is a problem but not how to fix it.
Thanks
brad
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
Gregor Lawatscheck wrote:
> At 11:59 02/04/2002, you wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.messagelabs.com/ :-)
>>
>
>
> Well, if they were $5 a month (maybe they are but they don't say so
> anywhere) they'd be interesting to recommend to people who're looking for a
> good email solution. It seems to me t
At 11:59 02/04/2002, you wrote:
>http://www.messagelabs.com/ :-)
>
Well, if they were $5 a month (maybe they are but they don't say so
anywhere) they'd be interesting to recommend to people who're looking for a
good email solution. It seems to me that they're targeted at medium to
large busin
Rich Wellner wrote:
> Sidney Markowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>Perhaps you can suggest that Windows end users speak to their ISP
>>about installing Spamassassin as a service to their customers.
>
>
> You might also consider setting up an email service for $5 a month or
> so that runs
Rich Wellner writes:
> You might also consider setting up an email service for $5 a month or
> so that runs spamassassin. I'd be willing to help if you are
> interested but don't have time.
I've actually been planning to set up a service like this on my server. I've
run into lots of people who t
AHA Lists wrote:
> I am running spamd on my redhat 6 box and spamd is taking up 5.3% memory.
> IS this normal?
>
> root 3401 0.0 5.3 7848 6792 ?S08:44 0:00 perl
> /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -a
>
This is Perl. It trades memory for speed. Yes, that's perfectly normal.
One thing t
Craig Hughes wrote:
> Update from Silicon Valley: I've seen a couple products in the last few
> days that send out emails as part of an enterprise software system where
> they contain an IFRAME to embed a dynamically updating web page inside
> an email. The idea is you send out an email which the
At 20:31 01/04/2002, you wrote:
>However, from time to time, I still get SA flagging mails that originated
>from a dialup IP and were relayed through the ISP (the way it should have
>been)
>
>Will SA penalize a mail if any IP in the received headers is in a DUL or
>only if the first line (seen
On Monday 01 April 2002 09:33 am, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Oh my god. SpamAssassin on GMA. We're doomed.
You know, that would have been a good April Fools joke, if it weren't for
that fact that it actually happenend...
--
Visit http://dmoz.org, the world's | Give a man a match, and he'll be w
57 matches
Mail list logo
